We are tired. Too many cops get away with shit like this because in a lot of cases, they are allowed to investigate themselves. Even body cam footage doesn't stop them because its a very common practice and a lot of times, the body cam footage is never released to the public or if it is, its years later and the officers involved have already gotten off. We could have a better vetting process for the people we put in these positions of power but that won't happen because everyone above them is just as corrupt if not more so.
We are tired. Too many cops get away with shit like this because in a lot of cases, they are allowed to investigate themselves. Even body cam footage doesn't stop them because its a very common practice and a lot of times, the body cam footage is never released to the public or if it is, its years later and the officers involved have already gotten off. We could have a better vetting process for the people we put in these positions of power but that won't happen because everyone above them is just as corrupt if not more so.
You can't blame a mass of a group for the acts of a few. Where is that at? It's supposed to be illegal for them to investigate themselves. If it's a local agency, the state is supposed to lead the investigation, same as, if there is a criminal investigation into say a sus death of a spouse of a cop, their agency isn't allowed to lead.
Post automatically merged:
Oh apparently this happened around me. I gotta look into it.
Post automatically merged:
Ok. So the event happened in Jefferson Parish two to three years ago. The suspect himself came out and claimed that the pills in the back were in fact, his and that they were taken from him before the video. He said he was remorseful for not only biting an officer, but also for the deputy who got accused of planting evidence. The man said he owned up to his mistakes because he didn't want to continue spreading false rumors about what happened.
You can't blame a mass of a group for the acts of a few. Where is that at? It's supposed to be illegal for them to investigate themselves. If it's a local agency, the state is supposed to lead the investigation, same as, if there is a criminal investigation into say a sus death of a spouse of a cop, their agency isn't allowed to lead.
Post automatically merged:
Oh apparently this happened around me. I gotta look into it.
Post automatically merged:
Ok. So the event happened in Jefferson Parish two to three years ago. The suspect himself came out and claimed that the pills in the back were in fact, his and that they were taken from him before the video. He said he was remorseful for not only biting an officer, but also for the deputy who got accused of planting evidence. The man said he owned up to his mistakes because he didn't want to continue spreading false rumors about what happened.
If all that is true then that's fine and well but then we would have to explain all of these cases too.
No one's blaming the majority for the actions of a few but there are far more than a few bad apples as people would have you believe. The corruption runs deep.
If all that is true then that's fine and well but then we would have to explain all of these cases too.
No one's blaming the majority for the actions of a few but there are far more than a few bad apples as people would have you believe. The corruption runs deep.
I know there are bad cops. I just am saying it's unhealthy to jump to a conclusion without knowing the facts behind it.
IE the first video you showed that was tagged with false information could cause unfounded riots and protests that will in turn hurt innocent people. It's always best to be late to speak, so you know your information is accurate than to rush to a conclusion and be wrong especially when it can have harmful consequences. I make it a habit to investigate any narrative that I'm shown.
Now I will check out what you just shared.
Post automatically merged:
1st case: Erikson - Not shocked coming out of New York. We are talking about a state that doesn't believe black people are capable of getting IDs. Also, they should have been prosecuted harder than what they got. 1.) For harming 2.) for feeding the narrative of bad cops In short he had gotten in trouble several times for similar things, even the last time, wasn't much more than a slap on the wrist.
2nd Case: No crime here. The cops were assholes but the guy could have made the situation easier. He should have filed a complaint afterward instead of instigating it. Which would have led to the same outcome of the officer being fired. I know this isn't how it should be, but it is easier for the suspects themselves to fight it in court than on the side of the road.
3rd Case: I give props to the "suspect" because he kept his cool in a very uncomfortable situation. Can't say I disagree with the recourse the officer faced. Unsure, if I agree with him not being fired, but I am cool with it if said officer was instructed to take retraining.
4th Case: From the video itself, the resisting arrest was fair because he did admit to it which he said he started when they tried to pull him out of the car. I think this one is missing details. I get the dude's reaction. I used to always get aggressive when I was pulled over or arrested. Don't think there was a time I wasn't an asshole.
Post automatically merged:
An injustice I find in our system that falls on poor people, those without families to fight for them is the lack of interest in solving murders committed against those groups.
If you don't have a name or money behind you and you fall into drug usage or careers deemed unsavory to make money, they don't appear to me at least to want to invest funds into investigating the crime.
When I was 17 my friend was murdered, she came from a bad background and had turned to using drugs way before then. All these years have passed and they still haven't found who did it. It was a violent murder, so there had to be evidence in the home. I could go on and on how the crime or investigation didn't make sense but I would literally have to type forever.
The one thing I know. If it was me, who happened to get involved in drugs and I was murdered they would've caught them in a week because of my family and name even if they had to bring in outside sources to solve it.
We are tired. Too many cops get away with shit like this because in a lot of cases, they are allowed to investigate themselves. Even body cam footage doesn't stop them because its a very common practice and a lot of times, the body cam footage is never released to the public or if it is, its years later and the officers involved have already gotten off. We could have a better vetting process for the people we put in these positions of power but that won't happen because everyone above them is just as corrupt if not more so.
I know there are bad cops. I just am saying it's unhealthy to jump to a conclusion without knowing the facts behind it.
IE the first video you showed that was tagged with false information could cause unfounded riots and protests that will in turn hurt innocent people. It's always best to be late to speak, so you know your information is accurate than to rush to a conclusion and be wrong especially when it can have harmful consequences. I make it a habit to investigate any narrative that I'm shown.
Now I will check out what you just shared.
Post automatically merged:
1st case: Erikson - Not shocked coming out of New York. We are talking about a state that doesn't believe black people are capable of getting IDs. Also, they should have been prosecuted harder than what they got. 1.) For harming 2.) for feeding the narrative of bad cops In short he had gotten in trouble several times for similar things, even the last time, wasn't much more than a slap on the wrist.
2nd Case: No crime here. The cops were assholes but the guy could have made the situation easier. He should have filed a complaint afterward instead of instigating it. Which would have led to the same outcome of the officer being fired. I know this isn't how it should be, but it is easier for the suspects themselves to fight it in court than on the side of the road.
3rd Case: I give props to the "suspect" because he kept his cool in a very uncomfortable situation. Can't say I disagree with the recourse the officer faced. Unsure, if I agree with him not being fired, but I am cool with it if said officer was instructed to take retraining.
4th Case: From the video itself, the resisting arrest was fair because he did admit to it which he said he started when they tried to pull him out of the car. I think this one is missing details. I get the dude's reaction. I used to always get aggressive when I was pulled over or arrested. Don't think there was a time I wasn't an asshole.
Post automatically merged:
An injustice I find in our system that falls on poor people, those without families to fight for them is the lack of interest in solving murders committed against those groups.
If you don't have a name or money behind you and you fall into drug usage or careers deemed unsavory to make money, they don't appear to me at least to want to invest funds into investigating the crime.
When I was 17 my friend was murdered, she came from a bad background and had turned to using drugs way before then. All these years have passed and they still haven't found who did it. It was a violent murder, so there had to be evidence in the home. I could go on and on how the crime or investigation didn't make sense but I would literally have to type forever.
The one thing I know. If it was me, who happened to get involved in drugs and I was murdered they would've caught them in a week because of my family and name even if they had to bring in outside sources to solve it.
If Trump actually wins this November I'm anticipating a riot during the weeks after.
Not the kind where the rioters stormed the capital building and yet did jack squat but the kind where public buildings and businesses start burning and bystanders get fucked up bad if they ever manage to get caught outside during a mob frenzy.
There are already attempts of interference. That is what all these trials against Trump are for. Like the one or two people in these states attempting to remove Trump from the ballot telling people who they can or cannot vote for. I expect the Supreme Court to come back unanimously that states can not remove a candidate from the ballot because it's against the Constitution.
There are already attempts of interference. That is what all these trials against Trump are for. Like the one or two people in these states attempting to remove Trump from the ballot telling people who they can or cannot vote for. I expect the Supreme Court to come back unanimously that states can not remove a candidate from the ballot because it's against the Constitution.
I would bet the Democrats in the Supreme Court are screaming right now watching their side hand Trump the election by trying to twist and rewrite the Constitution, which has opened up people's eyes.
Post automatically merged:
My belief is Trump wouldn't even be on the road to being elected again if the left didn't start pursuing these frivolous charges and claims. It's made him the underdog and has resonated with people who have felt beaten down by the system for decades. It's also scary too, if they can make these charges stick to such a rich and powerful man, what can they do to us ordinary people? Desantis would be on Trump's current road to the election if none of this happened.
Trump getting cornered from all sides here. Trump getting hit with charges (tax fraud?) from all sides and you got the occasional raep callout that got flung out from the catapault by E. Jean Carroll...
Wow! Sensational! Such words intended to make those you don't like look bad (an understatement)!
You guys remember that Jonathan Majors incident where he got accused of SA and domestic abuse (he ended up being innocent in that case btw)? It's a shame that the callout tactic is so effective even if the perpetrator was actually innocent because the consequences of such accusations are dire.
It's a shame that the callout tactic is so effective even if the perpetrator was actually innocent because the consequences of such accusations are dire.
It seems recently that black actor who used to play Kang was condeem of raep. But not so long ago Johnny Deep was falsely accused by Amber Head.
Here in "Brazil" (actually Italy and Spanish) we had football players condeemed of that too but not long ago we had Neymar falsely accused.
Those false accusations are harmful to the real victims and not brought up enough. The "me too" culture we had some years ago helped many women to false accuse innocent men because they could simply destroy their lives without having to prove anything.
And I'm unaware of the consequences those women faces for falsely accusing. I've heard someone suggesting that they should face the consequences that man would face if those accusations were true.
If Trump actually wins this November I'm anticipating a riot during the weeks after.
Not the kind where the rioters stormed the capital building and yet did jack squat but the kind where public buildings and businesses start burning and bystanders get fucked up bad if they ever manage to get caught outside during a mob frenzy.
If Trump actually wins this November I'm anticipating a riot during the weeks after.
Not the kind where the rioters stormed the capital building and yet did jack squat but the kind where public buildings and businesses start burning and bystanders get fucked up bad if they ever manage to get caught outside during a mob frenzy.
As someone outside the US, the Trump issue is weird. It looks like democrats are trying to throw everything they can against him and are even willing to indulge in election interference and this will cause the opposite effect. After listening to some of his speeches and looking at some things (like the CNN interview) he seems like a competent candidate, specially because his time in office was actually not that bad for the US, specially when compared with Biden. No matter the candidate I hope they fix their borders issues soon before more tragedies happen.
About reap, this will not be fixed in the foreseeable future. Mostly, because women don't want that and actively block any attempts to fix the issue (just like fixing alimony and paternity issues).
Note that in most of those cases the victim wasn't in Brazil at the time and the accusation came way later. This is important because in Brazil when someone is even suspected of being victim of abuse she MUST be taken to the hospital, take the necessary medication and be examined. This diminishes the number of actual false reports of raep. This does not mean that woman don't try but when they are taken to the hospital they usually change their ''narratives'' to accusations of domestic violence. If they do falsely accuse a men of crime it is usually not to the police but to their neighbors or even some gangues in order to have them killed or crippled.
This is one of the reasons why the number of domestic violence cases are so high in Brazil, because -while they do happen- woman usually can't falsely accuse men of raep without getting caught before the charges are filled and violence usually does the trick.
Filling false charges is a crime (341CPP) but rarely someone bothers with it if the one doing it is a woman. At the same time, the chances of a police officer giving a shit about domestic violence cases aren't that high either.
Trump's presidency was better for the world overall because he isn't a warmonger like our previous leaders and our current Biden and wanted to focus on making home better than he wanted to take other countries' oil when we have our own. He isn't a politician, which is why he was rejected not only by the Democrats but the Republicans too, which also is the reason he drew in so many everyday people.
Trump's presidency was better for the world overall because he isn't a warmonger like our previous leaders and our current Biden and wanted to focus on making home better than he wanted to take other countries' oil when we have our own. He isn't a politician, which is why he was rejected not only by the Democrats but the Republicans too, which also is the reason he drew in so many everyday people.
The similarities with Bolsonaro are absurd. Although Bolsonaro is a politician (I guess 30+ years as politician) he never passed a law of his own because he never sold himself to the corrupted system.
But both are far from being perfect (although both are far better than the current ones in US and Brazil). Trump has a weird and suspiscious relationship and statements towards Russia. Although there wasn't any new war during his governament his statements of not willing to help Ukraine/Israel on their current wars is very concerning. Also his speechs towards NATO countries although I agree with his complain he shouldn't say something that go against the agreetment of it and specially saying he would incentivate Russia to go against them because US wouldn't help a bit.
Is the same thing with Bolsonaro, from time to time he just said SHIT that make people concern about his ideas and decisions and to go against him.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.