Logiko, as I think you are someone who genuinely believes what you say, I'll show you at least a modicum of respect and respond to each point in turn. However, I do not expect you to genuinely listen to the opinions of other people:
To begin, It is suggested, and I'll try and find the study for this later, that your levels of Oxytocin that is responsible for love, is dampened by overly-stimulation. This means having a portfolio of sexual encounters can damage your ability to form intimate connections with people.
On a moral level, I think pornography and OnlyFans objectifies both men and women. Those involved in producing it and those who consume it. Porn is predatory.
Sex can be liberating, but under proper conditions. Such as when in a loving pair of two people. And yes, this can be same-sex or opposite sex.
This is dehumanising towards conservative women. It is also the whole "no-true Scotsman" narrative.
Freely allowing access to your body is bad for human relationships. What I mean is -- giving sex too soon creates hookup culture, which is damaging for the family unit and sexual health of all involved.
You're denouncing all that will disagree with you as morally wrong. This is the incorrect way to argue, especially for someone called Logiko.
No true scotsman and ideological puritanism.
Men respecting women and vice-versa is healthy. It is not patriarchy to accept that the sexes are different. EQUAL but different.
This is simply playing victim politics. You're demonizing men. You're treating them like predators.
They are not. Enough of the self hatred.
This is the danger of self-identification and diagnosis. I know many who have thought they were happy and then years later regretted their decisions. If people are happy, so be it, but to ignore there are clearly women and men slipping through the cracks is... ludicrous.
More pointless labels. Honestly, Logiko, I go through lengths to not label you despite your insistence of giving people ample chances to do so. I am neither of the above, but I might be in your school of thought which is rooted in denial of reality in favour of how it "should" be.
To begin, It is suggested, and I'll try and find the study for this later, that your levels of Oxytocin that is responsible for love, is dampened by overly-stimulation. This means having a portfolio of sexual encounters can damage your ability to form intimate connections with people.
On a moral level, I think pornography and OnlyFans objectifies both men and women. Those involved in producing it and those who consume it. Porn is predatory.
Sex can be liberating, but under proper conditions. Such as when in a loving pair of two people. And yes, this can be same-sex or opposite sex.
This is dehumanising towards conservative women. It is also the whole "no-true Scotsman" narrative.
Freely allowing access to your body is bad for human relationships. What I mean is -- giving sex too soon creates hookup culture, which is damaging for the family unit and sexual health of all involved.
You are right, conservative, far right, terf and prolife women exist. 
No true scotsman and ideological puritanism.
Men respecting women and vice-versa is healthy. It is not patriarchy to accept that the sexes are different. EQUAL but different.
This is simply playing victim politics. You're demonizing men. You're treating them like predators.
They are not. Enough of the self hatred.
This is the danger of self-identification and diagnosis. I know many who have thought they were happy and then years later regretted their decisions. If people are happy, so be it, but to ignore there are clearly women and men slipping through the cracks is... ludicrous.
And you are a mysoginist and a transphobe
I Guess we are not what we think we are at the end
I Guess we are not what we think we are at the end
