Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
@Blax Blah
By drug empire I mean his actual drug trafficing empire, not the country of Syria itself
By drug empire I mean his actual drug trafficing empire, not the country of Syria itself
The idea ? Bisoromi didn't make that up. Assad's war was fueled by drugs
Man literally drops "there is so much negativity" in the middle of his rant full of contempt
Man literally drops "there is so much negativity" in the middle of his rant full of contempt
Post automatically merged:
You do you mate have fun arguing with c4n
Nah.
The genocide in america is THE genocide mate. If you want more informations about those in Brazil, anthropologist and sociologist have studied the question and have sum that up in this book:
"Abya Yala!: Genocício, resistência e sobrevivência dos povos originários do atual continente americano" - A sociological report by Moema VIezzer and Marcelo Grondin
No really different no. Different places, yes. But not in the methods.
A civilization is not defined by its control of metal.
While there was no "civilizations" in south america (even if you could say that all those community formed a big but conflictual civilization), there were multiple nations defined by common culture, linguistic and territories.
But again, this is not an excuse for colonization and genocide. Those lands belonged to those people or rather, to everyone there and thus, were not free to be colonized.
Which is why I'm talking about collective land and not common property.
This land was stolen by defaut because appriopriated and put under the property of all. It's the basic principle of this colonization.
To give you an image it's like if I said that the football club is a collective territory and thus shared and taken care of by everyone without anyone or everyone owning the place.... and someone comes one day and declares their property on the the football field.
It's thieft in the sense that it privatize a common and collective assets, thus preventing anyone from benefiting equally from it.
Don't blame me because you can't make a google search mate.
I bet you can't google the major part of important scientific studies either.
Yes they did.
https://www.grunge.com/1241172/the-tragic-genocide-of-brazils-indigenous-peoples/
Yes they did.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...azil-c174090/BC2902030B3EF3100059FFCF371384E9
Yes, but not only.
https://slaveryandremembrance.org/articles/article/?id=A0129
I need to use ChatGPT to convince you, not to understand science mate.
And it seems to be working since you were triggered by the fact that this AI cold heartedly demonstrated that I was the one - despite my conflictual approach - giving the most care to factual and scientific evidences.
Something that you never do, worst, a science you deny the legitimacy of.
Nop lol.
I've been talking about this since the beginning of the thread. In fact, the argument that you see me having with Nameless here, has happened at least twice before because he refuses to listen to scientific evidences.
Go check the date on this post please: >>>>
So you are willing to ignore history just because I spoke badly about portugeses colonizers ? Which kind of man are you ?
Do you read One Piece sometimes ?
I never argue with Mathias.
At least not in the last year.
The genocide in america is THE genocide mate. If you want more informations about those in Brazil, anthropologist and sociologist have studied the question and have sum that up in this book:
"Abya Yala!: Genocício, resistência e sobrevivência dos povos originários do atual continente americano" - A sociological report by Moema VIezzer and Marcelo Grondin
No really different no. Different places, yes. But not in the methods.
A civilization is not defined by its control of metal.
While there was no "civilizations" in south america (even if you could say that all those community formed a big but conflictual civilization), there were multiple nations defined by common culture, linguistic and territories.
But again, this is not an excuse for colonization and genocide. Those lands belonged to those people or rather, to everyone there and thus, were not free to be colonized.
Which is why I'm talking about collective land and not common property.
This land was stolen by defaut because appriopriated and put under the property of all. It's the basic principle of this colonization.
To give you an image it's like if I said that the football club is a collective territory and thus shared and taken care of by everyone without anyone or everyone owning the place.... and someone comes one day and declares their property on the the football field.
It's thieft in the sense that it privatize a common and collective assets, thus preventing anyone from benefiting equally from it.
Don't blame me because you can't make a google search mate.
I bet you can't google the major part of important scientific studies either.
Yes they did.
https://www.grunge.com/1241172/the-tragic-genocide-of-brazils-indigenous-peoples/
Yes they did.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...azil-c174090/BC2902030B3EF3100059FFCF371384E9
Yes, but not only.
https://slaveryandremembrance.org/articles/article/?id=A0129
I need to use ChatGPT to convince you, not to understand science mate.
And it seems to be working since you were triggered by the fact that this AI cold heartedly demonstrated that I was the one - despite my conflictual approach - giving the most care to factual and scientific evidences.
Something that you never do, worst, a science you deny the legitimacy of.
Nop lol.
I've been talking about this since the beginning of the thread. In fact, the argument that you see me having with Nameless here, has happened at least twice before because he refuses to listen to scientific evidences.
Go check the date on this post please: >>>>
So you are willing to ignore history just because I spoke badly about portugeses colonizers ? Which kind of man are you ?
Do you read One Piece sometimes ?
You do you mate have fun arguing with c4n
At least not in the last year.
We have different concepts of what a negative person is
I didn’t drop ”there’s too much negativity” anyway, negativity is fluctuating and is part of life. It becomes worrying when the same patterns of horseshit are repeated by a person, thus becoming part of his identity
Everyone who argued with C4N can see this pattern, which is why I said what I said
I didn’t drop ”there’s too much negativity” anyway, negativity is fluctuating and is part of life. It becomes worrying when the same patterns of horseshit are repeated by a person, thus becoming part of his identity
Everyone who argued with C4N can see this pattern, which is why I said what I said
