Controversial General Political Discussion

[Okamakama]

I absolutely hate how much she mute censors her speech, it's impossible to understand what she's even saying.

I... don't remember her doing that? I know she sometimes avoids saying the word directly, but it's quite easy to intuit what she means.

 

[NAMELESS]

Like this guy in murica who been printing guns with a 3d printer 😂😂🙃 [automerge]1727967689[/automerge] Yes Surprised you know this channel, it's kinda "woke"

Like the guy that killed Shinzo Abe or the 171309539015813 cartels that make their own gear.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

I... don't remember her doing that? I know she sometimes avoids saying the word directly, but it's quite easy to intuit what she means.

Maybe it's gotten better but she half mutes certain words. When you're watching with subtitles it's even worse.
[automerge]1727968215[/automerge]

guy that killed Shinzo Abe

I cannot share my opinion on this one 🤐

 

[Okamakama]

Maybe it's gotten better but she half mutes certain words. When you're watching with subtitles it's even worse.

Perhaps, but it could mean she's gotten worse. Haven't seen anything from the podcast/episodes for the past 4 months. But she had some banger videos. The humidifier deaths, the Korean shopping mall one, the ferry disaster, the street crush.... and of course, some of the serial killing ones.

 

[NAMELESS]

Maybe it's gotten better but she half mutes certain words. When you're watching with subtitles it's even worse.
[automerge]1727968215[/automerge]

I cannot share my opinion on this one 🤐

why?

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

why?

I don't understand YouTube censorship and demonetization either. Some censor every second word and others show half decomposing severed heads

 

[NAMELESS]

I don't understand YouTube censorship and demonetization either. Some censor every second word and others show half decomposing severed heads

you a youtuber?

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

you a youtuber?

No. That's why I'm saying I don't understand how this works.

 

[NAMELESS]

No. That's why I'm saying I don't understand how this works.

and why is it you can't talk about Shinzo Abe?

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

and why is it you can't talk about Shinzo Abe?

Sh*t u* r*dn*ck and don't act like I'm your friend

 

[NAMELESS]

Sh*t u* r*dn*ck and don't act like I'm your friend

baka

 

[Ravagerblade]

 

[Okamakama]

Shinzo...chan.

 

[Logiko]

I don't understand the argument that giving guns out to people will create MORE violence. Gun crime is not prevalent in many countries that allow people to keep guns (take Switzerland, for example). The issue with gun crime lies not in the gun itself.

Because you don't take into account the fact that people are not trained and that the fact of having a Gun alone in your hand increase the chances for violence and panic to happen. Without counting the rate of the accident.

More gun do not reduce crime. It only create more chance for violence ... and more weapon on the market. It simply a bad solution.

Yeah, of course, same scientists that claim bearded men can be women.

If you don't like science, don't be surprised to be called anti-scientific.

Ban guns, and people will simply use other weapons. Ban guns, and the people are more vulnerable to an authoritarian state as mentioned above.

Which, as I said, is fallacious.

Less gun means less gun violences and therefore stopping other weapon is a lot more easy. Thinking that it's authoritarian to want to stop people from having dangerous weapon is the peak of fallaciousness. It's also wrong on all levels.

Less gun means less gun violence. More gun do not reduce crime but only helps violence to spread.

If you are more afraid of a baseball bat than a gun, maybe ask yourself two or three questions.

Exactly.
De-arming the population is the first thing colonizers do to prevent uprisings.

Stop comparing a reform for less violence with a colonization process please.

Their response is''but a gun kills more people than a knife''

Which is true.

Again, if you are as afraid of a gun than you are of a knife, there are questions to ask yourself.

It's funny, all you guys are in synch with this conservative rethoric and yet, you don't understand why i'm generalizing the ideologies on this thread

Take a good look

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

oh boy, i want to home school my future kids.

I feel sorry for your kids:shame:
People like you prove that homeschooling is a bad idea

people are overly paranoid over small issues nowadays

Says the guy who gave me and emotes when I predicted the escalation of wars some years ago and went silent when I was proven right

 

[Okamakama]

Being pro-gun is not conservative.

Consequently, having one conservative view does not make you a conservative.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Because you don't take into account the fact that people are not trained and that the fact of having a Gun alone in your hand increase the chances for violence and panic to happen. Without counting the rate of the accident.

And this is the single most dumbest argument they keep bringing up. To try to convince people that self defense is in fact DANGEROUS and nit defending oneself keeps you safe. Not only does it treat people like toddlers but it assumes that training and practice are foe some reason not possible.

Being pro-gun is not conservative.

Consequently, having one conservative view does not make you a conservative.

Yea but you are a conservative

 

[Okamakama]

And this is the single most dumbest argument they keep bringing up. To try to convince people that self defense is in fact DANGEROUS and nit defending oneself keeps you safe. Not only does it treat people like toddlers but it assumes that training and practice are foe some reason not possible.

Yea but you are a conservative

I am a conservative, true. Nothing wrong with that. Holding a conservative perspective does not mean I ascribe to all conservative beliefs, mind you.

I said the above in defence of you - because you most certainly aren't, but Logiko was painting you with that brush by saying: "It's funny, all you guys are in synch with this conservative rethoric and yet, you don't understand why i'm generalizing the ideologies on this thread."

 

[AL sama]

No. That's why I'm saying I don't understand how this works.

it depends how a video is made, what it is trying to tell, what's the intended demographic, how the video gets uploaded etc etc

however youtube isn't consistent with any of that so even we youtubers don't fully understand thse things and need to be very careful all the time

 

[NAMELESS]

Because you don't take into account the fact that people are not trained and that the fact of having a Gun alone in your hand increase the chances for violence and panic to happen. Without counting the rate of the accident.

More gun do not reduce crime. It only create more chance for violence ... and more weapon on the market. It simply a bad solution.


If you don't like science, don't be surprised to be called anti-scientific.



Which, as I said, is fallacious.

Less gun means less gun violences and therefore stopping other weapon is a lot more easy. Thinking that it's authoritarian to want to stop people from having dangerous weapon is the peak of fallaciousness. It's also wrong on all levels.

Less gun means less gun violence. More gun do not reduce crime but only helps violence to spread.

If you are more afraid of a baseball bat than a gun, maybe ask yourself two or three questions.



Stop comparing a reform for less violence with a colonization process please.



Which is true.

Again, if you are as afraid of a gun than you are of a knife, there are questions to ask yourself.

It's funny, all you guys are in synch with this conservative rethoric and yet, you don't understand why i'm generalizing the ideologies on this thread

Take a good look

Guns are like cars. You undergo training before getting a license to own/use one. Let me ask you,how much training do you think the average marauder has?