Yeah, and I replied. I forgot to add the terms "transphobic/toxic ideas" talking about your ideals. :)
Yes it does.
Sharing a transphobic viewpoint is pushing transphobia on potential trans people who could come here.
A viewpoint is not just a viewpoint. When shared, it can be something hurtfull.
Nop. Simply replying to you
I don't need to manipulate language in order to make my points.
This sentence doesn't make sence.
Hm.. nop.
I think its you who don't understand those terms. I have a very precise and political knowledge of those terms mate
You not understanding the link between an article about transidentity and transphobic rethoric might be a problem that has more to do with you rather than me
Badly *
Yes, just like what you are constantly doing.
The usage of this word is quite clear.
Nop. You simply didn't accept the definition. Prejudice can be used IN USAGE (linguistic term mate, check it up that might help you) not only has an opinion but also to an action. Now, weither you accept this usage or not does not really matter.
Again, learn about linguistic and usages mate.
This is not something you will learn in dictionnaries.
And yes, if you are spreading BS, no matter if you talk to me or not, I will come and counter your argumentation. That's how I work.
Ignore me all you want mate. I'm not doing that for you.
Do you not think that it is
YOU who is actually CHANGING the definition of identity to fit YOUR reactionnary agenda ?
Trans are clear on the question : Their gender (social construct) is part of their identity.
WHO THE F. ARE YOU TO QUESTION THAT ?
No, the problem is you and your reactionnary friend who DON'T UNDERSTAND the scientificity and REALITIES of some concepts in the first place and try to change them to fit YOUR agenda
We, leftist, follow reality. We believe in science and in linguistic.
We do not fix the language or try to fix it in place because we KNOW that the language evolve, so we usually avoid using dictionnaries and stick to actual scientific description instead.
But you guys are moved by your idealism and you preconception of reality. And since science can't help you with that, you stick to dictionnaries who are mainly outdated and try to change the meaning of words in order to twist reality on your side.
Spoiler : Reality is not on your side.
Because its not.
It doesn't take Einstein to understand the difference in accepting the beliefs of others and their lifestyle (tolerance) the the act of believing in something (belief)
And yet.. it seems like you can't even understand that simple difference.
I will not shame you. Its just... very dissapointing.
?
This is new.
-----------------
So basically all of this was to tell me that you were mad because I don't use dictionnaries and when I do, the definition don't go your way or that I do not respect your point of view ?
If you really think that by attacking my english usage, you will find a way to create a pertinent critic about me... I think you are delulu.
----------------
Because a lot of reactionnary here are trying to tell me that I'm wrong doesn't mean that I am. Again the nuance comes with the term "reactionnaries" ;) (and also confused liberals in some case)
You can be fine with Trans having the same right as you and STILL be transphobic mate.
Its not mutually exclusive.
I RARELY call someone a transphobe.
Instead I'm always VERY CAREFUL to always say "stop using transphobic rethoric".
Which is not the same thing.
But nuance and actual observation doesn't seems to be your strong suits.. like a lot of your pals here.
And no. I won't stop when I see actual transphobic rethoric. I've been fighting transphobia for years. I have discussed and learned about it around trans and activists on the subject.. people who KNOW what they are talking about when it comes to transphobia.
You don't seems to be in the best place to teach me what is transphobia or what is not. So... back Off.
No. The majority do not.
If people were really informed on the subject here, they would not spread transphobic rethoric.
Arguing on the terminology is ALREADY showing a problem of understanding of the issue that is transphobia.
And no, some people here are not simply arguing against the terminology, but against trans people themselves.
You are new here, so you can't really understand the extent of transphobia on this thread, but to explain it to you shortly:
I've been fighting against transphobia here since the beginning of this thread. Quite literally and I know that people here are not simply arguing on terminology.
Which is LITERALLY what TRANSPHOBIA IS.
No, its a matter of NOT being a transphobic and reactionnary confused a**hole.
If calling someone a woman (because they identify as such) is a problem for you, the problem is not the language, the problem is
you.
Again, I'm not only doing it for you guys, but for other people who might come as well.
And yes, it does help my point. The problem is that you don't understand... the point.
Yes.. thus proving that your point of view is purely ideological and not at all related to any kind of reality.
Hence why its problematic in this context.
Ow... this is usually something used by people to delegitimize transgenderism.
Again.. another example of people here being completely ignorant on what we are talking about.
Gender disphoria is an actual pathology. Transidentity is therefore something real that comes with REAL LIFE OPPRESSIONS.. Transracialism is not and based on racist stereotypes and a missunderstanding of social constructs.
If accepting human being is problematic to you because of your faith, then there is a problem.
I know a few muslim that perfectly accept trans people.
Being a good person by accepting trans people and being a believer are two things that are not mutually exclusives.
Thing is..
I've seen absolutely Z.E.R.O muslims here being transphobic because of their faith.
And if they were, I would simply attack their argumentation and not their faith or beliefs. Which would not be islamophobic.
Yeah, in absolute, I would like that, but those who are actually fighting trans people are not the muslim but reactionnary conservative who are not muslim at all. So those who I need to fight in priority are those reactionnary people.
Indeed. There are a LOT of ideologies in leftism.
But some ideologies are not compatible with others.
If you can't accept people based on their identity, then you don't have a place in the discussion.
In conclusion.. nothing much really to take from this thread.
Just like others.. this is mostly a rant because you don't understand the subject at all and don't understand why calling a woman a woman and not a man in the context of trans people is important.
I hope you will find a way to understand it.
perfect
