poor policy can include the treatment of migrants and tbh it's dumb to assume migrants have to mean different skin color
plenty of ukrainain migrants are white
Nobody is assuming the color of skin of migrant here
plenty of ukrainain migrants are white
Funny, those migrant get priviledge that african migrant don't get. Don't get me wrong, they are treated well, but african migrant should also be treated well as well because they leave most of the time for the same reason : the impossibility of living in their home country.
and yes there is reason to dislike immigrants outside of racism such as taking jobs from the native popluation or not fitting in with the native poplus
No there are not. Migrant don't "take the jobs of native population" (btw native population is the US are what we called them a few years ago "the amerindians") Migrant mostly take job that are unpopular and non occupied by citizens. Mostly hard working and poorly paid jobs. So this far right rethoric is simply wrong.
most of the media companies are literally on the left side
Again, no. THere are on the sides of LIBERALS.
I'll keep hammering in your face that concept until you understand or give up:
Progressism =/= leftism and leftism =/= liberalism
Medias are on the side of the liberals meaning the entry right. This is why mainstream media never fight the far_right ideas on a core basis (meaning around the values and not just against trump) and why you never see mainstream media take the side of the Palestine in the current conflict when there are literally colonized people and why you see often Israel representative.
ill give you credit on this maybe it's a nazi utopia in france or whatever but nobody here even cares about france or speaks the languate
Your comment about France just show how ignorant you are about International relations, and I'm not even fond of nationalism so this should be quite the clue for you. But anyway, I proved to you that the case of France can be imported in multiple country including USA through the lens of multiple personnality like Trump / Depp / Brad Pitt / and more:
https://www.tmj4.com/news/30-celebrities-accused-of-sexual-assault-since-harvey-weinstein#
why even post it publically if it's not gonna inform the lamen of their reasons for x or y conclusion
it's literally poltitical propganda
it's not meant to inform the reader of anything
There ARE citations, at the ends of articles. You just didn't look.
it's literally poltitical propganda
Its not, its peer reviewed research and you refuse to see it as such
such as the budlight situalation
THe woke descision of budlight was to sponsor a trans woman. Here. DO you see this as a problem ? Well the far right did, hence why there was a calling for a anti-woke boycott, Dylan Mulvaney (the woman influencer) was literally targeted by those bigots. In response, instead of sticking with the girl, Budlight stepped away and listened to the bigots
https://people.com/bud-light-controversy-everything-to-know-7547159.
So the reason they lost money is not because they went "woke", its precisely the opposite, they alienated people who wanted more inclusivity
or the case with captain marvel recently
There was no problem with captain marvel unless the fact that it was just a meh movie. What you might be refering to is the anti-woke backlash that the movie revieved because of the comments of the actress explaining in an interview that she wanted her press day to be more inclusive and include more people and women of color in a world dominated by white men.
She was ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, but this didn't make the far right and the incel community laugh, so they created an internet backlash and a boycott call.
A boycott that absolutely didn't worked. Just to give you a little hint, for a budget of 152 Millions of dollars, Captain marvel grossed
over $1.1 billion worldwide .
So as you can see, there was absolutely NO EFFECT, the production didn't went broke because of incels and the far right. Simply because the target audience is not you or the far right.
it's clear, it aint profit driven but rather idealogical
I just proved you it is mate...