Controversial General Political Discussion

Logiko

Logiko

‎
#77,341
#77,341
Jiihad said:
@Logiko wtf, why are your responses so fuxkin long? Who’s actually reading that shit mane
Click to expand...
Claude and chatGPT it seems lmao.

The problem is that I can't explain complex subject without complex explanations. If I say "racialization is a form of class hierarchization based on perceived raced within the sociological structures of white supremacy whiteness", everybody will stay "nope, u stupid racism is people hating based on race" and move on.

People don't make research here outside of claude or chatgpt and when they do (cf Van just above who explained to me a case of the racialization of irish without seeing that he was actually validating my demonstration.) they missunderstand it or ignore the core subject.

So I'm stuck between big explanations and small sentences where I say "you didn't understand". On top of that, I'm kind of obsessive about things I'm passionate about so I make big texts.



Uncle Van said:
white supremacy is domination but not all domination is white supremacy.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Patriarchy is the domination of men over women for example.

Glad we are finally moving.
 
Uncle Van

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
‎
#77,342
#77,342
Logiko said:
Claude and chatGPT it seems lmao.

The problem is that I can't explain complex subject without complex explanations. If I say "racialization is a form of class hierarchization based on perceived raced within the sociological structures of white supremacy whiteness", everybody will stay "nope, u stupid racism is people hating based on race" and move on.

People don't make research here outside of claude or chatgpt and when they do (cf Van just above who explained to me a case of the racialization of irish without seeing that he was actually validating my demonstration.) they missunderstand it or ignore the core subject.

So I'm stuck between big explanations and small sentences where I say "you didn't understand". On top of that, I'm kind of obsessive about things I'm passionate about so I make big texts.




Exactly. Patriarchy is the domination of men over women for example.

Glad we are finally moving.
Click to expand...
And not all racism is white supremacy. It was right there...
 
Etzel Andergast

Etzel Andergast

‎
#77,345
#77,345
Logiko said:
Claude and chatGPT it seems lmao.

The problem is that I can't explain complex subject without complex explanations. If I say "racialization is a form of class hierarchization based on perceived raced within the sociological structures of white supremacy whiteness", everybody will stay "nope, u stupid racism is people hating based on race" and move on.

People don't make research here outside of claude or chatgpt and when they do (cf Van just above who explained to me a case of the racialization of irish without seeing that he was actually validating my demonstration.) they missunderstand it or ignore the core subject.

So I'm stuck between big explanations and small sentences where I say "you didn't understand". On top of that, I'm kind of obsessive about things I'm passionate about so I make big texts.




Exactly. Patriarchy is the domination of men over women for example.

Glad we are finally moving.
Click to expand...
I read all your replies to me
 
Logiko

Logiko

‎
#77,346
#77,346
Ok I'm i overdrive. I try to reply to everyone for 5 hour straight, I'm completely exhausted, I didn't eat, I didn't relax. Give me some time. And please go do some research in the meantime.

It's not hard, just go for "whiteness studies", "racialism", "systemic racism", stuff like decolonial studies, "power colonity", "knowledge coloniality".. etc.
 
Okamakama

Okamakama

‎
#77,351
#77,351
Logiko said:
The rest is useless, you do not master the subject and you wouldn't understand (yes, again)
Click to expand...
This sort of behaviour deserves a thread ban tbh. You didn't break any rules, but It's so intellectually dishonest that it ruins the entire chat. Any time someone makes a point, you just say they don't understand.

Well, you know what? It's impossible to understand something that is fundamentally illogical and false unless you are ideologically captured or mentally deficient. If nobody understands you then:

A) You are not explaining yourself correctly.
B) Your point makes no logical sense.

I'm going to say what every single person here probably thinks, and I'm sorry - but you come across as an actual narcissist.
 
Logiko

Logiko

‎
#77,352
#77,352
Okamakama said:
You debunked shit. Everyone here can see you were so thoroughly cooked that you just dipped. He responded to you - and you cannot refute it.
Click to expand...
Everyone who has spoken in the last 3 pages never evolved from their vision of racism they learned in 3rd grade. So excuse me if I'm starting to feel a little bit irritated but I'm hungry and I'm starting to get annoy to do 300 paragraph of explanation to people who say "nope u stupid" and don't do some frteaking damn research outside of a bot who can barely code.

I've been replying to all of you for 5 hours straight if not more. I think I can rest a little and send you toward people who know better :

Scientist.

Now, go read them, look at their content, analyze them, eat them for all I care. I'm tired and frankly angry by the incpacity of people to simply self-question their own biases.

I'm starting to believe that me suddenly asking myself - when I was starting to get fascistic view - if I was wrong or not, was a freaking genius move taht is impossible to achieve for the rest of the population.

I know I was told that I was freaking smart but god damn I'm dissapointed right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top