Controversial General Political Discussion

[Gaimon The Pirate]

This was yersterday :


But if you really want me to quote you a lot of post I can do that.

You guys don't realize that in this threads, I'm one of those who came back the most on their words.

You guys are focusing so much on the fact that I'm an evil leftist who targetting you for defending toxic idea and labeling you all day long that you don't realize that I'm actually the one who is the most reasonnable.

Being radical doesn't mean that I'm stupid or incapable of questionning myself.

Yeah, you are actually posting that you admit that you were wrong about a meaningless thing that you don't even know.
Admit you were wrong about your carrot theories.
[automerge]1717191537[/automerge]

Scientifics / Specialists and experts on different fields / Political militants on the fields / People who are involved in a particular fight / National and international press agency Etc.

In other words, people who know.

Who are the experts on american politics? The same who claimed that Trump election was done by Russia? The same that hide and protect the people on Epstein's list?

 

[Logiko]

Yeah, you are actually posting that you admit that you were wrong about a meaningless thing that you don't even know.
Admit you were wrong about your carrot theories.

I already did that multiple time. My theory was completely wrong. You are confusing the theory and the reasonning.

To give you an image, saying that my reasonning was wrong would be like saying to a scientist making a theory that the scientific process is wrong.

My theory and therefore "I" was wrong, but my reasonning, ergo the process behind the theory was correct.

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

I already did that multiple time. My theory was completely wrong. You are confusing the theory and the reasonning.

To give you an image, saying that my reasonning was wrong would be like saying to a scientist making a theory that the scientific process is wrong.

My theory and there "I" was wrong, but my reasonning, ergo the process behind the theory was correct.

What you are writing is retarded.
Your reasoning was wrong because reality disproven your theory and the reasoning that lead to it.
Because you based your entire reason on 1. Fanfiction 2. Wishful thinking 3. Climing on mirrrors.

Just to prove how ignorant you are, making a theory is the first/second step of the scientific process:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

An hypothesis (your hypothesis) got disproven at the first step. You didn't question your methodology, you still claim your methodology was perfect even if it was disproven.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

That science shit posting is extremely dumb and y'all are weebs

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

That science shit posting is extremely dumb and y'all are weebs

Accusing people of being weebs on a manga forum my man

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Accusing people of being weebs on a manga forum my man

Y'all should stop talking about politics because you're so dumb

 

[Toby D. Dog]

Where did this malakith guy crawl out now? Wasn't he the IDF apologist?

I think so. Mf just came here to spew a bunch of nonesense ignoring the fact that the jury itself was vetted with the utmost care (even one of them was a guy who got his news from truth social)

Mfs like him are just here to yap and cry when their favorite criminals are held accountable. Whenever their side of the aisle want to indict Biden or Hilary, I’m all for it. Let’s stop pretending like Trump is not a criminal and corrupt. He’s just like all the rest of them. He’s just funny and charismatic, that’s why these idiots like him.
[automerge]1717192582[/automerge]

Accusing people of being weebs on a manga forum my man

Weebs are cringe.

 

[Logiko]

Just to prove how ignorant you are, making a theory is the first/second step of the scientific process:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

You should check that

Most scientist will actually tell you that the carcan "scientific method" is missleading.

https://www.snexplores.org/article/problems-scientific-method


Some scientists prefer to it the term "scientific practice" or "scientific thinking". Its much more in line with what they actually do.

But you highlighted one of the problematic of science: human are bias and EVEN the scientific process can be bias. That's why scientific rely on a LOT of informations, data, experiences, reproductibility etc. Indeed an historian can be bias, that's why their discipline must be done rigorously.

Just like others scientific disciplines, escaping bias can be very hard, that's why we rely on the scientific practice and good ethics.

- [SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE] - Systemic Racism's impact in science - Major scientific journal "Science"
- [VIDEO] - A crisis in Science : Psychology. The problem with scientific publications and P-Hacking
- [STUDY] - There is a Gender bias in research : How does it affect evidence based medicine
- [STUDY] - Women researchers are cited less than men
- [SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Women researchers are cited less than men and what can be done about it
- [STUDY] - Gender Bias in science - Women ask different questions in social sciences

You didn't question your methodology, you still claim your methodology was perfect even if it was disproven.

Actually I did question my methodology, multiple time. BUt you guys were too focused on trying to prove me wrong to notice that.

I changed multiple time the way to have this theory. In fact at first its was full of confirmation bias and I changed the way I searched for it. And at the end I completely changed the process.

But you simply didn't care to take a look.

You guys actually don't care, since you never read. The thread about Carrot that last day was a proof of that, you admitted that yourself.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Weebs are cringe.

Yes. I'm only here to make Conejo Blanco and Loro posts. This shit manga ain't worth it

 

[Logiko]

This shit manga ain't worth it

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Conejo?

 

[Toby D. Dog]

Btw idiots. I’m from NY. There’s still a sizable chunk or republicans here. I grew up in queens bordering Nassau county, which is a red district. Stop coping and malding. You all would rather call this a sham before you actually look at the indictments objectively and analyze the actual evidence.
[automerge]1717192900[/automerge]

Yes. I'm only here to make Conejo Blanco and Loro posts. This shit manga ain't worth it

You’re cringe.

 

[Logiko]

Conejo?

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

You should check that

Actually I did question my methodology, multiple time. BUt you guys were too focused on trying to prove me wrong to notice that.

I changed multiple time the way to have this theory. In fact at first its was full of confirmation bias and I changed the way I searched for it. And at the end I completely changed the process.

But you simply didn't care to take a look.

You guys actually don't care, since you never read. The thread about Carrot that last day was a proof of that, you admitted that yourself.

So now you say that the scientific method (that you claimed to follow one post ago) is actually a new scientific method because some new age failed scientist say it's wrong.
Sadly, our scientific word exist on the basis that is provable. Repeatable. A methodology that carries in itself the evidence.

Your theories were shit, you called people disagreeing with you pigeons. And now you act humble, I don't forget what you are, and you may hide behind this mask but you know you are a failure.
Retard.

 

[Logiko]

So now you say that the scientific method (that you claimed to follow one post ago) is actually a new scientific method because some new age failed scientist say it's wrong.

What ?


Its just that calling the scientific process as "scientific method" is missleading. Simply because there is no "method", there is a practice and science can be made in a various different ways.

you called people disagreeing with you pigeons.

Nop. In reality I never called anyone pidgeon. I made a reference to a famous quote about pidgeon and chest. But its fun that you are using the ONE AND SINGLE NAME CALLING in my ENTIRE HISTORY on this forum and completely invisibilize the fact that at the time I was facing 5 insults a day from multiple members



Its says how much intellectually lazy you guys are. And in reality I was right to call you toxic there since you are supporting real toxic ideas and people here.

Retard.

Case and point.

 

[Ravagerblade]

Where did this malakith guy crawl out now? Wasn't he the IDF apologist?
[automerge]1717190949[/automerge]

You've the most cringiest political statements here. And you're even more unhinged than nameless. At least he can act like a human being (sometimes, when he's not trying to exorcise the left)

Solis, I'm telling you, stop replying to me. I don't like you. You have nothing good to say, your so negative towards myself and anything I say no matter what it's been.

 

[Logiko]

Solis, I'm telling you, stop replying to me. I don't like you. You have nothing good to say, your so negative towards myself and anything I say no matter what it's been.

You are not really saying anything positive here mate...

Everything you say supports either the hatred of others based on their identity, or toxic ideologies or toxic persons.

Time to wake up.

 

[Ravagerblade]

Scientifics / Specialists and experts on different fields / Political militants on the fields / People who are involved in a particular fight / National and international press agency Etc.

In other words, people who know.

Hm hmm... I disagree with your field of "experts".

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

What ?


Its just that calling the scientific process as "scientific method" is missleading. Simply because there is no "method", there is a practice and science can be made in a various different ways.



Nop. In reality I never called anyone pidgeon. I made a reference to a famous quote about pidgeon and chest. But its fun that you are using the ONE AND SINGLE NAME CALLING in my ENTIRE HISTORY on this forum and completely invisibilize the fact that at the time I was facing 5 insults a day from multiple members



Its says how much intellectually lazy you guys are. And in reality I was right to call you toxic there since you are supporting real toxic ideas and people here.



Case and point.

You are a retard, not offending you.
You deflect any criticism, act like a baby crying all the time that people are mean to me while talking in the most passive aggressive way possible.
It's just ridicolous that you probably do the same in real life, and we all know how that's going for you.

 

[Ravagerblade]

You are not really saying anything positive here mate...

Everything you say supports either the hatred of others based on their identity, or toxic ideologies or toxic persons.

Time to wake up.

That is such a broad description of it all, speaking about it further is a waste of time.