Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
Putin needs to stop with the nuclear weapon threats. It’s the only leverage they have to put pressure on the West but if he does detonate one, then we are all screwed as it will escalate into war that could end humanity.
The US and NATO need to rethink shit. Ukraine isn’t worth WWIII apocalypse. Negotiations need to be made and Trump administration could bridge that discussion since Trump is a beta to Putin. But either way it’s not looking good for Ukraine
The US and NATO need to rethink shit. Ukraine isn’t worth WWIII apocalypse. Negotiations need to be made and Trump administration could bridge that discussion since Trump is a beta to Putin. But either way it’s not looking good for Ukraine
Massive strikes incoming in Kyiv
I will NEVER understand rationale of Modern warfare where enemy directly inform you they gonna attack and give you time for prep
Well Ukraine is doomed either way
Ukraine as we know is gone
Ukraine was already heading into demographics disaster before the war.
Ukrainian refugees ain't returning to Ukraine.
Ukrainians men are dying disproportionately.
Ukrainian sovereignty is pretty much dead.
Big corporation will lease Ukraine's strategic assets for Decades to come and would need summons hordes of immigrants to rebuild the country all because Ukraine need to pay off it's debt.
On the other hand , Russia's progress is VERY slow.
This war could stretch to 5, 10 or even 20 years at this rate or maybe never at all
Ukraine would not be able to retake the occupied territories
Russia won't be able to maintain full authority in annexed and claimed territories
It's seems the Goal of NATO is to extend the war as long as possible to drain Russia, or to get Ukraine into a better negotiating situation
So it's either Forever war or Fragile Truce, with frequent terrorism and skirmishes in the Russian occupied and claimed territories.
If the goal is to drain Russia and save their money, Nato could apply fragile truce and shift Ukraine into insurgency mode, also sponsor insurgency in region with history of separatism like Chechnya.
I will NEVER understand rationale of Modern warfare where enemy directly inform you they gonna attack and give you time for prep
Well Ukraine is doomed either way
Ukraine as we know is gone
Ukraine was already heading into demographics disaster before the war.
Ukrainian refugees ain't returning to Ukraine.
Ukrainians men are dying disproportionately.
Ukrainian sovereignty is pretty much dead.
Big corporation will lease Ukraine's strategic assets for Decades to come and would need summons hordes of immigrants to rebuild the country all because Ukraine need to pay off it's debt.
On the other hand , Russia's progress is VERY slow.
This war could stretch to 5, 10 or even 20 years at this rate or maybe never at all
Ukraine would not be able to retake the occupied territories
Russia won't be able to maintain full authority in annexed and claimed territories
It's seems the Goal of NATO is to extend the war as long as possible to drain Russia, or to get Ukraine into a better negotiating situation
So it's either Forever war or Fragile Truce, with frequent terrorism and skirmishes in the Russian occupied and claimed territories.
If the goal is to drain Russia and save their money, Nato could apply fragile truce and shift Ukraine into insurgency mode, also sponsor insurgency in region with history of separatism like Chechnya.
Bro...this war has been ongoing for centuries. East europe (eurasia aligned) vs west europe.
That's what the cold war has all been about. lol
Ofc this one will last forever. However this Ukraine war will end...as a result another cold war is following.
It's an endless cycle until natural selection decides the last standing.
That's what the cold war has all been about. lol
Ofc this one will last forever. However this Ukraine war will end...as a result another cold war is following.
It's an endless cycle until natural selection decides the last standing.
I'm currently at work but am happy to write up some of my thoughts on the matter as culture and history I find very interesting. These things tend to be very complex and are affected by a million and 1 variables, but here we go:
To preface as this can be a sensitive topic: Everyone is equal in the scope of rights and gov, however humans are not interchangeable. My boss is a woman and she is superior to me in so many ways, I aspire to be as good as her at what we do
Equality in the west was a slow start and one of the first instances was in France late 1600s/early 1700s when a soldier was elevated to noble status (I could be wrong on the timeline please forgive me).
The seed has now been planted
As democracy bloomed and equal rights started taking precedent, we as a society fought for equal rights across the board (women vs men, black vs white). A lot of these things are typically pushed by NGOs and organized social groups.
As these things were achieved you're left with NGOs having the option to say "jobs done let's shut the door" or keep their doors open and push for more. To do this you have to find "inequality" else where.
When you take the cultural norm of "we are all equal" this is actually intended to be as "we are all equal in rights and the eye of the state". As a lot of people are aware, we are not all equal in capabilities.
In highschool I realized I was too short to be a pro nba player. Does this make me unequal to them? In the aspect of basketball sure, in other things I might be better or worse.
As culturally, virtue has been a big moral indicator for the west. It is easy to tug on the virtue string: "you don't think women can play sports as good as men? Wow you bigot". I remember reading a thread here showing how women are only like 10 years behind men athletically.
Another thing to consider: your whole life you're told you are equal to the opposite gender. That you are just as capable (which you are) at achieving anything. Then later in life you see what you would consider contrary to that fact. It becomes difficult to understand.
But we are all equal, why is there a discrepancy. Certainly there is some foul play involved" when in reality it's just unequal in capabilities. Again though this just does not compute this is not what you were told your whole life.
Because this is contrary to their understanding of "everyone is equal" the reasoning behind it isn't "well men just tend to be more athletic than women and more interested in sports/physical competition" it becomes "sexism since clearly men don't want women in sports"
We humans have an insatiable need to have an explanation for the reality we view.
To preface as this can be a sensitive topic: Everyone is equal in the scope of rights and gov, however humans are not interchangeable. My boss is a woman and she is superior to me in so many ways, I aspire to be as good as her at what we do
Equality in the west was a slow start and one of the first instances was in France late 1600s/early 1700s when a soldier was elevated to noble status (I could be wrong on the timeline please forgive me).
The seed has now been planted
As democracy bloomed and equal rights started taking precedent, we as a society fought for equal rights across the board (women vs men, black vs white). A lot of these things are typically pushed by NGOs and organized social groups.
As these things were achieved you're left with NGOs having the option to say "jobs done let's shut the door" or keep their doors open and push for more. To do this you have to find "inequality" else where.
When you take the cultural norm of "we are all equal" this is actually intended to be as "we are all equal in rights and the eye of the state". As a lot of people are aware, we are not all equal in capabilities.
In highschool I realized I was too short to be a pro nba player. Does this make me unequal to them? In the aspect of basketball sure, in other things I might be better or worse.
As culturally, virtue has been a big moral indicator for the west. It is easy to tug on the virtue string: "you don't think women can play sports as good as men? Wow you bigot". I remember reading a thread here showing how women are only like 10 years behind men athletically.
Another thing to consider: your whole life you're told you are equal to the opposite gender. That you are just as capable (which you are) at achieving anything. Then later in life you see what you would consider contrary to that fact. It becomes difficult to understand.
But we are all equal, why is there a discrepancy. Certainly there is some foul play involved" when in reality it's just unequal in capabilities. Again though this just does not compute this is not what you were told your whole life.
Because this is contrary to their understanding of "everyone is equal" the reasoning behind it isn't "well men just tend to be more athletic than women and more interested in sports/physical competition" it becomes "sexism since clearly men don't want women in sports"
We humans have an insatiable need to have an explanation for the reality we view.
@AL sama
Watch this from 5:30 (just white bathy clip not complete video)
3 complete strangers went into a bathy separately and all 3 noticed something. It's get weirder with the 3rd party. And, mind you they all are just vloggers and not ghost believers.
And, explain to me what really happened or how it happened what 3rd party witnessed
@AL sama
Watch this from 5:30 (just white bathy clip not complete video)
3 complete strangers went into a bathy separately and all 3 noticed something. It's get weirder with the 3rd party. And, mind you they all are just vloggers and not ghost believers.
And, explain to me what really happened or how it happened what 3rd party witnessed
True one could argue this is pretty much the revival of cold war conflict
War is endless without a just political solution
Even if the War ends, The West will make Sure Russia occupation of Ukranian lands is incredibly expensive and challenging by funding insurgencies and instability which the long term motive is to force Russia to withdraw
Which one West prefer?
International and possible nuclear war against Russia or endless war limited to Southern and Eastern Ukraine to drain Russia?
Well the answer is clear
War is endless without a just political solution
Even if the War ends, The West will make Sure Russia occupation of Ukranian lands is incredibly expensive and challenging by funding insurgencies and instability which the long term motive is to force Russia to withdraw
Which one West prefer?
International and possible nuclear war against Russia or endless war limited to Southern and Eastern Ukraine to drain Russia?
Well the answer is clear