Kizaruber Eats

The Red Haired Rat Will Die.
Yep. Here's some more simplified shit before my brain betrays me again.

Left = the system itself is working exactly as intended in causing problems and needs to be replaced

Center= the system is broken and a few tweaks can fix it

Right = the system is fine. Certain people within the system is what's causing the issue.
-------
Leftist believe that at least majority of the problems in society is material. Bad things happen when a person's basic material needs aren't meet. The prioritize equality of outcome.

Right wingers believe that a person's hard work and morality determines their place in society, and those with bad material conditions and commits crime are because of their lack of merit and moral failures. The prioritize equality of opportunity instead of outcome.

Centrist are against radical changes on either side and dont want to change the ecomonic system. They prefer to uphold to status quo and have a vested interest in thing remaining the same. They acknowledge the problems facing marginalized groups but refuse any economic reforms and instead, tried to uplift via more representation. They are hated by the left and right for good reason lol
Oooh nice, this is the most concise and thus understandable explanation I've seen for all the main political sides or whatever lol.

When you break it down with how each side views the system and thus approaches it, that explains so much in so little damn.

Centrists wanting to protect the status quo is something I've seen come up many times and it really does show when you hear takes from certain major e-celebs and how they fence sit and don't take sides. (Well not so directly and publicly anyway usually.)

It makes so much sense the right focus on a person centered perspective or whatever, which in turn should lean towards more personal accountability and thus individual responsibility. Or something like that lol. they fact they focus specifically on merit and morality is so true too, which I can understand but there's a lot of hypocrisy om their parts there ofc.

Leftists focusing on attacking the system and destroying and or replacing it makes sense too. the whole anarchy and rebellion, revolutions and "Punk culture".
Kinda makes me think of that British Punk Spiderman vs the order and control obsessed, the morality focuses Miguel O'Hara Spiderman in the 2nd Spiderverse film, heh.

Thanks for the summary man, that was a great read and something to dwell on, to think about. a lot of things make a lot more sense now. I had a rough idea anyway but this really clarified it for me.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Oooh nice, this is the most concise and thus understandable explanation I've seen for all the main political sides or whatever lol.

When you break it down with how each side views the system and thus approaches it, that explains so much in so little damn.

Centrists wanting to protect the status quo is something I've seen come up many times and it really does show when you hear takes from certain major e-celebs and how they fence sit and don't take sides. (Well not so directly and publicly anyway usually.)

It makes so much sense the right focus on a person centered perspective or whatever, which in turn should lean towards more personal accountability and thus individual responsibility. Or something like that lol. they fact they focus specifically on merit and morality is so true too, which I can understand but there's a lot of hypocrisy om their parts there ofc.

Leftists focusing on attacking the system and destroying and or replacing it makes sense too. the whole anarchy and rebellion, revolutions and "Punk culture".
Kinda makes me think of that British Punk Spiderman vs the order and control obsessed, the morality focuses Miguel O'Hara Spiderman in the 2nd Spiderverse film, heh.

Thanks for the summary man, that was a great read and something to dwell on, to think about. a lot of things make a lot more sense now. I had a rough idea anyway but this really clarified it for me.
Glad its makings easier to grasp for you. Everyone tossing terms back n' forth that are inaccurate by definiton, combined with the many ideologies within each political side can make things confusing as fuck lol.

This is what a quick explanation on some of the core values of the 3 key sides. Lemme know if you ever want to know some of stuff in more detail(in a very simplified way of course lol).
 
Indeed. On the left, we believe that we are the product and a part of our universe, a piece of the puzzle. This means that we believe that to change ourselves, we must change the universe or at the very least, the systems (economic or social) that shape us.



But the more we go right the more people believe in the power of the mind to shape this universe. The mind can therefore create on its own the condition for success or failure. This is why people on the right will try to change the individuals instead of changing the universe.



This relationship of agency of the individual on its reality can be traced in pretty much all types of politics and political debate. A random ex: People on the right will believe in individual punishments to stop crime, but the left will say "crime is a result of bad systems".

So both vision can only clash in the creation of opposite politics. Which can only create conflicts.
 
Last edited:
@Logiko so france is trying to assassinate clowndace owens?

:choppawhat:
I don't know but it's funny how she thinks that the gov has a lot of time to spare. She is really not that important or even really threatenning at all for them. Especially when she focuses on transphobia when in reality she should focus on grooming lmao
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
What a coincidence. A few months ago, politicians were fear mongering about middle Eastern terrorists infiltrating the nation to justify military on the streets. Trump's military orders were deemed unconstitutional and almost immediately after, we get a terrorist attack.

Crazy how many coincidences(and convenient outcomes) there are whenever something bad happens.
 
Top