This ?
I replied already.
Your transphobic rethoric here does not have the same value as mine. Hence why I'm telling you to stop telling BS while explaining stuff you should understand.
You are imagining that my words about the subject are as valuable as yours. Its not the case.
So there is no hypocrisy here. I'm very clear with you.
I replied already.
Your transphobic rethoric here does not have the same value as mine. Hence why I'm telling you to stop telling BS while explaining stuff you should understand.
You are imagining that my words about the subject are as valuable as yours. Its not the case.
So there is no hypocrisy here. I'm very clear with you.
My statement: you despite being ignored of disagreement have continue to press your ideology on me.
You're being called hypocrite on the premise that you're telling me I am pushing my ideologies (transphobic or toxic doesn't matter) on to other people, while you're replying to my convos with other people after I ignored you due to disagreement that was not going to be solved, where you aggressively attack me. Not only have I not pushed anything on to other people, hell I don't even do that in anime debates, rather simply shared my viewpoint and then kept it moving once I saw there would no point in continuing further. You not only attacked me with hate speech, you then defamed me by claiming I'm pushing my ideology on to other people.... when there's only one person who I'd be able to push ideology on in this chat, which is you... and yet I haven't even done that. You will now try to counter this by manipulating the English language into your weird French mindset, instead of acknowledging your fuck up.
The value of your subject or my subject have 0 relevance here to the principle of pushing one's ideals on another.
As far as BS goes, not only have you continuously shown a very poor understanding of the English language in using basic terms like prejudice, racism, transphobia, and just recently a complete lack of understanding how the terms man and woman have been used. You then ramble continuously to people about things that aren't directly related to the point that's being addressed by spamming articles due to getting emotional. When myself & @Uncle Van attempted to explain to you the usage of prejudice, you tried to counter by posting the definition from dictionary.com, you then highlighted the specific listed definitions that you were implying you were going by... and despite that YOU STILL MISUSED IT AGAINST ME....rather than calling you a moron, a complete idiot, or such things. I ignored your post and kept it moving, figuring there's no point in continuing a discussion where you as a non-English speaker clearly don't have an understanding of terminology. Which we went through again today with man-woman...to which I proceeded to ignore you again.
Did it end there? Oh no, now you just displayed that you don't understand what the term identity means, where you attempt to counter the idea that identity is not just who the individual is socially but also biologically. By doing what? trying to change the definition of identity that'd fit your agenda. Which seems to be a common theme here in your posts and those who run your agenda, then you revert back to "ohh but-t-t-t-t in french alallala".
Hell you didn't even understand that accepting the ideology/lifestyle of Islam is believing in Islam's ideologies. Because you don't understand English terminology, which isn't an issue by any means. Then you continuously misuse the word "rights".
-----------------
You then continue to display that you like imagining arguments to argue against, which multiple people have called you out on. When people tell you they aren't transphobic and they're fine with Trans people having the same rights as them, you continuously push a label that doesn't fit them... because you personally want to push an agenda.
Majority if not all the people here understand everything related to trans folks, what most are arguing against is the terminology, which you're trying to force them to agree to. Yes people don't want to call those who aren't biological females, women... that is a matter of defining what the term refers to. You bringing science into it and spamming links to articles, is by no means helping your points... hence they're constantly ignored. Why? Because the same terminology disagreement would exist between us and the individuals writing those articles. Just as bringing up race dysmorphia in order to to support people should start labeling each other by the race they choose to identify with rather than their biology isn't going to be met with open arms... I reckon Transracial will be your next ideology to defend, and all the props to you if it is best of lucky.
Being Trans is not accepted in Islam (despite many people attempting to now change it to appease folks like yourself). You by trying to force those people to accepting being Trans, are infringing on their right to practice their religion and faith. Which would make you Islamophobic by the logic you go around throwing "transphobic" with. That doesn't mean Transpeople and Muslims cannot co-exist. But you'd probably want the billion+ Muslims to change their linguistics to accommodate the less than 1% transfolks, knowing how irrational it is.
People with different ideologies can co-exist and will continue to do so. I and others will continue to live alongside trans people respecting their human and government rights, while continuing to use the language how we've always used among ourselves in public and private.
Anyhow this is my final post on the thread, yourself and others can freely reply to it.










I thought only left wingers make violent protests