dude you call everyone far right, like literally anyone and everyone is far right to you
FIrst of a few lie from you and complete missunderstanding volontary or not of what I say. You literally invent stuff.

Here: Where do you see that I say that everything that is at my right is far right ? Nowhere ? Exactly, you are inventing stuff because you can't reply properly to what I said. Coping mechanism it seems.

The majority of this forum must be at my right, still, do you see me calling the mod far right ? Do you see me calling Bear, Toby or other poster here far right ?

No. Simply because they are not. Being "far right" means assertain a set of values that are far right (ultra conservatism/xenophobia/racism/transphobia/antiwokeness/sexism etc.) So only a few people here are far right. HELL... I don't even think you are far right even if I think that you are just an sad incel.

Look closer and stop inventing stuff.


literally means jack shit, You see cnn as far right and alex jones as also far right
Again, a pure lie and an invention from you.

Where the HECK do you see me quoting CNN as a far right media ? Especially when I already told multiple time here that they were liberals ....

The F is wrong with you ?



you see opposing parties as the exact same position just cause they arent far left
Again, an invention. Despite what you are trying to say, I already told you that liberals are not the conservative right and the conservative right is not the far right.

If you are threaten by me calling you a far right, you might want to start reading correctly what I say and AGAIN, stop inventing stuff.

anyone that literally is not a communist to you equates to far right
Same thing, invention again. At this point I think you are just trolling. Noone can be that oblivious and read so badly others points.


so not being a communist = right wing
Stop making fallacious assertion. That's not what I said and you know it. your intellectual lazyness is incredible today. But I'm not surprised, you must have trained yourself during your ban.

If I say that I'm not a communist, it means that I'm an entry leftist. Which means that on my right there can be left wing liberals (the left wing of the right side if you will, Biden for ex.), Extrem centrist, conservative rightist, far rightist and cryptofascist. Not everyone on my right isfar right.

Again, stop inventing stuff you don't understand.

why do you hate liberals, they have same stance as you on literally fucking everything


-femmisism
-transgenderism
-race issues
-climate change etc
That's where you THINK you understand politic but you actually don't understand it at all. No, liberals don't have the same stance as leftist on those issue. They do takle those subject because they don't have a choice but not in the same way leftist do.

To explain those things to you in short term, let's say that while leftist have a materialist vision of those issue, the liberals (and therefore the entry right) have an invididualistic vision of those issue.

In others short term, where the left see those issue as syonymous of problems related to systemic issues, the liberals thinks that those problems are the results of bad invididual behavior.

THis has for effect a complete missunderstanding of the liberal for the things that should be done to deal with those problem.

Let's take the example of climate change. For the left, climate change is a systemic problem that should be handled by meking pressure on big business. Liberal don't understand that reality. Because they think in an individualistic manner, they think we can stop climate change by all making our share of goods for the environment when in reality it doesn't have the same impact.

Another example is feminism. For the left, the patriarchy can only be dealt with by understanding that this is a system of domination of women by men and that ALL the men without exception are gaining things from it and are participating because of our education and environment to this problem most of the time volontaraly. THe liberals don't understand that. Because of their individualistic vision, they think they are not responsible and that patriarchy is something exterior to men and that it is something that is unconscious, something "etherial" and therefore something that can be "erased" by becoming someone "softer", or "more feminist". We call them the "profem", this is a capitalistic vision of feminism that negate the foundamental problem of patriarchy which is the system of domination imposed on women by men.

A good video on that, with a sociological vision (in french with subtitle:)


Again, liberals are not leftists. They are CAPITALISTS who are appropriating leftist value to make capitalism flow faster.


I brought up the names of specific people and corporations who agree with your politics
That's your problem. You don't see that those corporation do NOT agree with our politic. And that simply because you don't care to dig deeper beyond what you see on TV or on streaming plateforms. Do you think because Disney or NEtflix chooses to suddenly include more people of color or story with gay people that those corporation are suddenly leftist ? Damn... you are blind mate.

If you cared to listen to actual leftist militantism you would know that a lot of people on the left are denouncing the media because diverse reason (ultra liberalism/Pinkwashing/Queerbaiting/unethical AI use /Bad journalism/bad emplyement systems etc... the list goes on.

Those corporation, just like the majority of corporation nowaday are ULTRA LIBERALS, meaning that they don't really care about leftist value, they are here to make PROFIT.

Again, dig deeper before commenting ignorant stuff.


and man you can say leftist means definitionally this or that, i dont care like you call yourself rebel and are more siding with biden then your average joe on social and poltical issues
if the av erage joe is a trump supporter, i'm indeed closer to biden yes.



just cause you self id as a rebel does not make you one
We are not rebels, we are leftist. You see me as a rebel because your vision is hegemonic. Meaning that it proves exactly the opposite of your point, you are fighting FOR the status co, not against.


self id means nothing unless it's consistent with what's the reality and the reality being if you really wanted to rebel, you would be right wing not left
What Are you babbling ? I just proved you that the right is conservative. Stop calling the right "the rebels", they are fighting just like you, to keep the status co, the oppressions against women and minorities, the capitalism, alive.


and you can agree with the status quo and still wish for things to change like carrot those are not mutual exclusive positions
Actually no you can't. If you are agreeing with the status co, it means you don't want things to change. That's the f*ck*ng definition mate!


like there are things, your potitical side despite being the status quo would love to change eg no free speech laws so they lock up all those pesky right wingers who arent doing as the democrats and left wing media tell them
I think you are again mistaking "leftist media" with "liberal media".


and why are nazis national socialists if they are far right?
Someone who know a tiny bit of history knows that the "national socialism" party is a far right party that is opposed to socialism as it was at the time.

So why are they far right ? Because they have far right ideas Einstein. Its literally the Nazi party. Its OPPOSED to international socialism.


why are femminists called femminists if they are for equality
Because right now, women are under oppression. So we need to be feminist to create the equality... You CAN'T create equality if you believe that both GENDER have the same right and are under the same scale of oppression. Men are not under oppression, WOMEN ARE. You don't really think before posting, do you ?
 
For the left, the patriarchy can only be dealt with by understanding that this is a system of domination of women by men and that ALL the men without exception are gaining things from it

there's no women opressed shit in reality


women are doing better in higher education, are having more kids then the men are and are even making more money



the invention of a women opressed narrative is total bullshit made up by the left ie your group


only way in which women have it bad really would be low class problems faced by most average people


it's much like systematic racism, it's madeup bs by leftist liberals



there are literal polcies made to help solely and solely alone black people and literal world leaders admit to trying to get a black vote

In others short term, where the left see those issue as syonymous of problems related to systemic issues, the liberals thinks that those problems are the results of bad invididual behavior.

biden is not a leftist cause he agrees on everything as you but he assumes it's cause of personal choice and not systematic factors so entirely different cause of that despite holding the same stances


im a rebel man, biden is right on everything except for the fact, it's systematic that's where the disagreement




like im not like biden, he's right on every single issue but just misunderstands the underlying reason


if you think a dude is right but just a misunderstood reason that does not make him a different side




what you are doing here is distancing yourself from the status quo which you agree by aseerting motive which idagaf



steve and bill can both support white supremacy however bill does it for profits where steve does it for the publicity



is this hyptothical duo now entirely different stances cause lol motive?
 
Because right now, women are under oppression. So we need to be feminist to create the equality... You CAN'T create equality if you believe that both GENDER have the same right and are under the same scale of oppression. Men are not under oppression, WOMEN ARE. You don't really think before posting, do you ?


the people running the world


the media
the goverments


are femmist idealogues like yourself.




they are not opressing women, they aim to support them


there is no opression, the media and you liberal friends are just wrong



in the child cuystody cases, men are less favored then women wanna know why because your idealogical beliefs are just flat on their face wrong


if it was really a male run system made for the benefit of men, then the men would be prefered in such cases


and the reason they are not would be cause women have more societal power.


if the av erage joe is a trump supporter, i'm indeed closer to biden yes.

probably more biden voters then trump voters for 2 reasons


pretty sure, the public vote was won by joe


and for 2
media indoctrination works


if the big wigs at cnn and bbc hate trump then spread it towards the average joe, they gonna likely buy into what their told cause most people are stupid


That's your problem. You don't see that those corporation do NOT agree with our politic

you said they agreed with you


just that they had different motive, with it being personal not systematic


id love to see a single actual liberal say that and no a right wing libertarian is not a progressive liberal so dave rubin does not count
Post automatically merged:



carrot are you not femminist


you dont agree with the status quo right



so do tell why the leader of a entire country proclaims himself as a femminist?


sounds alot like the status quo and carrot's position are the exact same
 
Last edited:
there's no women opressed shit in reality


women are doing better in higher education, are having more kids then the men are and are even making more money



the invention of a women opressed narrative is total bullshit made up by the left ie your group


only way in which women have it bad really would be low class problems faced by most average people


it's much like systematic racism, it's madeup bs by leftist liberals



there are literal polcies made to help solely and solely alone black people and literal world leaders admit to trying to get a black vote
Ignorant stuff, read some studies. You know.. science.

if you think a dude is right but just a misunderstood reason that does not make him a different side
Yes it does when the solution to resolve a problem create more harm than good. Liberals don't understand core societal and political issue, that's why they have very poor solutions to deal with those problems.. and i'm not talking about what other conservative rightists do.. that's even worse.



what you are doing here is distancing yourself from the status quo which you agree by aseerting motive which idagaf



steve and bill can both support white supremacy however bill does it for profits where steve does it for the publicity



is this hyptothical duo now entirely different stances cause lol motive?
I think you don't understand what we are talking about. That's the problem.



are femmist idealogues like yourself.
No, only in your nightmares mate.


there is no opression, the media and you liberal friends are just wrong
I Guess science is wrong too.


if it was really a male run system made for the benefit of men, then the men would be prefered in such cases
You only have one example to counter my assertions, I have a hundreds.. I don't think you will make it Billy..


media indoctrination works
Indeed, you are a perfect example of that. You are completely intoxicated by social networks and incel propaganda.

so do tell why the leader of a entire country proclaims himself as a femminist?
Dude.. there are people on the right who calls themself "feminist".. you don't become a feminist just because you say you are one. Are you for real or what ?
 
Ignorant stuff, read some studies. You know.. science.

facts that can clearly be cited
such as alimony,lower sentencing and prefered child custody


hold more value

libreral sociology


and tbh femminist theory on a opressed and opressor is just a theory and nothing more

it will never be science, you claim so but science is the study of the natural not a proganda mill for the liberal elites and their loyal liberal supporters such as yourself




I Guess science is wrong too.

i think sociology studies that agree with you and other liberals are 100 percent wrong



however real evidence based science, such as biology or astrology are not wrong cause it's based on data and facts

unlike femminism which is no different to christanity just a baseless belief system only supported by biased zealots who decry reality in favor of lunacy

the idea that men opress women is nuts, if men had it so made in the shade then they wouldt be a majourity of the homeless or majourity of suicides


the stance, i hold is that women only struggle on the basis of class. ie it's based on gender


there are more benefits to being a women socially, if a man wants money

fuck off do it yourself and man up


if a women needs money then she just needs a good provider who will give her what she needs no questions asked


if there was a magic power to decide which gender, id be born as id chose women everytime cause contrary to your belief system

life fucking sucks as a man, it's not like im waking up carrot and everything just goes perfect for me cause lol privilge


you dont live in the real world, you are too focused on your belief system to see all the issues average dudes face but ig to you, poverty for men just aint real cause we are priviliged pigs who have no real issues


Dude.. there are people on the right who calls themself "feminist".. you don't become a feminist just because you say you are one. Are you for real or what ?

treadeau is right wing?

wtf are you even talking about

Indeed, you are a perfect example of that. You are completely intoxicated by social networks and incel propaganda.

last videos, i watched were ones about omni man


treadeau saying he's a femminist


and right wing is the new counter culture


none of which are really incel but ok




and yea random fucking dudes online have so much power, that's why google sometimes bans them


cause they are the status quo, those darn incels have so much power that the site they are bans and sliences them


the same company that has the same liberal poltics as you
 
facts that can clearly be cited
such as alimony,lower sentencing and prefered child custody


hold more value

libreral sociology
it will never be science, you claim so but science is the study of the natural not a proganda mill for the liberal elites and their loyal liberal supporters such as yourself
Just another way to say that you deny the scientificity of sociology which just make you antiscientific.

If you can't accept science there is no way I will debate with you. rest in ignorance mate.

You don't even understand what a liberal is..


Not the sharpest knive in the drawer I see...

Dude, you don't even understand what science is. Don't try to lecture me on what it is not.


nlike femminism which is no different to christanity just a baseless belief system only supported by biased zealots who decry reality in favor of lunacy

the idea that men opress women is nuts, if men had it so made in the shade then they wouldt be a majourity of the homeless or majourity of suicides


the stance, i hold is that women only struggle on the basis of class. ie it's based on gender


there are more benefits to being a women socially, if a man wants money

fuck off do it yourself and man up


if a women needs money then she just needs a good provider who will give her what she needs no questions asked


if there was a magic power to decide which gender, id be born as id chose women everytime cause contrary to your belief system

life fucking sucks as a man, it's not like im waking up carrot and everything just goes perfect for me cause lol privilge


you dont live in the real world, you are too focused on your belief system to see all the issues average dudes face but ig to you, poverty for men just aint real cause we are priviliged pigs who have no real issues
Same thing, rest in ignrance I won't debate with science deniers.


treadeau is right wing?
Yes, welcome in the real world.


and right wing is the new counter culture
The rightist are nothing but reactionnary people. Its not about counter culture, its about opposite change and evolution of society. Its about opposing the evolution of the status co.

You are starting to sound like them.. maybe you are.. in fact.

I've debunked your point many time and you keep repeating the same sh*t in circle like a parrot what didn't understand who I said. Its no point debating with incel and science denier like you. You are like trolls.

Now I need to sleep, bye
 

Zolo

Cope Doctor
Just another way to say that you deny the scientificity of sociology which just make you antiscientific.

If you can't accept science there is no way I will debate with you. rest in ignorance mate.

You don't even understand what a liberal is..



Not the sharpest knive in the drawer I see...

Dude, you don't even understand what science is. Don't try to lecture me on what it is not.



Same thing, rest in ignrance I won't debate with science deniers.



Yes, welcome in the real world.



The rightist are nothing but reactionnary people. Its not about counter culture, its about opposite change and evolution of society. Its about opposing the evolution of the status co.

You are starting to sound like them.. maybe you are.. in fact.

I've debunked your point many time and you keep repeating the same sh*t in circle like a parrot what didn't understand who I said. Its no point debating with incel and science denier like you. You are like trolls.

Now I need to sleep, bye
What do you work ?
 
Not the sharpest knive in the drawer I see...
astronomy


i meant



like study of the stars


Yes, welcome in the real world.


crazy world more like


treadeau's party is called centre left even by wikipedia's biased standards
Not the sharpest knive in the drawer I see...
astronomy


i meant



like study of the stars


Yes, welcome in the real world.


crazy world more like


treadeau's party is called centre left even by wikipedia's biased standards
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Canada


in reality, he's a leftist exactly just like you


cause as much as you deny sociology will never be science and leftism currently is status quo
 
Did you even watch the video?
Some people from amongst the Sufi mystics and others like some of the Ottoman Jannisaries (not allowed to marry from what I remember) were known for drifting that way or composing literature containing that. Some of the said Sufi mystics went too far theologically and were considered to be far outside of traditional religious norms anyway.

All this to say what tho TAC?
 
Definitely not just my opinion lol but by the body of traditional Muslim scholarship of the last 1400 years.
There was never a monolithic body of traditional scholarship. Are you willfully forgetting about sectarianism?
We can get into it but you might have to ban yourself if you get reported TAC
Is this a threat to report me? For what exactly? I did not insult anyone
 
Top