Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
hegemonic meaning ruling or dominant in a political or social context.
and how exactly does anything im to say really support
it's not like my politics are supported by the status quo like yours
cite me one example of biden,cnn or somebody in power supporting my positions
i can name like a dozen of cases of liberals despite supposedly being so different to you nearly agreeing on everything
it was more randoms on the web that wanted hilary
aside from fox news
the right does not exist outside of the internet
all the mainstream shit leans left hence them wanting her to win
and throwing a huge temper tantrum when she lost
yea it's supposed to be jesus's bloodstained cloth but there's no dna evidence confirming it was him
could of been a random for all we know
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo
and tbh, the carbon dating was mentioned at being inaccurate due to a oil contamination so we dont even know if it dates correctly
so when biden privately requested twitter to erase right wing figures
he was just pretending to be left wing as goes every single person and company in power right now
just seems like cope when was it said that it was just a act???
plus if they wanted to appeal to anyone wouldt they appeal to right wingers
it's not exactly like pushing transgenderism is that popular among average joes
target and budlight nearly went out of business for doing so
so when biden privately requested twitter to erase right wing figures
he was just pretending to be left wing as goes every single person and company in power right now
just seems like cope when was it said that it was just a act???
plus if they wanted to appeal to anyone wouldt they appeal to right wingers
it's not exactly like pushing transgenderism is that popular among average joes
target and budlight nearly went out of business for doing so
carrot everytime a man's shelter was shut down
it was not because of tradcons but rather femminsts
Here's an article that touches on the issues.
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a41532d6-d4df-46a2-a784-f6499938f3b0
It might be more that some feminists have relentlessly promoted the narrative that men attack women and never the reverse. This has meant that government funds are not available to men's shelters, private donations for men's shelters are negligible, existing shelters that would consider having some space for men have not opened up that space for me
im going to explain this from two angles carrot
for one, this means as literally everybody thinks they are factually correct
i bet tejas and nameless would quote themselves as being correct too
so why should one take your declaration of factual correctness over say anybody else's
what would make my declaration wrong?
you gotta examine things and you see carrot, that's why your sources are flawed
they cite no polling data or anything they just go on long unhinged femminist rants at least the one im to have skimmed over did that
making grand claims of this or that without any facts backing it
listen if this was any other field say biological study or study of space, you will get laughed out of the room for not providing your sources
plus these fields cant be debunked by merely pointing out some contradicting information that anyone can find
if it's true then the law of non contradiction shows it must not have a contradiction
and how exactly does anything im to say really support
it's not like my politics are supported by the status quo like yours
cite me one example of biden,cnn or somebody in power supporting my positions
i can name like a dozen of cases of liberals despite supposedly being so different to you nearly agreeing on everything
it was more randoms on the web that wanted hilary
aside from fox news
the right does not exist outside of the internet
all the mainstream shit leans left hence them wanting her to win
and throwing a huge temper tantrum when she lost
Post automatically merged:
yea it's supposed to be jesus's bloodstained cloth but there's no dna evidence confirming it was him
could of been a random for all we know
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo
and tbh, the carbon dating was mentioned at being inaccurate due to a oil contamination so we dont even know if it dates correctly
Post automatically merged:
so when biden privately requested twitter to erase right wing figures
he was just pretending to be left wing as goes every single person and company in power right now
just seems like cope when was it said that it was just a act???
plus if they wanted to appeal to anyone wouldt they appeal to right wingers
it's not exactly like pushing transgenderism is that popular among average joes
target and budlight nearly went out of business for doing so
Post automatically merged:
so when biden privately requested twitter to erase right wing figures
he was just pretending to be left wing as goes every single person and company in power right now
just seems like cope when was it said that it was just a act???
plus if they wanted to appeal to anyone wouldt they appeal to right wingers
it's not exactly like pushing transgenderism is that popular among average joes
target and budlight nearly went out of business for doing so
Post automatically merged:
carrot everytime a man's shelter was shut down
it was not because of tradcons but rather femminsts
Here's an article that touches on the issues.
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a41532d6-d4df-46a2-a784-f6499938f3b0
It might be more that some feminists have relentlessly promoted the narrative that men attack women and never the reverse. This has meant that government funds are not available to men's shelters, private donations for men's shelters are negligible, existing shelters that would consider having some space for men have not opened up that space for me
im going to explain this from two angles carrot
for one, this means as literally everybody thinks they are factually correct
i bet tejas and nameless would quote themselves as being correct too
so why should one take your declaration of factual correctness over say anybody else's
what would make my declaration wrong?
you gotta examine things and you see carrot, that's why your sources are flawed
they cite no polling data or anything they just go on long unhinged femminist rants at least the one im to have skimmed over did that
making grand claims of this or that without any facts backing it
listen if this was any other field say biological study or study of space, you will get laughed out of the room for not providing your sources
plus these fields cant be debunked by merely pointing out some contradicting information that anyone can find
if it's true then the law of non contradiction shows it must not have a contradiction
Last edited:
How would you even do that. You dont have anything to compare it to
Oh and also not like this is the only shroud supposedly being from jesus.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin
Post automatically merged:
Oh and also not like this is the only shroud supposedly being from jesus.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin
compare it to what you would expect an average jew would be like x mount of years ago
populations were all very isolated back then so pretty much everyone was the same race
besides if you can get mammoth dna figured out
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/17/world/mammoth-oldest-dna-million-years-ago-scn/index.html
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/31/woolly-mammoth-dna-cloning
im sure you can figure out jesus dna
In 1988, radiocarbon dating by three different laboratories established that the shroud's linen material was produced between the years 1260 and 1390
your own source disagrees it was jesus's
unless your saying jesus died at 1260
Christmas is over.
On the contrary. Your vision is EXACTLY supported by our current societies. Like I proved with researches and data, oppression against women because of their gender is still a things and women are still GLOBALLY denied their right to speak about violence and abuse done to them.
In fact for one tweet of a women speaking about a rape situation, there are sometimes hundreds of tweet negating her experience.
As for justice, only a FRACTION of abuse and violence report are treated. As I demonstrated, the majority of the complaint against men are dropped and women find NO reponse from the police or from the justice.
Just to picture you, Trump was accused of rape and still free and Macron - who btw just installed a far right law - just defended an actor accused by multiple women of rape and who sexualize a CHILD in front of a camera.
So no. My thinking is not the status co, it has never been. Its YOUR thinking, the thinking that women are exagerating who is the hegemonic vision in our modern world.
Again, we wouldn't need multiple #metoo if our vision was hegemonic.
I just did. Pretty much all the person in power over the world right now are ok to say that feminism is ok until its going too far and agrees to say that women and the left, right now, are going to far, that patriarchy is not a thing, that there is no system oppression of domination and that there is no systemic racism. Again the reason is simple, we live in a world of LIBERALS, meaning CAPITALISTS, in other words, we live in a world where feminism is only used for profit by people in power.
Our vision, the leftist one, is therefore NON DOMINANT. We ALWAYS have to battle to be heard. In fact you can see an example of that right now on this forum. Those in power here, mods and staff, consider that my vision is delusional, I have to BATTLE everyday to make the staff recognize a highly problematic remark and I have been called a "woke" multiple time by the staff itself. And I'm ALONE against a dozen of people telling me that I'm delusional and too woke.
Again, your vision, the vision that I'm exagerating, the vision that there is no such thing as a system of domination and oppression is HEGEMONIC in ALL places of power.
THe right are literally the liberals, they are EVERYWHERE in power. You are confusing the right with the conservative right and the far right.
If Biden (Israel) Macron (Immigration law) have proven something this past week and month is that liberals are NOT on the side of the people; the oppressed or the left.. they are on the side of the upper class and the right side of the political spectrum, sometimes even of the far right side.
THen why did she lost ? If our vision is an hegemonic vision in the american society, why did she lost ? A literal racist and sexist was projected into power (Also don't forget that Hilary is not a leftist, she is a liberal and a warmonger)
Are you sure about that information ?
https://bylinetimes.com/2023/02/10/...files-trump-not-biden-tried-to-censor-tweets/
It was not said it was shown. Feminists are able to see when people are using their view to make money. THe reason is that those idea are most of the time twisted and missinterprated.
THey want to appeal to progress, simply because history has proven that progress makes money. THere is no reason to appeal to a backward vision of society when we know that the chances are that society will evolve toward more progress (its not really the case, but it is in leaders heads). They want to be remember as someone good by history and not bigots or backward people. So they uses feminists ideas.
But because they are liberals, they don't understand those ideas. THey missuses them for the most part. And its up to feminist to make damage control after the fact because it ALWAYS bounce back on feminists and the left, and not the liberals that are doing Sh*tty things.
Do you want a list of movie where there are transphobic trope ? I can give it to you if you want.
ANd like you said, the average joe is not pushing trans inclusion, the reason ? Its NOT the HEGEMONIC vision in society.
Society is still foundamentally :
- Sexist
- Transphobe
- Racist
- Homophobe
- Capitalist
DUde, you are priviledging far right journal over scientific research, you are not being objective here. Plus there is no article here. And one instance of one particular situation is not and has NEVER BEEN the representation of a systemic issue. I told you the REAL reasons why men are in the streets, the SCIENTIFIC one. So be humble and listen to them.
Yes, that's one of the problem of PATRIARCHY. I talked about that in my last post, did you read ?
THe difference is that Tejas and nameless (or you) are basing their "I'm am correct" on nothing but rumors, feelings, far right propaganda and intellectual lazyness. I'm basing mine on factual data report and scientific research. Who do you think hold the most value in their hands in term of argumentation here ?
The fact that they are only based on your own feelings, some random article of a far right journal and what you here on the internet about woke and leftist people.
Nothing you say is based on scientific reasearch or correct data report.
It goes so far that you are even going to the limit of saying that the science that challenges your point of view is not science because .... feelings I guess ?
So you literally ignore data reports and all the scientific papers that I've shared...
Good to know that you don't read what you criticize.
I did. I literally shared more than 15 peer reviewed research papers and data report about the situation of women. But go ahead, tell me that I'm the one that is providing no sources.
FFS
No you can't mate, simply because those are clear data and good scientific researches. But you didn't read them, how could you tell ?
On the contrary. Your vision is EXACTLY supported by our current societies. Like I proved with researches and data, oppression against women because of their gender is still a things and women are still GLOBALLY denied their right to speak about violence and abuse done to them.
In fact for one tweet of a women speaking about a rape situation, there are sometimes hundreds of tweet negating her experience.
As for justice, only a FRACTION of abuse and violence report are treated. As I demonstrated, the majority of the complaint against men are dropped and women find NO reponse from the police or from the justice.
Just to picture you, Trump was accused of rape and still free and Macron - who btw just installed a far right law - just defended an actor accused by multiple women of rape and who sexualize a CHILD in front of a camera.
So no. My thinking is not the status co, it has never been. Its YOUR thinking, the thinking that women are exagerating who is the hegemonic vision in our modern world.
Again, we wouldn't need multiple #metoo if our vision was hegemonic.
I just did. Pretty much all the person in power over the world right now are ok to say that feminism is ok until its going too far and agrees to say that women and the left, right now, are going to far, that patriarchy is not a thing, that there is no system oppression of domination and that there is no systemic racism. Again the reason is simple, we live in a world of LIBERALS, meaning CAPITALISTS, in other words, we live in a world where feminism is only used for profit by people in power.
Our vision, the leftist one, is therefore NON DOMINANT. We ALWAYS have to battle to be heard. In fact you can see an example of that right now on this forum. Those in power here, mods and staff, consider that my vision is delusional, I have to BATTLE everyday to make the staff recognize a highly problematic remark and I have been called a "woke" multiple time by the staff itself. And I'm ALONE against a dozen of people telling me that I'm delusional and too woke.
Again, your vision, the vision that I'm exagerating, the vision that there is no such thing as a system of domination and oppression is HEGEMONIC in ALL places of power.
THe right are literally the liberals, they are EVERYWHERE in power. You are confusing the right with the conservative right and the far right.
If Biden (Israel) Macron (Immigration law) have proven something this past week and month is that liberals are NOT on the side of the people; the oppressed or the left.. they are on the side of the upper class and the right side of the political spectrum, sometimes even of the far right side.
THen why did she lost ? If our vision is an hegemonic vision in the american society, why did she lost ? A literal racist and sexist was projected into power (Also don't forget that Hilary is not a leftist, she is a liberal and a warmonger)
Are you sure about that information ?
https://bylinetimes.com/2023/02/10/...files-trump-not-biden-tried-to-censor-tweets/
It was not said it was shown. Feminists are able to see when people are using their view to make money. THe reason is that those idea are most of the time twisted and missinterprated.
THey want to appeal to progress, simply because history has proven that progress makes money. THere is no reason to appeal to a backward vision of society when we know that the chances are that society will evolve toward more progress (its not really the case, but it is in leaders heads). They want to be remember as someone good by history and not bigots or backward people. So they uses feminists ideas.
But because they are liberals, they don't understand those ideas. THey missuses them for the most part. And its up to feminist to make damage control after the fact because it ALWAYS bounce back on feminists and the left, and not the liberals that are doing Sh*tty things.
Do you want a list of movie where there are transphobic trope ? I can give it to you if you want.
ANd like you said, the average joe is not pushing trans inclusion, the reason ? Its NOT the HEGEMONIC vision in society.
Society is still foundamentally :
- Sexist
- Transphobe
- Racist
- Homophobe
- Capitalist
DUde, you are priviledging far right journal over scientific research, you are not being objective here. Plus there is no article here. And one instance of one particular situation is not and has NEVER BEEN the representation of a systemic issue. I told you the REAL reasons why men are in the streets, the SCIENTIFIC one. So be humble and listen to them.
Yes, that's one of the problem of PATRIARCHY. I talked about that in my last post, did you read ?
THe difference is that Tejas and nameless (or you) are basing their "I'm am correct" on nothing but rumors, feelings, far right propaganda and intellectual lazyness. I'm basing mine on factual data report and scientific research. Who do you think hold the most value in their hands in term of argumentation here ?
The fact that they are only based on your own feelings, some random article of a far right journal and what you here on the internet about woke and leftist people.
Nothing you say is based on scientific reasearch or correct data report.
It goes so far that you are even going to the limit of saying that the science that challenges your point of view is not science because .... feelings I guess ?
So you literally ignore data reports and all the scientific papers that I've shared...
Good to know that you don't read what you criticize.
I did. I literally shared more than 15 peer reviewed research papers and data report about the situation of women. But go ahead, tell me that I'm the one that is providing no sources.
FFS
No you can't mate, simply because those are clear data and good scientific researches. But you didn't read them, how could you tell ?
I sent a video from a historian explaining all evidences.The dude is too autistic to respect the christmas truce.
lol christmas only ends January 1 for me
Post automatically merged:
Christmas is over.
On the contrary. Your vision is EXACTLY supported by our current societies. Like I proved with researches and data, oppression against women because of their gender is still a things and women are still GLOBALLY denied their right to speak about violence and abuse done to them.
In fact for one tweet of a women speaking about a rape situation, there are sometimes hundreds of tweet negating her experience.
As for justice, only a FRACTION of abuse and violence report are treated. As I demonstrated, the majority of the complaint against men are dropped and women find NO reponse from the police or from the justice.
Just to picture you, Trump was accused of rape and still free and Macron - who btw just installed a far right law - just defended an actor accused by multiple women of rape and who sexualize a CHILD in front of a camera.
So no. My thinking is not the status co, it has never been. Its YOUR thinking, the thinking that women are exagerating who is the hegemonic vision in our modern world.
Again, we wouldn't need multiple #metoo if our vision was hegemonic.
I just did. Pretty much all the person in power over the world right now are ok to say that feminism is ok until its going too far and agrees to say that women and the left, right now, are going to far, that patriarchy is not a thing, that there is no system oppression of domination and that there is no systemic racism. Again the reason is simple, we live in a world of LIBERALS, meaning CAPITALISTS, in other words, we live in a world where feminism is only used for profit by people in power.
Our vision, the leftist one, is therefore NON DOMINANT. We ALWAYS have to battle to be heard. In fact you can see an example of that right now on this forum. Those in power here, mods and staff, consider that my vision is delusional, I have to BATTLE everyday to make the staff recognize a highly problematic remark and I have been called a "woke" multiple time by the staff itself. And I'm ALONE against a dozen of people telling me that I'm delusional and too woke.
Again, your vision, the vision that I'm exagerating, the vision that there is no such thing as a system of domination and oppression is HEGEMONIC in ALL places of power.
THe right are literally the liberals, they are EVERYWHERE in power. You are confusing the right with the conservative right and the far right.
If Biden (Israel) Macron (Immigration law) have proven something this past week and month is that liberals are NOT on the side of the people; the oppressed or the left.. they are on the side of the upper class and the right side of the political spectrum, sometimes even of the far right side.
THen why did she lost ? If our vision is an hegemonic vision in the american society, why did she lost ? A literal racist and sexist was projected into power (Also don't forget that Hilary is not a leftist, she is a liberal and a warmonger)
Are you sure about that information ?
https://bylinetimes.com/2023/02/10/...files-trump-not-biden-tried-to-censor-tweets/
It was not said it was shown. Feminists are able to see when people are using their view to make money. THe reason is that those idea are most of the time twisted and missinterprated.
THey want to appeal to progress, simply because history has proven that progress makes money. THere is no reason to appeal to a backward vision of society when we know that the chances are that society will evolve toward more progress (its not really the case, but it is in leaders heads). They want to be remember as someone good by history and not bigots or backward people. So they uses feminists ideas.
But because they are liberals, they don't understand those ideas. THey missuses them for the most part. And its up to feminist to make damage control after the fact because it ALWAYS bounce back on feminists and the left, and not the liberals that are doing Sh*tty things.
Do you want a list of movie where there are transphobic trope ? I can give it to you if you want.
ANd like you said, the average joe is not pushing trans inclusion, the reason ? Its NOT the HEGEMONIC vision in society.
Society is still foundamentally :
- Sexist
- Transphobe
- Racist
- Homophobe
- Capitalist
DUde, you are priviledging far right journal over scientific research, you are not being objective here. Plus there is no article here. And one instance of one particular situation is not and has NEVER BEEN the representation of a systemic issue. I told you the REAL reasons why men are in the streets, the SCIENTIFIC one. So be humble and listen to them.
Yes, that's one of the problem of PATRIARCHY. I talked about that in my last post, did you read ?
THe difference is that Tejas and nameless (or you) are basing their "I'm am correct" on nothing but rumors, feelings, far right propaganda and intellectual lazyness. I'm basing mine on factual data report and scientific research. Who do you think hold the most value in their hands in term of argumentation here ?
The fact that they are only based on your own feelings, some random article of a far right journal and what you here on the internet about woke and leftist people.
Nothing you say is based on scientific reasearch or correct data report.
It goes so far that you are even going to the limit of saying that the science that challenges your point of view is not science because .... feelings I guess ?
So you literally ignore data reports and all the scientific papers that I've shared...
Good to know that you don't read what you criticize.
I did. I literally shared more than 15 peer reviewed research papers and data report about the situation of women. But go ahead, tell me that I'm the one that is providing no sources.
FFS
No you can't mate, simply because those are clear data and good scientific researches. But you didn't read them, how could you tell ?
On the contrary. Your vision is EXACTLY supported by our current societies. Like I proved with researches and data, oppression against women because of their gender is still a things and women are still GLOBALLY denied their right to speak about violence and abuse done to them.
In fact for one tweet of a women speaking about a rape situation, there are sometimes hundreds of tweet negating her experience.
As for justice, only a FRACTION of abuse and violence report are treated. As I demonstrated, the majority of the complaint against men are dropped and women find NO reponse from the police or from the justice.
Just to picture you, Trump was accused of rape and still free and Macron - who btw just installed a far right law - just defended an actor accused by multiple women of rape and who sexualize a CHILD in front of a camera.
So no. My thinking is not the status co, it has never been. Its YOUR thinking, the thinking that women are exagerating who is the hegemonic vision in our modern world.
Again, we wouldn't need multiple #metoo if our vision was hegemonic.
I just did. Pretty much all the person in power over the world right now are ok to say that feminism is ok until its going too far and agrees to say that women and the left, right now, are going to far, that patriarchy is not a thing, that there is no system oppression of domination and that there is no systemic racism. Again the reason is simple, we live in a world of LIBERALS, meaning CAPITALISTS, in other words, we live in a world where feminism is only used for profit by people in power.
Our vision, the leftist one, is therefore NON DOMINANT. We ALWAYS have to battle to be heard. In fact you can see an example of that right now on this forum. Those in power here, mods and staff, consider that my vision is delusional, I have to BATTLE everyday to make the staff recognize a highly problematic remark and I have been called a "woke" multiple time by the staff itself. And I'm ALONE against a dozen of people telling me that I'm delusional and too woke.
Again, your vision, the vision that I'm exagerating, the vision that there is no such thing as a system of domination and oppression is HEGEMONIC in ALL places of power.
THe right are literally the liberals, they are EVERYWHERE in power. You are confusing the right with the conservative right and the far right.
If Biden (Israel) Macron (Immigration law) have proven something this past week and month is that liberals are NOT on the side of the people; the oppressed or the left.. they are on the side of the upper class and the right side of the political spectrum, sometimes even of the far right side.
THen why did she lost ? If our vision is an hegemonic vision in the american society, why did she lost ? A literal racist and sexist was projected into power (Also don't forget that Hilary is not a leftist, she is a liberal and a warmonger)
Are you sure about that information ?
https://bylinetimes.com/2023/02/10/...files-trump-not-biden-tried-to-censor-tweets/
It was not said it was shown. Feminists are able to see when people are using their view to make money. THe reason is that those idea are most of the time twisted and missinterprated.
THey want to appeal to progress, simply because history has proven that progress makes money. THere is no reason to appeal to a backward vision of society when we know that the chances are that society will evolve toward more progress (its not really the case, but it is in leaders heads). They want to be remember as someone good by history and not bigots or backward people. So they uses feminists ideas.
But because they are liberals, they don't understand those ideas. THey missuses them for the most part. And its up to feminist to make damage control after the fact because it ALWAYS bounce back on feminists and the left, and not the liberals that are doing Sh*tty things.
Do you want a list of movie where there are transphobic trope ? I can give it to you if you want.
ANd like you said, the average joe is not pushing trans inclusion, the reason ? Its NOT the HEGEMONIC vision in society.
Society is still foundamentally :
- Sexist
- Transphobe
- Racist
- Homophobe
- Capitalist
DUde, you are priviledging far right journal over scientific research, you are not being objective here. Plus there is no article here. And one instance of one particular situation is not and has NEVER BEEN the representation of a systemic issue. I told you the REAL reasons why men are in the streets, the SCIENTIFIC one. So be humble and listen to them.
Yes, that's one of the problem of PATRIARCHY. I talked about that in my last post, did you read ?
THe difference is that Tejas and nameless (or you) are basing their "I'm am correct" on nothing but rumors, feelings, far right propaganda and intellectual lazyness. I'm basing mine on factual data report and scientific research. Who do you think hold the most value in their hands in term of argumentation here ?
The fact that they are only based on your own feelings, some random article of a far right journal and what you here on the internet about woke and leftist people.
Nothing you say is based on scientific reasearch or correct data report.
It goes so far that you are even going to the limit of saying that the science that challenges your point of view is not science because .... feelings I guess ?
So you literally ignore data reports and all the scientific papers that I've shared...
Good to know that you don't read what you criticize.
I did. I literally shared more than 15 peer reviewed research papers and data report about the situation of women. But go ahead, tell me that I'm the one that is providing no sources.
FFS
No you can't mate, simply because those are clear data and good scientific researches. But you didn't read them, how could you tell ?