Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
If you are a fan of the financial protection bureau, the EPA, social security or Medicare, reproductive rights, then it doesn’t bode well for you. All the polling indicates that young people care deeply about these issues. Trump has been openly hostile against all these institutions and policies. But if you fuck with his vibes then ig that’s good enough.
Yeah, and my guy destroyed the financial protection bureau. One of the few good things that Biden did was restore it to its former self. He appointed two justices which ultimately brought the downfall of Roe v Wade. And he already has plans to gut the EPA. So yeah, not really good if you actually care about policy.
My man, let me put it plainly, I don’t give a fuck if he looks hard or not. That’s not at the crux of my politics. I care about policy.
Post automatically merged:
My man, let me put it plainly, I don’t give a fuck if he looks hard or not. That’s not at the crux of my politics. I care about policy.
What kind of knowledge?
You're about to say "about the material world", to which I reiterate is a TYPE OF KNOWLEDGE
What does the process of logic result in, genius?
Let me draw a comparison with science to something similar, to further my point
Calculation, is reason as pertains to mathematical truths, such as that 1 + 1 = 2
Science, is reason as pertains to empircal
truths, such as that the moon can be observed to travel in cycles
Both calculation and science are methods of logic, which lead to a specific type of knowledge
Thus science cannot be divorced from abstraction, since science relies on declaring something as true/false, is/isn't
And since abstraction is existence without matter, materialism is false, since not only material but abstract truths exist
To deny that abstract truths exist, knowledge & logic cease to exist, thus reason ceases to exist, and thus science
You're about to say "about the material world", to which I reiterate is a TYPE OF KNOWLEDGE
What does the process of logic result in, genius?
Let me draw a comparison with science to something similar, to further my point
Calculation, is reason as pertains to mathematical truths, such as that 1 + 1 = 2
Science, is reason as pertains to empircal
truths, such as that the moon can be observed to travel in cycles
Both calculation and science are methods of logic, which lead to a specific type of knowledge
Thus science cannot be divorced from abstraction, since science relies on declaring something as true/false, is/isn't
And since abstraction is existence without matter, materialism is false, since not only material but abstract truths exist
To deny that abstract truths exist, knowledge & logic cease to exist, thus reason ceases to exist, and thus science
No mate. That's what you don't get.
Science is a methodology to ACQUIRE knowledge its not knowledge itself.
No lol.
Logic is a methodology to PROCESS knowledge, its not knowledge either.
Science relies more on a practice than reason or logic (even tho those are tools). Again, science is a methodology.
Materialism (in the actual context) is literally the application of scientific knowledge mate.
I think you don't understand what we are talking about here.
I wouldn't be so sure
Remember that the same luck is applying to that guy:
Science is a methodology to ACQUIRE knowledge its not knowledge itself.
No lol.
Logic is a methodology to PROCESS knowledge, its not knowledge either.
Science relies more on a practice than reason or logic (even tho those are tools). Again, science is a methodology.
Materialism (in the actual context) is literally the application of scientific knowledge mate.
I think you don't understand what we are talking about here.
I wouldn't be so sure
Remember that the same luck is applying to that guy:
LMAO. At least you’re honest and admit you don’t care about policy, you just like it cuz he did something an anime character would do.
And just so you know, the financial protection bureau helps defrauded Americans to get their money back after, you know, being defrauded. But obviously you don’t care about helping common people, or the environment, or access to healthcare. How does it feel to live in la la land?
Post automatically merged:
And just so you know, the financial protection bureau helps defrauded Americans to get their money back after, you know, being defrauded. But obviously you don’t care about helping common people, or the environment, or access to healthcare. How does it feel to live in la la land?
I don't live in La La land. I love in money land. I got fat bankrolls because my taxes are low and I only need to pay my minimum wage workers 7.50. Cry more LIB.
On a serious note though, the shadow of globalization is the biggest threat to the middle class and dwarfs political consideration. I think you could have dems in office for 12 years and it would still be utterly destroyed in that time, they're not really doing what's really needed to undo the damage and turn back the tide.
Commies aren't even good empiricists though. Like even if you have a completely godless rational worldview planned economies are abject logical failures in understanding entropy. They're psueds.
On a serious note though, the shadow of globalization is the biggest threat to the middle class and dwarfs political consideration. I think you could have dems in office for 12 years and it would still be utterly destroyed in that time, they're not really doing what's really needed to undo the damage and turn back the tide.
Post automatically merged:
Commies aren't even good empiricists though. Like even if you have a completely godless rational worldview planned economies are abject logical failures in understanding entropy. They're psueds.
About the universe and everything in it and beyond. Simple
The scientific knowledge are a type of knowledge. Science is a methodology and a practice.
Same thing, in logical knowledge. Logic is the methodology, not the result. Einstein.
Nop. Calculation is a method of organization of data.
Reason is a philosophical concept. Not the same thing.
Same thing
That's right and a practice * for science.
No. Science is not about declaring something true or false. Science has nothing to do with the concept of truth.
Science does not seek to learn the truth, it seeks to understand reality to the maximum.
Same thing, science does not seek the notion of existence or innexistence, but search what the understanding of reality and beyond.
You got a little bit lost in your philosophical papers I think
Materialism has nothing to do with abstraction. You are lost mate. Time to stop smocking your philosophical exam sheets and come back to earth.
The scientific knowledge are a type of knowledge. Science is a methodology and a practice.
Same thing, in logical knowledge. Logic is the methodology, not the result. Einstein.
Nop. Calculation is a method of organization of data.
Reason is a philosophical concept. Not the same thing.
Same thing
That's right and a practice * for science.
No. Science is not about declaring something true or false. Science has nothing to do with the concept of truth.
Science does not seek to learn the truth, it seeks to understand reality to the maximum.
Same thing, science does not seek the notion of existence or innexistence, but search what the understanding of reality and beyond.
You got a little bit lost in your philosophical papers I think
Materialism has nothing to do with abstraction. You are lost mate. Time to stop smocking your philosophical exam sheets and come back to earth.