>>>>

The defense of Trump and bolsonaro are some of the redflags.

The ultra liberal/libertarian/capitalist/with no responsibilities vision is quite the sight

The anti science rethoric doesn't help.

The antifeminist takes are one of the problem too.

The common far right perception about woke and the upcoming of the leftist freedom taker is also red flag.

The progun discourse is showing the ideas too.

The non subtle transphobic rethoric is drawing the concept.

The sharing of cryptofascist rethoric is quite the commong factor

And the usual far right complotist BS is the cherry on top of the bigot cake


All of those points combined are showing me a far right propagandist.




I've been studying for decades. I know the importance of the creative library. I'm just choosing to fill that less with the old sacred and sometimes quite problematic stories or very bad myth and more with sometimes old but more so fresh stories closer to what I want to talk about, and relevant unspoken life event and situations.

Don't worry, I got this covered.
lmfao,you actually went way back to dig quotes...did you get a full night's sleep?
[automerge]1703433331[/automerge]
jesus is a fictional character
He was a historical figure.Google the Sudarium of Oviedo.
 
hegemonic meaning ruling or dominant in a political or social context.

and how exactly does anything im to say really support



it's not like my politics are supported by the status quo like yours



cite me one example of biden,cnn or somebody in power supporting my positions




i can name like a dozen of cases of liberals despite supposedly being so different to you nearly agreeing on everything




And still, during all the campagn, women are delegitimized because of their gender by the opposite and hegemonic side,


it was more randoms on the web that wanted hilary


aside from fox news



the right does not exist outside of the internet



all the mainstream shit leans left hence them wanting her to win


and throwing a huge temper tantrum when she lost
[automerge]1703501076[/automerge]
He was a historical figure.Google the Sudarium of Oviedo.

yea it's supposed to be jesus's bloodstained cloth but there's no dna evidence confirming it was him


could of been a random for all we know


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo



and tbh, the carbon dating was mentioned at being inaccurate due to a oil contamination so we dont even know if it dates correctly
[automerge]1703501478[/automerge]
No, again, the system is liberal. Meaning that the system is only sucking feminist idea in order to appeal to the leftist that are against their politics, in reality, the system is pro capitalist and feminism is just a way to appear less violent.

so when biden privately requested twitter to erase right wing figures

he was just pretending to be left wing as goes every single person and company in power right now


just seems like cope when was it said that it was just a act???




plus if they wanted to appeal to anyone wouldt they appeal to right wingers



it's not exactly like pushing transgenderism is that popular among average joes




target and budlight nearly went out of business for doing so
[automerge]1703501515[/automerge]
No, again, the system is liberal. Meaning that the system is only sucking feminist idea in order to appeal to the leftist that are against their politics, in reality, the system is pro capitalist and feminism is just a way to appear less violent.

so when biden privately requested twitter to erase right wing figures

he was just pretending to be left wing as goes every single person and company in power right now


just seems like cope when was it said that it was just a act???




plus if they wanted to appeal to anyone wouldt they appeal to right wingers



it's not exactly like pushing transgenderism is that popular among average joes




target and budlight nearly went out of business for doing so
[automerge]1703502585[/automerge]
and situation where people are creating less shelters for men, expecting them to be stronger.

carrot everytime a man's shelter was shut down


it was not because of tradcons but rather femminsts



Here's an article that touches on the issues.

http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a41532d6-d4df-46a2-a784-f6499938f3b0

It might be more that some feminists have relentlessly promoted the narrative that men attack women and never the reverse. This has meant that government funds are not available to men's shelters, private donations for men's shelters are negligible, existing shelters that would consider having some space for men have not opened up that space for me



ut everything we talk about in leftism are based on factual evidences.

im going to explain this from two angles carrot


for one, this means as literally everybody thinks they are factually correct


i bet tejas and nameless would quote themselves as being correct too


so why should one take your declaration of factual correctness over say anybody else's


what would make my declaration wrong?


you gotta examine things and you see carrot, that's why your sources are flawed


they cite no polling data or anything they just go on long unhinged femminist rants at least the one im to have skimmed over did that


making grand claims of this or that without any facts backing it


listen if this was any other field say biological study or study of space, you will get laughed out of the room for not providing your sources


plus these fields cant be debunked by merely pointing out some contradicting information that anyone can find


if it's true then the law of non contradiction shows it must not have a contradiction
 
Last edited:
but there's no dna evidence confirming it was him
How would you even do that. You dont have anything to compare it to
[automerge]1703503136[/automerge]
yea it's supposed to be jesus's bloodstained cloth but there's no dna evidence confirming it was him


could of been a random for all we know


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo



and tbh, the carbon dating was mentioned at being inaccurate due to a oil contamination so we dont even know if it dates correctly
Oh and also not like this is the only shroud supposedly being from jesus.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin
 
How would you even do that. You dont have anything to compare it to

compare it to what you would expect an average jew would be like x mount of years ago


populations were all very isolated back then so pretty much everyone was the same race


besides if you can get mammoth dna figured out
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/17/world/mammoth-oldest-dna-million-years-ago-scn/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/31/woolly-mammoth-dna-cloning


im sure you can figure out jesus dna



In 1988, radiocarbon dating by three different laboratories established that the shroud's linen material was produced between the years 1260 and 1390


your own source disagrees it was jesus's


unless your saying jesus died at 1260
 
In 1988, radiocarbon dating by three different laboratories established that the shroud's linen material was produced between the years 1260 and 1390


your own source disagrees it was jesus's


unless your saying jesus died at 1260
I didnt argue it was legit. Just said there is another "supposedly" belonging to jesus.

Not sure of there are any other artifacts though.

Evidence for jesus isnt all that great in general.
 
Top