Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
no I am not. I literally spent most of the past couple of pages shitting on right wingers.
Conservatives aren't liberals, and far right nuts arent' as well. Just because I include the same flavor but from the left in my disdain doesn't mean I don't know which one is more dangerous. I can walk and chew gum at the same time
Conservatives aren't liberals, and far right nuts arent' as well. Just because I include the same flavor but from the left in my disdain doesn't mean I don't know which one is more dangerous. I can walk and chew gum at the same time
Dealing with tax doesn't make you far right. And only the Supreme Court can be blamed for Roe v Wade, which fell due to the most stupid constitution semantics in the case 
Either way I do not think you know what far-right means, we all expected a crazy term from him and it was nothing out of the ordinary for US politics.
Either way I do not think you know what far-right means, we all expected a crazy term from him and it was nothing out of the ordinary for US politics.
Yeah imagine to have the gall to call out anyone about "not knowing shit about politics" after that comparison of murdering a terrorist org leader and a foreign government official, like goddamn the average population always proves to be so dumb i'm sometimes starting to sympathize with that ancient extreme meritocratic aristocrat Plato. At least his critics explaining in part his disdain for Democracy (besides his philosophic mentor getting executed through street tribunals for some bs accusations) were absolutely spot on 2.000+ years later.
The liberal and conservative mainstream medias and far right conservatives created him. Nothing really fancy..
Typical liberal BS
Of course there is place for political violence. Politic itself is CONFLICT.
We just need to stop at killing or injuring people. Without the political violence of the past, this guy wouldn't be able to speak today.
People's entire existences are threaten by the arrival of Trump in power mate.
So yes, I can understand why some would prefer to see him neutralized.
This is not the solution, but you need to understand what a threat Trump really is.
No one deserves to die
Don't be so sure, If have seen more accelerationnist in the liberal camp than in the marxist one. The liberals themself in power ARE accelerationnist (Macron is one example)
You are targeting the wrong guys mate. Educate yourself.
I'm sorry what ?
No its not.
There is a sociological reason for that. The classical rightist parties have radicalized themselves toward the far right.
Social democrates went the same way and are now the real rightist
With the arrival of Internet and 9/11, the overton windows shifted toward the right drastically in the entire world.
If you are willing to make compromise with racism, sexism or transphobia then yes, you are on the extrem side. Its not the normal and republican side.
Or maybe you are unaware of the reality that is fascism, I've explained clearly how you can, from a simple far right gov, fall into fascism without even noticing it.
We are not throwing the word "fascist" because there is no reason to. We do it because we are informed on the danger of the far right for the institutions and countries.
Yes he is. That's a documented fact.
If you can't see that, you are blind.
Typical liberal BS
Of course there is place for political violence. Politic itself is CONFLICT.
We just need to stop at killing or injuring people. Without the political violence of the past, this guy wouldn't be able to speak today.
People's entire existences are threaten by the arrival of Trump in power mate.
So yes, I can understand why some would prefer to see him neutralized.
This is not the solution, but you need to understand what a threat Trump really is.
No one deserves to die
Don't be so sure, If have seen more accelerationnist in the liberal camp than in the marxist one. The liberals themself in power ARE accelerationnist (Macron is one example)
You are targeting the wrong guys mate. Educate yourself.
I'm sorry what ?
No its not.
There is a sociological reason for that. The classical rightist parties have radicalized themselves toward the far right.
Social democrates went the same way and are now the real rightist
With the arrival of Internet and 9/11, the overton windows shifted toward the right drastically in the entire world.
If you are willing to make compromise with racism, sexism or transphobia then yes, you are on the extrem side. Its not the normal and republican side.
Or maybe you are unaware of the reality that is fascism, I've explained clearly how you can, from a simple far right gov, fall into fascism without even noticing it.
We are not throwing the word "fascist" because there is no reason to. We do it because we are informed on the danger of the far right for the institutions and countries.
Yes he is. That's a documented fact.
If you can't see that, you are blind.
Are you this dumb? Sulemani was not a terrorist? Tf are you saying? He was an Iranian government official. It brought us closer to war with them than ever.
For you to be shameless enough to accuse anyone of not knowing about politics when all you do is support a guy that you like based on vibes instead of policy is unbelievable yet extremely predictable.
For you to be shameless enough to accuse anyone of not knowing about politics when all you do is support a guy that you like based on vibes instead of policy is unbelievable yet extremely predictable.
Again missing the point, social policy of contention needn't be codified into law as you wish it was, especially something as patently divisive as abortion, who's support sees utter loyalty from one set of demographics and indifference at best, to opposition at worst, from another, which here would prefer me not elaborate on