Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
H
I Saud exactly that. Except that will ALWAYS make life better despite the bad things it brings. Putting on a balance it will always tend to be better.
Yeah? And it can be used to kill terrorists while lowering civils waste. And it can be tracked who sent the order and stuff. There will be counters to that too. Drones can be hacked and shut down. Technology will allow poor country to be on equal foot with rich country.
But as I said it is still far from what you are proposing.
This goes pretty against the proposal of AI that is to think. Why people would be so hurt about it if it is simple a bot like many others we already have nowadays and no one freaks out about it?
Yeah? And it can be used to kill terrorists while lowering civils waste. And it can be tracked who sent the order and stuff. There will be counters to that too. Drones can be hacked and shut down. Technology will allow poor country to be on equal foot with rich country.
But as I said it is still far from what you are proposing.
This goes pretty against the proposal of AI that is to think. Why people would be so hurt about it if it is simple a bot like many others we already have nowadays and no one freaks out about it?
Ok, lets short this up, since most of your quotes are just to try and show how ''good'' you are.
This is the definition according to merriam-webster and if you actually look at the definition you would see that I was clearly speaking about:
>the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group
when I say that almost everyone has ethics. Those principles may not be what you consider moral and agree with your morality (Note: this is the link to the dictionary since you seem to mistaken both. Look at 4) but it does not mean that they don't exist. There's even some debate about distorted ethical values of serial-killers since many seem to think that they are doing the word a favor (with plenty of evidence that this is just a tactic to get empathy).
And since you seem to be unable to connect the dots: what this all mean is that every society has those principles of conduct and use them to evaluate what is right or wrong.
No. Presentism is not the phylosophy of time but a fallacy where someone looks at the actions of those in the past and instead of considering what they are doing using their ethics and situation at the time use their own values and morals. This warps the analysis and makes it almost useless. When you try to evaluate actions of people in the past using your very narrow set of ethics (that not even everyone in your own time may agree) you are acting like a stupid retard.
I don't even know where did you took the idea about philosophy of time.
Yes. Progress(in this case look at the use as a verb-to develop to a higher, better, or more advanced stage or noun-gradual betterment) is something that happen with wars, usually technological progress. That's why usually a normal person states in which area the progress happen and that's also why I divided the post in different kinds of progress. Only a absolute retard would argue that the progress on one subject equals progress in all subjects. War usually brings technological progress that can be used to improve society as a whole later.
Again, open a book.
Remember when I said that only a retard would argue that a progress in a field equals progress in all fields?
Yeah, forces it to progress, develop.(again- to develop to a higher, better, or more advanced stage). You would know that if you had looked at the definition of progress.
You should open a history book. The French Revolution was a period of 10 years and it ended up causing wars that affected the whole Europe, eventually leading to Napoleon rise(some may argue that the american revolution as just a new stage of the revolutionary wars). While some events like the storming of Bastille can be considered riots, the war of the first coalization-as a example- wasn't. Again, try to at least research the subject before talking bullshit. Even if you fucking listened to the national anthem of france you would know that they were fighting against outsiders.
Actually most of the background of the war was not because of civil rights but based on economical issues. Most of the merchants were more afraid of not getting their money back than the rights of the common man. The whole issue with Necker and the storming of Bastille could be avoided. Even when they won, they didn't abolish the king at first. The development of fundamental rights wasn't like you think.
According to your morality and lack of understanding of the subject? Maybe. Creating rules for military engagements, that even if not always followed, could be used to avoid more deaths in subsequent wars is progress. I recommend you look at the site of the red cross to see why they value the Convention so much: This is the link. The world would be absolutely a worse place without this convention and other treaties that come after it. Trying to dismiss it as it is unimportant is disgusting.
Yeah. That's directly what I stated. War bring progress. During the war technology advances in a quick way and can be brought to the masses earlier.
That's stupid. If war accelerate technological progress it is literally taking a shorter time. i.e: a shortcut.
You keep making those stupid comments because you are too lazy or dumb to even look at the definitions of the words and use them in a narrow way, while ignoring all the other meanings.
Oh, I can hurt the feelings of a useless bum that just waste resources and complain online.
But ok. I will stop replying to you now. This is getting tiresome.
Good luck and I hope you get better.
This is the definition according to merriam-webster and if you actually look at the definition you would see that I was clearly speaking about:
>the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group
when I say that almost everyone has ethics. Those principles may not be what you consider moral and agree with your morality (Note: this is the link to the dictionary since you seem to mistaken both. Look at 4) but it does not mean that they don't exist. There's even some debate about distorted ethical values of serial-killers since many seem to think that they are doing the word a favor (with plenty of evidence that this is just a tactic to get empathy).
And since you seem to be unable to connect the dots: what this all mean is that every society has those principles of conduct and use them to evaluate what is right or wrong.
No. Presentism is not the phylosophy of time but a fallacy where someone looks at the actions of those in the past and instead of considering what they are doing using their ethics and situation at the time use their own values and morals. This warps the analysis and makes it almost useless. When you try to evaluate actions of people in the past using your very narrow set of ethics (that not even everyone in your own time may agree) you are acting like a stupid retard.
I don't even know where did you took the idea about philosophy of time.
Yes. Progress(in this case look at the use as a verb-to develop to a higher, better, or more advanced stage or noun-gradual betterment) is something that happen with wars, usually technological progress. That's why usually a normal person states in which area the progress happen and that's also why I divided the post in different kinds of progress. Only a absolute retard would argue that the progress on one subject equals progress in all subjects. War usually brings technological progress that can be used to improve society as a whole later.
Again, open a book.
Remember when I said that only a retard would argue that a progress in a field equals progress in all fields?
Yeah, forces it to progress, develop.(again- to develop to a higher, better, or more advanced stage). You would know that if you had looked at the definition of progress.
You should open a history book. The French Revolution was a period of 10 years and it ended up causing wars that affected the whole Europe, eventually leading to Napoleon rise(some may argue that the american revolution as just a new stage of the revolutionary wars). While some events like the storming of Bastille can be considered riots, the war of the first coalization-as a example- wasn't. Again, try to at least research the subject before talking bullshit. Even if you fucking listened to the national anthem of france you would know that they were fighting against outsiders.
Actually most of the background of the war was not because of civil rights but based on economical issues. Most of the merchants were more afraid of not getting their money back than the rights of the common man. The whole issue with Necker and the storming of Bastille could be avoided. Even when they won, they didn't abolish the king at first. The development of fundamental rights wasn't like you think.
According to your morality and lack of understanding of the subject? Maybe. Creating rules for military engagements, that even if not always followed, could be used to avoid more deaths in subsequent wars is progress. I recommend you look at the site of the red cross to see why they value the Convention so much: This is the link. The world would be absolutely a worse place without this convention and other treaties that come after it. Trying to dismiss it as it is unimportant is disgusting.
Yeah. That's directly what I stated. War bring progress. During the war technology advances in a quick way and can be brought to the masses earlier.
That's stupid. If war accelerate technological progress it is literally taking a shorter time. i.e: a shortcut.
You keep making those stupid comments because you are too lazy or dumb to even look at the definitions of the words and use them in a narrow way, while ignoring all the other meanings.
Oh, I can hurt the feelings of a useless bum that just waste resources and complain online.
But ok. I will stop replying to you now. This is getting tiresome.
Good luck and I hope you get better.
Should we stop producing more and more in our economy and start be more ecological despite losing quality of life and whatnot ? If we do so, how would this plan even be applied on the scale of the earth ? Considering that war material should stop being produced too. Which implies world peace. Is it even possible to save the planet if the only way is degrowth ?
Are AIs gonna start a new era like in the movie Wall-E that is gonna turn everyone into a fat person using a wheelchair to move because AIs and robots will sustain our quality of life ? In other words, we won’t need to work anymore and only machines will sustain our quality of life ?
Degrowth can mean to stop using oil for instance. Which means that things that we do easily now can become harder to achieve. Wether it’s building a house, travelling, going to work or lots of things from daily life.
Degrowth can mean to stop using oil for instance. Which means that things that we do easily now can become harder to achieve. Wether it’s building a house, travelling, going to work or lots of things from daily life.
Another stupid word. What is fcking growing at this point?!? Trees are sick, pollinators nearing extinction, toxins, forever chemicals and microplastic everywhere and affecting embryonic development, cognitive abilities ,hormones and overall health
What tf is still growing ?
Look around you and tell me
What tf is still growing ?
Look around you and tell me
Another stupid word. What is fcking growing at this point?!? Trees are sick, pollinators nearing extinction, toxins, forever chemicals and microplastic everywhere and affecting embryonic development, cognitive abilities ,hormones and overall health
What tf is still growing ? Look around you and tell me
What tf is still growing ?
Look around you and tell me
The GDB is growing. New techs are being created every now and then. More and more stuff are being built. It’s INoVaTiOn 🤡 Resources are being used and blablablabla