Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You mean when you're deemed mentally unfit? Then that should extend to 'at home'. With an individual who is of sound ability to own a gun goes outside with it illegally, then that is a calculated risk; allowing someone who has clear psychological issues to have a gun at home is not.
We cannot infringe on freedom in favour of "protection". It is nothing but authoritarianism. Besides, those who mean you harm will always find a way, weapon prohibition or no.
We cannot infringe on freedom in favour of "protection". It is nothing but authoritarianism. Besides, those who mean you harm will always find a way, weapon prohibition or no.
Then we're opposed on that point. Ultimately, I don't think prohibiting weapons makes the world safer. Just gives despots the chance to be armed when you cannot be.
As for conditions? I'm torn on that. Probably a myriad of personality disorders (primarily cluster-B ones), Dementia (as I have worked with dementia patients), and anything that causes audible or visual hallucinations. I guess anything that functions as a major impairment to cognitive thinking would also be under this umbrella?
As for conditions? I'm torn on that. Probably a myriad of personality disorders (primarily cluster-B ones), Dementia (as I have worked with dementia patients), and anything that causes audible or visual hallucinations. I guess anything that functions as a major impairment to cognitive thinking would also be under this umbrella?
Social politics are meant to prevent men from having this behavior in the first place mate. There is a sociological reason behind those behaviors they are not random social artefacts.
You have a hard time understanding what I say, let me be more precise.
Technology can't exist without someone managing it in the first place. This means that technology is just a tool.
This tool is neutral. But NOT the human behind it. So, if human are acting with bad ethics, the tool will be used to do bad things and will therefore bring apocalypse. On the contrary, if the human behind the tools are acting with very good ethics, the tool will be used to do very good things.
The point is that without good ethics (and therefore good politics) the technology will be use badly and can't bring good things.
So if you want more social and economical progress its possible but its not technology that you must focus on, but good politics.
Indeed. More prevention are needed. Having guns is not a basic human right.
You have a hard time understanding what I say, let me be more precise.
Technology can't exist without someone managing it in the first place. This means that technology is just a tool.
This tool is neutral. But NOT the human behind it. So, if human are acting with bad ethics, the tool will be used to do bad things and will therefore bring apocalypse. On the contrary, if the human behind the tools are acting with very good ethics, the tool will be used to do very good things.
The point is that without good ethics (and therefore good politics) the technology will be use badly and can't bring good things.
So if you want more social and economical progress its possible but its not technology that you must focus on, but good politics.
Indeed. More prevention are needed. Having guns is not a basic human right.
No. Its an open window to very toxic behaviors.
Gun are meant to kill, not to protect ourself. Creating the right for carrying firearm is explanation that nothing can be done politically to prevent insecurity to happen. This is not acceptable. We must fight insecurity by politics and not by violence.
We need hardcore gun control in the world.
Gun are meant to kill, not to protect ourself. Creating the right for carrying firearm is explanation that nothing can be done politically to prevent insecurity to happen. This is not acceptable. We must fight insecurity by politics and not by violence.
We need hardcore gun control in the world.
It heavily depends on the society. Some other countries in Europe have similarly lax gun laws as the US yet they had no mass shooting issues before the constant news reports on US shootings gave rise to copycat shooters. A healthy society doesn't produce hundreds of mentally instable individuals who want to kill others for no apparent reason.
Humans always defended themselves. Its completely natural
Post automatically merged:
Humans always defended themselves. Its completely natural