Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You do understand that it's not because Trump says that he is not a warmonger that he is not, right ?
A little reminder that the first plague of the year of doom was Trump almost starting an all out war with Iran.
Progressive doesn't mean good. It means aimed toward progress. She is a liberal but a progressive one (when Macron is a conservative liberal). She is just much more preferable than Trump, it's not even a debate.
A little reminder that the first plague of the year of doom was Trump almost starting an all out war with Iran.
Progressive doesn't mean good. It means aimed toward progress. She is a liberal but a progressive one (when Macron is a conservative liberal). She is just much more preferable than Trump, it's not even a debate.
Throwing around buzzwords like "warmonger" has 0 meaning, think about this rationally. The death of Soleimani was one of the few significat acts of warfare of his presidency and it didn't even have much of a consequence. On the other hand, after 5 years of Biden we are on te brink of WWIII. Trump doesn't seem to have much interest in going to war with Russia and China, at least for now, and probably not in the spawn of his last presidency if he wins. The Democrats want to either go to war or at least pilot Europe into it while they sit in the back. It's basically suicidal for an European to want Kabalah to win.
Btw yeah Trump seems to approve the genocide in the Middle East and while it's very sad, it's a position shared by both candidates and it can't be stopped by this election. Let's be rational and at least try to keep ourselves alive for now, wishing for our own destruction won't bring any benefit.
Btw yeah Trump seems to approve the genocide in the Middle East and while it's very sad, it's a position shared by both candidates and it can't be stopped by this election. Let's be rational and at least try to keep ourselves alive for now, wishing for our own destruction won't bring any benefit.
In this context, I use "conservatism" and "progressism" not as status but political vectors.
In this sence, you can be a progressist and be a Taliban or a communist and a conservatist. What I'm talking about here is the vector of the political leanance.
Harris is a liberal that has the mind turn toward the left where liberals like Macron are the opposite. EVEN if technically, they are both problematic on a social stance.
Of course. But there is a context behind that. A context that was growing during Trump's presidency. In the same context, Trump would be in the same position. Simply because they are both turned toward imperialism.
In this sence, you can be a progressist and be a Taliban or a communist and a conservatist. What I'm talking about here is the vector of the political leanance.
Harris is a liberal that has the mind turn toward the left where liberals like Macron are the opposite. EVEN if technically, they are both problematic on a social stance.
Of course. But there is a context behind that. A context that was growing during Trump's presidency. In the same context, Trump would be in the same position. Simply because they are both turned toward imperialism.
If you wanna fave Kamela you don't need to justify yourself, your problem as I said. But cut the crap and stop wasting my time with this context bullshit, one day you people accuse him of being Putin's girlfriend and the other day he somehow made the "context", whatever it is, that bought us to war and somehow he's more responsible for this than Biden.
VP; senator and future president :)
She is better than Macron in the sence that she is actually trying to do something about minorities (coming from one herself). When Macron is doing nothing, worse, is trying to attack them directly.
Again. you don't understand what I mean by political vector. It means the way the political cursor will tend to go in the case of an evolution.
Harris is most likely to go toward progressism rather than conservatism. I could be wrong of course but in ALL WAYS she is a better fit for the post than Donald Trump and there should not even be one debate about this.
You should KNOW and FULLY understand the importance of NEVER EVER letting a leway or a vote to the far right and the fact that they are in NO WAY comparable.
She is better than Macron in the sence that she is actually trying to do something about minorities (coming from one herself). When Macron is doing nothing, worse, is trying to attack them directly.
Again. you don't understand what I mean by political vector. It means the way the political cursor will tend to go in the case of an evolution.
Harris is most likely to go toward progressism rather than conservatism. I could be wrong of course but in ALL WAYS she is a better fit for the post than Donald Trump and there should not even be one debate about this.
You should KNOW and FULLY understand the importance of NEVER EVER letting a leway or a vote to the far right and the fact that they are in NO WAY comparable.
So you're basically admitting you don't know her policy beliefs and what she actually wants to do as president. I do understand your dumbass "vector" analogy, you simply use it trying to argue that she is a step in the right direction, which I might agree with. But you STILL just say shit based on your gut feeling, not based on facts. Which leads me to believe you don't actually care about policy, you just care about the vibe.
You have a problem of understanding I think. I just told you that it's not about her belief system, it's about the vector of her belief system.
Harris is a liberal. In that sence, she is my political ennemy. So I'm literally against her. What I'm telling you is that her political vector, based on what she says and what she promotes, is aimed toward the left and not toward the right. And i'm telling you that this is the difference between the liberals in the US and in France where Macron, is aiming toward the right (and even the far right).
No. I'm telling you that the is the only solution in front of Trump right now. She is not a step in the right direction, she is the incarnation of the status co. She is simply not something worse.
It's based on what she says, what she promotes and what she did, so yeah. Those are facts. Again. Don't give me moral lessons on the ways I view liberals, you are much closer to her than I am in term of ideology mate.
When you are telling me that you don't care if you want to vote for Trump or Harris it shows to me that you don't understand the stakes.
Because no matter if your vote doesn't change the result, it will influence the polls. And those can have an impact. We should NEVER EVER leave anything to the far right. Even if we want to troll.
Again. Last time. Don't make moral lessons to a radical leftist about liberals when you don't understand this simple fact. I had to vote 3 times for liberals just to prevent the far right to come in power. Don't ever think that I don't know what I'm talking about here when I'm talking about making a difficult vote.
Harris is a liberal. In that sence, she is my political ennemy. So I'm literally against her. What I'm telling you is that her political vector, based on what she says and what she promotes, is aimed toward the left and not toward the right. And i'm telling you that this is the difference between the liberals in the US and in France where Macron, is aiming toward the right (and even the far right).
No. I'm telling you that the is the only solution in front of Trump right now. She is not a step in the right direction, she is the incarnation of the status co. She is simply not something worse.
It's based on what she says, what she promotes and what she did, so yeah. Those are facts. Again. Don't give me moral lessons on the ways I view liberals, you are much closer to her than I am in term of ideology mate.
When you are telling me that you don't care if you want to vote for Trump or Harris it shows to me that you don't understand the stakes.
Because no matter if your vote doesn't change the result, it will influence the polls. And those can have an impact. We should NEVER EVER leave anything to the far right. Even if we want to troll.
Again. Last time. Don't make moral lessons to a radical leftist about liberals when you don't understand this simple fact. I had to vote 3 times for liberals just to prevent the far right to come in power. Don't ever think that I don't know what I'm talking about here when I'm talking about making a difficult vote.