also, did you by any chance watch the vid i shared? and if so, can you tell me the political intent of every joke in there? since you suggested that jokes are always political or something along that line
No. The reasoning is logical. When bad people want to do bad things you want to know what the other people's response will be and he's not afraid of Biden. I mean Putin can still talk in full sentences....Biden not so much. I mean the highest expectation the world has for Biden is he has a pulse. That's a very low bar. That's why he's a joke not only to Russia but almost every other country.
But that’s not how I see here in Ground reality it’s fact Biden responded fast and Putin who expected Kiev to fall in 2 weeks and war is ongoing .
I think you saw Tucker’s interview , Putin likes to spin and sugarcoat laced with his own facts .
Again I certainly overall agree Biden is no longer suitable for office . He certainly needs to retire but it looks like he is planning to raise Kamala Harris as successor I certainly think she is not suitable to be president.
But surely come on Trump has historically had business ties with Russia which republicans have so far chose to ignore but again I hope he doesn’t play into Vlad’s hand when he becomes President .
But that’s not how I see here in Ground reality it’s fact Biden responded fast and Putin who expected Kiev to fall in 2 weeks and war is ongoing .
I think you saw Tucker’s interview , Putin likes to spin and sugarcoat laced with his own facts .
Again I certainly overall agree Biden is no longer suitable for office . He certainly needs to retire but it looks like he is planning to raise Kamala Harris as successor I certainly think she is not suitable to be president.
But surely come on Trump has historically had business ties with Russia which republicans have so far chose to ignore but again I hope he doesn’t play into Vlad’s hand when he becomes President .
I did see that clip when he said that. I'm not a huge fan of Tucker but I did watch the first part of his interview with Chris Cuomo this morning and enjoyed seeing two people with such different views, laughing like friends.
I think you keep side-stepping the fact that this would've never happened if Trump was in office—no—if anyone else was in office besides Biden and his like-minded people. That is the actual reality of the situation. Though if people like people in office who always have conflicts under their watch. I guess I can see how people might think his response was great. This is making a fortune for our weapon makers. Which is what American is great for, investing in conflicts for oil and to make money off these events. So, yes I guess Biden's administration is happy with the outcome.
Post automatically merged:
Nothing to see here- Raytheon contributed half a million dollars to Biden's campaign. I wonder who makes most of these weapons we send/sell to people. Raytheon.
Post automatically merged:
I'm gonna leave this sexy white man here. I find him very intelligent and even though I don't always agree with him. He always makes me think.
Criticize them. Explain why its easy, most of the time oppressive and not really qualitative to laugh at the expense of the oppressed and why laughing about people in power ia a much more couragous and tricky thing to do.
also, did you by any chance watch the vid i shared? and if so, can you tell me the political intent of every joke in there? since you suggested that jokes are always political or something along that line
Choices of jokes talking ABOUT oppressed people are political not random jokes about random stuff, I didn't see only those kind of joke there. There could be multiple reason, here it could be to push the limit of what is acceptable for example.
Ideally, I think the intention is not to hurt innocent people. I know the reality is different than that. But also ideally, there wouldn't be need for violent conflict, but reality says there will always be bad people hidden in every single type of organized group.
You wouldn't believe for how many people killing and committing genocide is not the incentive to join the army, their main focus eventually is job security and pay and they try tob dissociate from the fact they're harming real human beings. Gets even easier if the targets have a different religion and/or appearance.
You wouldn't believe for how many people killing and committing genocide is not the incentive to join the army, their main focus eventually is job security and pay and they try tob dissociate from the fact they're harming real human beings. Gets even easier if the targets have a different religion and/or appearance.
I would hope no one's intention of joining their country's military is the purpose of killing and would hope it is a desire to defend their country and the things they believe in. I get the job security, etc. as well, but it's reasonable to assume if you sign up you might be sent into war. So, anyone who signs up without understanding that is possible, might not be very smart.
I would hope no one's intention of joining their country's military is the purpose of killing and would hope it is a desire to defend their country and the things they believe in.
How does one "defend their country" by leaving said country, flying across a whole ocean and shooting at people that have nothing to do with your country? Make it make sense
How does one "defend their country" by leaving said country, flying across a whole ocean and shooting at people that have nothing to do with your country? Make it make sense
What conflict are you specifically talking about? Are you talking about retaliations conflicts outside their country or? Are you talking about attacking for some purpose other than being attacked first? There is a difference in those two scenarios.
I would hope no one's intention of joining their country's military is the purpose of killing and would hope it is a desire to defend their country and the things they believe in.
How does one "defend their country" by leaving said country, flying across a whole ocean and shooting at people that have nothing to do with your country? Make it make sense
What conflict are you specifically talking about? Are you talking about retaliations conflicts outside their country or? Are you talking about attacking for some purpose other than being attacked first? There is a difference in those two scenarios.
Call me bad/evil or whatever. I am not against a country going after someone who attacked them on their land as long after they actually go after the people who did it and do not use it as an excuse to go after innocent people because they have something they want. It's like in any scenario if you take something and let people walk over you, you send a message to everyone that they can keep doing it because there will be no repercussions.
Call me bad/evil or whatever. I am not against a country going after someone who attacked them on their land as long after they actually go after the people who did it and do not use it as an excuse to go after innocent people because they have something they want. It's like in any scenario if you take something and let people walk over you, you send a message to everyone that they can keep doing it because there will be no repercussions.
I support no terrorist. You can twist whatever I say how you want but you'll never change the meaning of it. Like 9/11 no matter how you look at it was an evil act because those people targeted did nothing. The Oklahoma bombing an evil act. The thing at the Grande concert an evil act. They all were done with the intention of hurting innocent people.
Post automatically merged:
Also before you say I have defended stuff the US has done. If you read what I said yesterday, I said our government likes to profit off of conflict. So, no I do not believe the US is a golden child.
I would hope no one's intention of joining their country's military is the purpose of killing and would hope it is a desire to defend their country and the things they believe in.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
