Lets look at the facts :

For the first point, no one here was able to counter my argumentation on leftist beliefs and patriarchy, worse since I've provided research paper and data reports, the only thing you have been doing is attack my person, simply because you can't attack my arguments which are, again, based on science.

As for the second point, I've never insulted you guys, absolutely never. If you think I have, this is a cognitive bias due to your own behavior which is reflecting on your vision of me. But if you don't believe me, you can check back all my posts. Go ahead, have fun :)

Finally for the third point, what you guys have been doing in those last few pages is attack me on my personnal situation. This is something I've never done (and will never do).

Conclusion, i'm not the toxic one, you guys are.
C4N:"Calls everyone xyxphobic/fascist".
C4N:"You guys are toxic"
:ohreally:
 
C4N:"Calls everyone xyxphobic/fascist".
C4N:"You guys are toxic"
First, do you have quote of me calling someone among you a fascist here ?

Second, describing your political visions or your behavior is not being toxic, its a description of your visions. You don't see me being triggered because you call me woke do you ?
 
There is no such thing as a poor policy on migrants. Migrants is a bigot problems, migrants don't creates economic or social problems on a systemic scale therefore there is absolutely NO reason to talk about migrant unless we are bigot and we don't like people of other color/culture.


poor policy can include the treatment of migrants and tbh it's dumb to assume migrants have to mean different skin color


plenty of ukrainain migrants are white


and yes there is reason to dislike immigrants outside of racism such as taking jobs from the native popluation or not fitting in with the native poplus


Today, the overton windows has gone so far right that they see simple leftist like me like anarchist (


most of the media companies are literally on the left side



ill give you credit on this maybe it's a nazi utopia in france or whatever but nobody here even cares about france or speaks the languate



and tbh it's really dubious to even take a notion like that seriously but im not to care enough about french culture to even make a whole ass discussion over your people's poltics



Especially when there is a consensus between researcher.

why even post it publically if it's not gonna inform the lamen of their reasons for x or y conclusion


it's literally poltitical propganda


it's not meant to inform the reader of anything just tell them about the leftist poltics with underlying reasons just being the cosenus


Again, this boils done to profit. If its true that they are leaning more and more to the left, their only goal is profit mate.


so even when they lose money on these woke decsions


such as the budlight situalation



or the case with captain marvel recently




it's clear, it aint profit driven but rather idealogical



why do shit that keeps losing money if it's based on profit

most of the media companies are literally on the left side



ill give you credit on this maybe it's a nazi utopia in france or whatever but nobody here even cares about france or speaks the languate



and tbh it's really dubious to even take a notion like that seriously but im not to care enough about french culture to even make a whole ass discussion over your people's poltics



Especially when there is a consensus between researcher.

why even post it publically if it's not gonna inform the lamen of their reasons for x or y conclusion


it's literally poltitical propganda


it's not meant to inform the reader of anything just tell them about the leftist poltics with underlying reasons just being the cosenus


Again, this boils done to profit. If its true that they are leaning more and more to the left, their only goal is profit mate.


so even when they lose money on these woke decsions


such as the budlight situalation



or the case with captain marvel recently




it's clear, it aint profit driven but rather idealogical



why do shit that keeps losing money if it's based on profit
 
poor policy can include the treatment of migrants and tbh it's dumb to assume migrants have to mean different skin color


plenty of ukrainain migrants are white
Nobody is assuming the color of skin of migrant here

plenty of ukrainain migrants are white
Funny, those migrant get priviledge that african migrant don't get. Don't get me wrong, they are treated well, but african migrant should also be treated well as well because they leave most of the time for the same reason : the impossibility of living in their home country.


and yes there is reason to dislike immigrants outside of racism such as taking jobs from the native popluation or not fitting in with the native poplus
No there are not. Migrant don't "take the jobs of native population" (btw native population is the US are what we called them a few years ago "the amerindians") Migrant mostly take job that are unpopular and non occupied by citizens. Mostly hard working and poorly paid jobs. So this far right rethoric is simply wrong.

most of the media companies are literally on the left side
Again, no. THere are on the sides of LIBERALS.

I'll keep hammering in your face that concept until you understand or give up: Progressism =/= leftism and leftism =/= liberalism

Medias are on the side of the liberals meaning the entry right. This is why mainstream media never fight the far_right ideas on a core basis (meaning around the values and not just against trump) and why you never see mainstream media take the side of the Palestine in the current conflict when there are literally colonized people and why you see often Israel representative.

ill give you credit on this maybe it's a nazi utopia in france or whatever but nobody here even cares about france or speaks the languate
Your comment about France just show how ignorant you are about International relations, and I'm not even fond of nationalism so this should be quite the clue for you. But anyway, I proved to you that the case of France can be imported in multiple country including USA through the lens of multiple personnality like Trump / Depp / Brad Pitt / and more:
https://www.tmj4.com/news/30-celebrities-accused-of-sexual-assault-since-harvey-weinstein#

why even post it publically if it's not gonna inform the lamen of their reasons for x or y conclusion


it's literally poltitical propganda


it's not meant to inform the reader of anything
There ARE citations, at the ends of articles. You just didn't look.

it's literally poltitical propganda
Its not, its peer reviewed research and you refuse to see it as such
such as the budlight situalation
THe woke descision of budlight was to sponsor a trans woman. Here. DO you see this as a problem ? Well the far right did, hence why there was a calling for a anti-woke boycott, Dylan Mulvaney (the woman influencer) was literally targeted by those bigots. In response, instead of sticking with the girl, Budlight stepped away and listened to the bigots
https://people.com/bud-light-controversy-everything-to-know-7547159.

So the reason they lost money is not because they went "woke", its precisely the opposite, they alienated people who wanted more inclusivity


or the case with captain marvel recently
There was no problem with captain marvel unless the fact that it was just a meh movie. What you might be refering to is the anti-woke backlash that the movie revieved because of the comments of the actress explaining in an interview that she wanted her press day to be more inclusive and include more people and women of color in a world dominated by white men.

She was ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, but this didn't make the far right and the incel community laugh, so they created an internet backlash and a boycott call.

A boycott that absolutely didn't worked. Just to give you a little hint, for a budget of 152 Millions of dollars, Captain marvel grossed over $1.1 billion worldwide .

So as you can see, there was absolutely NO EFFECT, the production didn't went broke because of incels and the far right. Simply because the target audience is not you or the far right.

it's clear, it aint profit driven but rather idealogical
I just proved you it is mate...
 
C4N and I disagree on when life begins
At fertilization
Post automatically merged:

Um yes it is?
Post automatically merged:

Yes I did, she is responsible of violence too but in those case, she is not responsible for a rape. She may have been doing shady stuff too but this DOESN'T NEGATES what she suffered in the first place. Both were trying to hurt the other out of the situation, but one did worse, and this is not the one that one laughed at, this was the one seen as the hero
How do we know her accusations are legit?

Because people dont believe her because of how she acted in the trial. A complete psychopath and compulsive liar.
Post automatically merged:

Tell me, did Johnny depp suffered internet harrasment ? And global shame ? Can you adequate being harrassed and delegitimize in your testimonies as the same as having a dedicated fanbase rooting for you while you are being isolated from the industry ? (for the right reason btw)
With her initial accusations, yes he did
He also lost two huge franchises in potc and harry potter shit because of that

The trial is what helped him again, because everyone could see what a massive manupilative psychopath amber is.
Post automatically merged:

we MUST believe all women to even the plainfield
Nah, we go by evidence and not kust believe all women by default.

Thats beyond retarded
Post automatically merged:

those migrant get priviledge that african migrant don't get
Like what? And where?
Post automatically merged:

Dylan Mulvaney (the woman influencer)
*trans woman
Post automatically merged:

So the reason they lost money is not because they went "woke", its precisely the opposite, they alienated people who wanted more inclusivity
They lost money because of the boycott. What was the boycott about? You mentioned it yourself
 
Last edited:
Top