Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang>jurota i refuse to pay my taxes is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real men pay taxes say no to sleepy joe scratch that trump is cooked tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you
My bunny you're wrong. You don't see the racial stereotyping in the examples I brought up?
I'll return this one, you have to learn a thing or two about hidden racism especially outside of western context. Lolda seems to be indifferent to his own country's struggles with internal racism to the point he saw no necessity to represented the indigenous minority of his own country in an arc dedicated to historical Japan. And remember the sbs where he said Usopp would be from "Africa" if here were from the real world? The other strawhats got specific countries of origin instead. You can't make this shit up. No pun intended but you fail to grasp the subtext here, unironically.
Meanwhile you didn't even try to make a point to contradict me you just went and said "lol you're drunk".
And YOU are the one who can't move on and fall for every bait of those neo Nazis in this thread
Kein Ausländisch auf Teutschen Schulhöfen bitte!
I'll return this one, you have to learn a thing or two about hidden racism especially outside of western context. Lolda seems to be indifferent to his own country's struggles with internal racism to the point he saw no necessity to represented the indigenous minority of his own country in an arc dedicated to historical Japan. And remember the sbs where he said Usopp would be from "Africa" if here were from the real world? The other strawhats got specific countries of origin instead. You can't make this shit up. No pun intended but you fail to grasp the subtext here, unironically.
Meanwhile you didn't even try to make a point to contradict me you just went and said "lol you're drunk".
And YOU are the one who can't move on and fall for every bait of those neo Nazis in this thread
Kein Ausländisch auf Teutschen Schulhöfen bitte!
There are none.
You know what would be stereotypical and dehumanizing ? If Oda tried to promote the retrograde and colonialist ideas that those two populations are "savages" and uneducated. Those things would be an example of promotion of dehumanization and stereotyping of native populations.
But that's not what happens. In both cases, the population is educated, smart, courageous and allies. And in one of those cases, the population is fighting oppression.
So you tell me. What do you find stereotypical in those cases ? What do you feel is hurting the memories and current images of the native populations here ?
There is no such thing as "hidden racism" unless you are talking about internalized racism which is a real thing. Racism is an ideology transformed into a system of domination. We are all racist because we all live in a systemic racist society.
What are you even talking about here ?
Indeed .. That's a common colonialist things that people in colonial societies (and their allies) tends to do. Its not specific to Oda, that's how the majority of the people coming from colonialist countries think when they don't take time to think : Africa as a country.
Noone is immune to having colonialist and racist bias and saying dumb stuff.. Oda is not an exception. But we are not talking about what he said, we are talking about what he wrote and draw. And on that front, there are only problems of representations (meaning very few people of color), but racist and colonialist stereotypes.. surprisingly not so much.
Indeed. Because there needs to be someone contradicting them. If no one is stepping in to contradict them, new people coming here will think that what they say is something normal on this forum when its not the case.
Nop. That's a wrong statement.
Science is not neutral, its progressive by nature by the fact that it tries to uncover mysteries and understand reality but also because its done by humans. You can't be neutral, even when doing science. Those who make science are human and therefore they will bring human biases with them.
I demonstrated how it can happen in late december by giving you researched paper on the bias in science concerning the place and the value given to women in this discipline. If you change the scientist, you wil also change the vision of science and how the scientist will work. Therefore science as a discipline that can't be neutral. Its human.
And it shouldn't be neutral, it must stay human because being human is what keep scientific research to stay ethical. If science was neutral, there wouldn't be any problem for scientist to blow the world with atomic bombs to understand the effects, there wouldn't be any problems for scientist to test on human subjects. Science without ethical bias would be chaos.
You know what would be stereotypical and dehumanizing ? If Oda tried to promote the retrograde and colonialist ideas that those two populations are "savages" and uneducated. Those things would be an example of promotion of dehumanization and stereotyping of native populations.
But that's not what happens. In both cases, the population is educated, smart, courageous and allies. And in one of those cases, the population is fighting oppression.
So you tell me. What do you find stereotypical in those cases ? What do you feel is hurting the memories and current images of the native populations here ?
There is no such thing as "hidden racism" unless you are talking about internalized racism which is a real thing. Racism is an ideology transformed into a system of domination. We are all racist because we all live in a systemic racist society.
What are you even talking about here ?
Indeed .. That's a common colonialist things that people in colonial societies (and their allies) tends to do. Its not specific to Oda, that's how the majority of the people coming from colonialist countries think when they don't take time to think : Africa as a country.
Noone is immune to having colonialist and racist bias and saying dumb stuff.. Oda is not an exception. But we are not talking about what he said, we are talking about what he wrote and draw. And on that front, there are only problems of representations (meaning very few people of color), but racist and colonialist stereotypes.. surprisingly not so much.
Indeed. Because there needs to be someone contradicting them. If no one is stepping in to contradict them, new people coming here will think that what they say is something normal on this forum when its not the case.
Nop. That's a wrong statement.
Science is not neutral, its progressive by nature by the fact that it tries to uncover mysteries and understand reality but also because its done by humans. You can't be neutral, even when doing science. Those who make science are human and therefore they will bring human biases with them.
I demonstrated how it can happen in late december by giving you researched paper on the bias in science concerning the place and the value given to women in this discipline. If you change the scientist, you wil also change the vision of science and how the scientist will work. Therefore science as a discipline that can't be neutral. Its human.
And it shouldn't be neutral, it must stay human because being human is what keep scientific research to stay ethical. If science was neutral, there wouldn't be any problem for scientist to blow the world with atomic bombs to understand the effects, there wouldn't be any problems for scientist to test on human subjects. Science without ethical bias would be chaos.
trump ran on hating the system
calling all the media fake news, he was the furthest you can get from status quo whilie still being a rich billionaire
when your in the online space pretty much everyone has some justication for their beliefs
flat earthers will tell me that verse 88 or whatever is proof
it's up to the person if you accept such a source as biased or not
im going to say the bible is more of a story not really a objective piece of data hence the flat earther's evidence not being valid to me
it's the same with you, liberals agreeing with other liberals just aint solid evidence to me if that upsets people then ig it does
who cares
if you count gender studies shit yea but im not counting a liberal arts degree as a science
science is defined as a study of nature and besides it's not something really data driven like study of animals or stars
alot of claims in such fields are very easy to prove without resorting to im a liberal so cope
i dont need to be right wing or left wing to accept stars exist, it's not the same case with leftist college degrees
Post automatically merged:
sheeeet
where did you get your pfp
Post automatically merged:
sheeeet
where did you get your pfp
