I was always a stupid band aid solution to racial inequality.
Harvard and those colleges were actually being racist. The term “Asian” covers a variety of different ethnicities from various countries. Upper caste Indians are over represented in these universities, however dalits aren’t. Yet by their standards, they’d both be classified as “Asian” and similarly discriminated against.
Post automatically merged:
Idk why the left is so hell bent on preserving affirmative action when there are much better alternatives, ex. Actual slavery reparations.
That way you’re actually going to be benefiting descendants of slavery, whereas often times wealthy African immigrants end up benefiting from AA.
I was always a stupid band aid solution to racial inequality.
Harvard and those colleges were actually being racist. The term “Asian” covers a variety of different ethnicities from various countries. Upper caste Indians are over represented in these universities, however dalits aren’t. Yet by their standards, they’d both be classified as “Asian” and similarly discriminated against.
Post automatically merged:
Idk why the left is so hell bent on preserving affirmative action when there are much better alternatives, ex. Actual slavery reparations.
That way you’re actually going to be benefiting descendants of slavery, whereas often times wealthy African immigrants end up benefiting from AA.
I was always a stupid band aid solution to racial inequality.
Harvard and those colleges were actually being racist. The term “Asian” covers a variety of different ethnicities from various countries. Upper caste Indians are over represented in these universities, however dalits aren’t. Yet by their standards, they’d both be classified as “Asian” and similarly discriminated against.
Post automatically merged:
Idk why the left is so hell bent on preserving affirmative action when there are much better alternatives, ex. Actual slavery reparations.
That way you’re actually going to be benefiting descendants of slavery, whereas often times wealthy African immigrants end up benefiting from AA.
Giving benefits to certain segments of the population isn’t discriminatory. Otherwise you could say Medicare is discriminatory because young people can’t usually get it.
Post automatically merged:
The government should help all people, but different people require different forms of help.
College graduates need student loan forgiveness. Black people need restitution for the oppression their community suffered. Poor white people need more development in rural areas.
A big reason why nothing ever gets done is that people are so opposed to helping anybody other than themselves. Not every form of government action needs to benefit everybody.
If the world was made of pudding you damn well know I would've taken a bite out of the Lincoln Memorial so might as well lock me up for destruction of public property right now
If the world was made of pudding you damn well know I would've taken a bite out of the Lincoln Memorial so might as well lock me up for destruction of public property right now
What he's saying is that tearing down statues of supposed oppressors in an act of indignant self-indulgence is the height of hypocrisy. It's childish and destructive. It accomplishes nothing.
Post automatically merged:
The concept of reparations is the appropriation of wealth from the wrong people for the wrong people. People just want free stuff. This is not about justice, it is about greed. Taking money from a white guy who never committed a crime will not appease or achieve justice for your ancestor. It does not change history. It does not undo a sin, even more so because that sin does not belong to the descendent.
You just want a good excuse for moral supremacy through a hierarchical structure based entirely on supposed oppression.
What he's saying is that tearing down statues of supposed oppressors in an act of indignant self-indulgence is the height of hypocrisy. It's childish and destructive. It accomplishes nothing.
I have apologised. And accepted that I should not have gone so far. I stand by some of my views, but I went about things the wrong way. If you're going to continue to hold onto it, that is your prerogative.
It does not change the fact that you have essentially refused to properly refute my point about the issue that is currently being discussed...
I have apologised. And accepted that I should not have gone so far. I stand by some of my views, but I went about things the wrong way. If you're going to continue to hold onto it, that is your prerogative.
It does not change the fact that you have essentially refused to properly refute my point about the issue that is currently being discussed...
You can apologize all you wish. I do not forgive you and will continue to view you negatively based on your words and actions.
Its hard to refute your point because it is baseless and inflammatory. What is there to say to "your oppression isn't real you just want free money" besides "I disagree."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.