Controversial General Political Discussion

[Bisoromi Bear]

the big mustache guy that @Bisoromi Bear hates with all of his heart

Who?

 

[NAMELESS]

For Vikings etc robbery was a business model.

Not among themselves.

 

[AL sama]

By killing you mean murder or self defense?

both

 

[Indigo]

More like in the Crucible. Pre-Golden Order(Moses) days.

bro i just got called a man child for talking about Elden Ring

be careful

 

[NAMELESS]

so comedy stops a person from being an adult?

low level baits and trolls posts are immature.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

There is a famous anthropologist who came with "no killing, no incest and no eating human flesh" as rules established in every societies. At least you could have tried with that instead of the 10 commandmants which are 100% judeo-christian

Absolute bs.
Killing and cannibalism are pretty much a staple of most ancient societies.

 

[Mathias]

Who?

"I am not human, I am dynamite"

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

so comedy stops a person from being an adult?

Yes. Adults can't have legal laughing rights.

 

[Indigo]

low level baits and trolls posts are immature.

i would argue using an anime forum to talk about religion and morality, while using an anime avi made by a most likely pedo immature

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

"I am not human, I am dynamite"

Oh right, you mean Hitler

 

[Mathias]

Oh right, you mean Hitler

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

i would argue using an anime forum to talk about religion and morality, while using an anime avi made by a most likely pedo immature

Ironic considering his vocal opposition against Lerrera

 

[Etzel Andergast]

I get your point but did you understand what I meant??

killing is considered wrong but in some cases its also right

so there's no objective morality

that is not a problem for a moral realist. The moral realist can say "kill is bad" is a proposition that is valid or true for x cases, but for anothers cases the proposition is false.

 

[NAMELESS]

both

We kill to survive. People murder out of the evil in their hearts. Killing in self defense is necessary,but it still is a tragedy regardless if the one defending themselves is right. So yeah, as i see it, killing people is always a bad thing, even though it might be necessary. I say its a tragedy, because in an ideal world, people would never have to resort to this level of violence. I think most would agree with me on this.

 

[Indigo]

Ironic considering his vocal opposition against Lerrera

that's actually hilarious

i didn't even notice this

NAMELESS using an Evangelion avi

talking about the commandments and shit

you know "don't make false idols" and stuff

and the Evangelion author literally said he used all the angels and biblical designs because he thought it looked cool, and that's it

 

[Uncle Van]

Theft ,adultery ,rape ,muder and so on... Those were defined as wrong way before you were a thing,they will be wrong after you are gone and its possible that it is ingrained in your genes that you detest these things. How is it exactly you created your own moral code?

Ok? Never said I created my own. I said have my own morals and dont need religion to be moral.

Morality is taught. Most young boys are taught that it wrong to hit girls under any circumstances. My morals say to smack the shit outta anyone who does me harm.

bro i just got called a man child for talking about Elden Ring

be careful

MAY CHAOS. TAKE. TH-*cough*

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

We kill to survive. People murder out of the evil in their hearts. Killing in self defense is necessary,but it still is a tragedy regardless if the one defending themselves is right.

The issue here lies within the impossibility to objectively define what constitutes murder, self defense, killing to survive

 

[NAMELESS]

i would argue using an anime forum to talk about religion and morality, while using an anime avi made by a most likely pedo immature

If you don't want to have a debate in good faith,then fuck you. I'm not wasting my time with the likes of you and solis.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

So yeah, as i see it, killing people is always a bad thing, even though it might be necessary. I say its a tragedy, because in an ideal world, people would never have to resort to this level of violence. I think most would agree with me on this.

I miss the objectivity in this statement

 

[Etzel Andergast]

anyway, this wiki article is good to introduce to every metaethical position and discussion in contemporary ethics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaethics

there is also this SEP article https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaethics/