Controversial General Political Discussion

[Zenos7]

"gender theory" doesn't exist. "Gender STUDIES" exist.

Gender studies are a field of research of sociology. A SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE




There ARE genetic difference between Male and Female sex, but this is SEX. Not GENDER.

Gender is a SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION.

ITS

NOT

SEX!


Avec vous, j'ai l'impression de parler avec adorateur de la théorie de la terre plate. Ce même déni de la science...

Oui, toi qui vient d'essayer de traduire ce commentaire et surtout toi qui vient m'expliquer qu'il n'y a que les hommes et les femmes:
Au lieu de passer ton temps sur google à essayer de trouver des articles scientifiques sur des sites d'extrème droite ou conservateurs expliquant que celui qui te rabache que le genre est une construction, n'est en fait qu'un woke qui ne comprend rien à la biologie.. Toi, oui toi ! Va voir ton centre scientifique le plus proche (et pas simplement l'oncle qui a fait un jour une thèse sur les grenouilles du Sahara) là ou il y a plein de scientifique et de chercheurs, allez.. une grande université disons... Et va leur demander comment lire et chercher des articles scientifiques sur google. Ensuite, tu vas me faire le plaisir d'aller toi même sur google et d'aller rechercher des articles scientifiques section sociologie. Tu devrais trouver des milliers d'articles.. Ensuite, parce que tu es quelqu'un de très futé, tu vas aller noter les petits noms de tous les chercheurs en sociologies les plus cité. Une fois que ce sera fait.. et bien tu auras une liste, tu prends celui qui est le plus accessible, tu trouves son adresse mail et tu lui envoies un petit mail. Le titre va etre simple, "question à propos de votre discipline". Dans ce mail, tu vas leur demander gentillement si son travail est scientifique. Tu n'oublieras pas les politesse et tu cliqueras sur "envoyer". Voilà. Normalement si tu n'es pas idiot et que tu as vraiment envie d'apprendre, tu devrais avoir fait tout ça sans trop de problème. Alors maintenant soit sage et lorsque tu pourras, indique nous ici la reponse de ce scientifique.





That's a loads of complotist BS, but tell me.... EVEN IF that were true.. Can you tell me how reducing the global population would be a bad thing ?




The big overlord, the flag of a thousand colors. The worst ennemy of the Dalek:

"Compassionnate, Compassionate COMPASIONNATEEEEE"

In a few hundreds years, you guys will be seen in the same light as the Gallics who were afraid that the sky would fall on their heads... I would laugh at you with our hypothetical descendants if your rethoric wasn't so dangerous..

And the worst thing, is that its US, those who fight the status co on the question of heteronormativity, Patriarchy, ethnic inequalities and racism, capitalism, liberalism, poverty... that YOU are calling "boot Lickers".

You are literally sucking the power's idea DRY and spitting back ALL the lies of the rich and conservative to the face of the lower classes.. You are putting your faces right in front of the lips of far right fascist and conspirationnist. You are grabbing and strangeling little by little all the media to transform them into apolitical liberal and sometimes conservatives spaces. And you are calling the one group that is trying to stop all of you from abusing the entire society "boot lickers" ?

Oh boi.. do I have some surprises for you...



Sure


"Let's abolish the simplistic left or right issues and let's remplace it by an even much more smartest overnuanced society ! A society where political rethoric is not a question of power, a society where one can be a fascist but still be pro LGBTQ+, a society of extreme reformism, that have but one goal, to change nothing and everything at the SAME TIME !

Let's build the society of tomorrow by explaining that the minorities who fight for gender equalities are just the woke along the way. Who needs them anyway ? Let's be apolitical, no.. Better, let's all be liberal !!!

Let's believe in freedom for all!! Freedom of speech ("and the freedom to say my hate of black people if I want to"), freedom of market ! Freedom; freedom !!
Let's make everyone equal, beginning with the kids who start with the cultural and social capital of ten country leaders ! Everyone is equal in this society and there are NO COLORS ! How can one be stigmatized by the institutions if everyone knows that racism doesn't exist anymore ? And structures of dominations ?? There are gooooooone ! POOOF. Because we said so and because we are all individually making ourself better !! Yes ! Let's promote critical thinking so everyone can see just how smart we are now !
Let's all create our own path !

Begone depression, you don't exist anymore !
Begone poverty, by my will, I banish you !
Begone sexism, we cast you out from the system !"

Begone world.. I made an oopsie

Are you on drugs?

 

[Etzel Andergast]

https://cointelegraph.com/news/argentine-president-provinces-circulate-currencies

Milei is testing austro-libertarian theories

 

[NAMELESS]

Someone tried that in the 40', can't really remember his name though..

Stalin?
[automerge]1705581117[/automerge]

https://cointelegraph.com/news/argentine-president-provinces-circulate-currencies

Milei is testing austro-libertarian theories

Pretty cool!
[automerge]1705581273[/automerge]

Are you on drugs?

He doesn't have much to say much so he makes up random shit. Besides,his head has a few screws loose.

 

[Logiko]

Are you on drugs?

Are you not understanding something ?

Stalin?

You tell, me.

 

[NAMELESS]

Are you not understanding something ?



You tell, me.

If 50% of the population goes missing,there will not be enough tax payers to sustain the likes of you,c4n. You will starve to death.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

All of you are gay

 

[NAMELESS]

All of you are gay

You shouldn't have said that...now c4n will write a wall of text preaching to you.

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

If 50% of the population goes missing,there will not be enough tax payers to sustain the likes of you,c4n. You will starve to death.

It's an incredible take, his.
If he was for a depopulation, where to start if not from the non-productive members of the society?

 

[Logiko]

If 50% of the population goes missing,there will not be enough tax payers to sustain the likes of you,c4n. You will starve to death.

It's an incredible take, his.
If he was for a depopulation, where to start if not from the non-productive members of the society?

Only fascists talks about "taking care" of non-productive member of the society. Your takes are really... strange.

Plus, who is speaking about population going missing ? I'm talking about a process of responsibilization (that should not be enforced) here, not a fascist genocide. People being more active, and more responsible about their environment and therefore understanding that its not viable for all to create extended families.

Which will create a stagnation and perhaps a diminution of the human population over time:

Less humans, less CO2, better planet, better societies, better humans.

But of course, we need all the population of the world for that, so we must be get rid of capitalism first :)

 

[NAMELESS]

It's an incredible take, his.
If he was for a depopulation, where to start if not from the non-productive members of the society?

He said before he wants people to be slaves like him.Now he wants them to be Zombies too lmfao

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

Only fascists talks about "taking care" of non-productive member of the society. Your takes are really... strange.

Plus, who is speaking about population going missing ? I'm talking about a process of responsibilization (that should not be enforced) here, not a fascist genocide. People being more active, and more responsible about their environment and therefore understanding that its not viable for all to create extended families.

Which will create a stagnation and perhaps a diminution of the human population over time:

Less humans, less CO2, better planet, better societies, better humans.

But of course, we need all the population of the world for that, so we must be get rid of capitalism first :)

So you're gonna start by not reproducing right?
Setting the good example, right?
Otherwise you might come across as a big hypocrite.

 

[NAMELESS]

So you're gonna start by not reproducing right?
Setting the good example, right?
Otherwise you might come across as a big hypocrite.

He doesn't care about how people perceive him. He is lonely and wants attention at any cost. Just ignore him.

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

He doesn't care about people perceive him. He is lonely and wants attention at any cost. Just ignore him.

Yeah my mistake, but want to see how he slithers away from this without saying yes.

 

[Jesse Pinkman]

Only fascists talks about "taking care" of non-productive member of the society. Your takes are really... strange.

Plus, who is speaking about population going missing ? I'm talking about a process of responsibilization (that should not be enforced) here, not a fascist genocide. People being more active, and more responsible about their environment and therefore understanding that its not viable for all to create extended families.

Which will create a stagnation and perhaps a diminution of the human population over time:

Less humans, less CO2, better planet, better societies, better humans.

But of course, we need all the population of the world for that, so we must be get rid of capitalism first :)

How will you get rid of Capitalism ??

 

[NAMELESS]

How will you get rid of Capitalism ??

By never getting a job.

 

[Logiko]

He said before he wants people to be slaves like him.Now he wants them to be Zombies too lmfao

Where ?

So you're gonna start by not reproducing right?
Setting the good example, right?
Otherwise you might come across as a big hypocrite.

Its not about stopping the reproduction. Only a child would understand that from what I said. Its about responsibilization and making less children. 1 or two children is fine, 3 or 4 its more debatable..

How will you get rid of Capitalism ??

Step by step, day by day, reforms after reforms.

- Taxing the superprofit to the maximum would be a good first step.
- Before doing anything else, you need to create laws to prevent anyone from gaining wealth over a certain limit. (some say 1 to 2 Million Euro per person)
- After that you might wanna create an universal wage indiscriminataly
- Then you prevent powerful lobbying from having a say in election and medias
- You follow that by an enormous reform of education that will end the ideology of meritocracy
- You allow unions to developp on a large scale
- You create laws to desintegrate fiscal frauds
- You create social reforms to make the system crack in order to give the worker as much power in the production as possible
- You create ethic chart for the use of AI.
- You create reforms to limit the abuse linked to inheritance
- You plan correctly the automation of society
- You create gov. scaled assemblies of scientists and expert on all fields, especially social sciences.
- You create antipatriarcal and antiracists reforms to get rid as much as possible of the systemic sexism and racism in institutions
- You create a new "social capital structure" for children and adults, this will be a structure parrallel to school that will developp the social capitals of children through FREE and subsidize activities.
- You create equity reforms for people to access this previously mentionned "social capital structure". People with less will be priviledged in the access to make sure that even people or children from more excluded background and with less social, economic and cultural capital will be given the same chances.

By now, we should live in a much better, equal and safer society for everyone.. the rest will crack on its own and we will need to make the transition toward a better system.. the question is, which one ?

A better society is possible. But for that, we will make wealthy and powerfull people very angry. And that's why we can only rely on our two allies : Science and the people.

 

[NAMELESS]

Where ?



Its not about stopping the reproduction. Only a child would understand that from what I said. Its about responsibilization and making less children. 1 or two children is fine, 3 or 4 its more debatable..



Step by step, day by day, reforms after reforms.

- Taxing the superprofit to the maximum would be a good first step.
- Before doing anything else, you need to create laws to prevent anyone from gaining wealth over a certain limit. (some say 1 to 2 Million Euro per person)
- After that you might wanna create an universal wage indiscriminataly
- Then you prevent powerful lobbying from having a say in election and medias
- You follow that by an enormous reform of education that will end the ideology of meritocracy
- You allow unions to developp on a large scale
- You create laws to desintegrate fiscal frauds
- You create social reforms to make the system crack in order to give the worker as much power in the production as possible
- You create ethic chart for the use of AI.
- You create reforms to limit the abuse linked to inheritance
- You plan correctly the automation of society
- You create gov. scaled assemblies of scientists and expert on all fields, especially social sciences.
- You create antipatriarcal and antiracists reforms to get rid as much as possible of the systemic sexism and racism in institutions
- You create a new "social capital structure" for children and adults, this will be a structure parrallel to school that will developp the social capitals of children through FREE and subsidize activities.
- You create equity reforms for people to access this previously mentionned "social capital structure". People with less will be priviledged in the access to make sure that even people or children from more excluded background and with less social, economic and cultural capital will be given the same chances.

By now, we should live in a much better, equal and safer society for everyone.. the rest will crack on its own and we will need to make the transition toward a better system.. the question is, which one ?

A better society is possible. But for that, we will make wealthy and powerfull people very angry. And that's why we can only rely on our two allies : Science and the people.

What a clown. Only a cuck would want to create such a poweful state to babe sit them. Back in the days of the Romans,you would either be a thief or slave. Btw,what you proposed would back fire very badly because people would NOT feel the incentive to work and if there is no one producing wealth,then there is no wealth to be re-destributed. All commie nations collapsed economically this way.

 

[Logiko]

Only a cuck

And here lies the entierity of your world vision.
Someone with the incapicity to think beyond the scope of toxic masculinity.

would back fire very badly because people would feel the incentive to work

I think you meant "wouldn't* feel the incentive to work" if not, this sentence doesn't make much sence.

And no, people will not stop feeling the incentive to work, that's a common myth that ignorant conservative have toward the concept of universal income. Oh sure, people will be less focus on labor field but that's why you must add bonuses to the already existing income. But other than that, people will still produce, but will produce better, more efficiantly.

And no, no economy collapsed this way as those reforms and laws were non existent in the first place in those country. You are just falling for the good old anticommunist propaganda. Not very surprising.

 

[NAMELESS]

And here lies the entierity of your world vision.
Someone with the incapicity to think beyond the scope of toxic masculinity.


I think you meant "wouldn't* feel the incentive to work" if not, this sentence doesn't make much sence.

And no, people will not stop feeling the incentive to work, that's a common myth that ignorant conservative have toward the concept of universal income. Oh sure, people will be less focus on labor field but that's why you must add bonuses to the already existing income. But other than that, people will still produce, but will produce better, more efficiantly.

And no, no economy collapsed this way as those reforms and laws were non existent in the first place in those country. You are just falling for the good old anticommunist propaganda. Not very surprising.

"We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us". A common saying in commie nations. Meanwhile,the soviet union is dead and the capitalistic nations have never been this rich in history.

 

[Logiko]

"We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us". A common saying in commie nations. Meanwhile,the soviet union is dead and the capitalistic nations have never been this rich in history.

"Soviet union"
Is that all you have to say when someone gives you actual solutions to get rid of a toxic and ultra dangerous system ?

Let's see if you can do better:

Why do you think that we shouldn't prevent someone from owning MORE than 1 to 2 Million dollars ?