CoC: Color of Clowns

Kuma and Ginny #1 Forever


These freaky ass cultists always have the shit-eating grin bullies in school used to have, before they went back to their miserable home lives.

You know, a lot of this really just boils down to that:

These are miserable people that like bullying others to distract themselves from their own misery.

To them, the entire world is a barrel, and everyone else is crabs.

Can't find most US states on a map the way they can't find the clitoris.
 

Yeah, but BEFORE you trust a sources, how do you make sure you can trust them?

Let's say I gave you a scientific paper. What will make you trust it or not?


I don't care about his "jokes" but he shouldn't blatantly lie to his audience by portraying his murderer as a conservative maga.
It's good that the left is rediscovering the benefits of the first amendment, but to be credible, perhaps you should have denounced cancel culture much earlier.
Cancel culture was NEVER really a thing against the right wing. It's a moral panic because you guy can't stand taking responsibility for hurting people.

On the other hand, there is only state censorship here. Seems like you are okay with that.


Donnie’s administration is doing a fascism speed run, they have hit EVERY SINGLE ONE of these things and it hasn’t been nine full months since he took office…completely cooked country, I don’t know how we’ll ever recover from this xenophobic movement :crazwhat:


instead of blaming one side, lets actually combat aganist the evil in the world?
"Both side has done evil" completely denies the material reality of the world. Reality is more complex.

Let me politically translate what you just said:

"Instead of blaming the side that is perpetuating the violence, let's fight against a simplistic concept made for kids to understand that we shouldn't perpetuate violence"

It's not a both side scenario. There is one NON ethical side that lie, harm, hurt, willingly and another that TRIES to be ethical that try to prevent the other side from doing harm, when though violence if needed.

While there are indeed problems in the mode of action of the left, the problem relies in the danger of authoritarism first. But on the right, it's a completely different matter, the problem relies in the DIRECT VALUE SYSTEM. A value system that directly hurts people. A value system that is not shared only by the extremist of the right, but by the entire rightist spectrum to different degrees of power.
he was largely dismissed
The literal opposite happened. He got a front page everywhere. His candidacy was accepted BECAUSE it was seen and portrayed as joke.


you're also forgetting that trump would always talk shit about Hillary too so neither side is better than the other.
Let's stop looking at democrats and republican as "the two side". They are both on the conservative side.


@Logiko if you really mean everything you say then I have a challenge for you.

Convert tesla into a Left like you within 10 days.

Are you up for the challenge?
It will never be possible. It took me multiple YEARS to go from his point to where I'm at politically. And it was while completely being aware that I needed to change.

At best I think it's something possible in a few month IF (and only IF) he is REALLY willing to listen to me, which he is not. The more that I can do in 10 day is try to make him doubtfull of his own biases and belief. But again, it would require him to be open minded and not completely reject what I have to say like before.

But you know.. he is not really far from being a leftist, just like Van (but for different reasons). I guess you could even say that the only thing missing for Monster is the self-questionning. The acceptance of the fact that he has biases created by his material condition of existence.

Things like denying the reality of racism while being racialized himself is kind of a big denial in my opinion.

>>>>
Logiko has a larger ego than me and loves to make things more complicated than they need to be
Here for exemple, he a case of denial of reality. A documented reality that is labelled as "more complicated than they need to be".
It would be like me having that kind of discussion:

Me : "Oh! I get it, so gravity is attracting the object together"
A scientist : "It's actually a bit more complex than that, gravity distords spacetime which make object "fall"
Me: "you are making thing more complicated than they need to be"
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but BEFORE you trust a sources, how do you make sure you can trust them?

Let's say I gave you a scientific paper. What will make you trust it or not?



Cancel culture was NEVER really a thing against the right wing. It's a moral panic because you guy can't stand taking responsibility for hurting people.

On the other hand, there is only state censorship here. Seems like you are okay with that.







"Both side has done evil" completely denies the material reality of the world. Reality is more complex.

Let me politically translate what you just said:

"Instead of blaming the side that is perpetuating the violence, let's fight against a simplistic concept made for kids to understand that we shouldn't perpetuate violence"

It's not a both side scenario. There is one NON ethical side that lie, harm, hurt, willingly and another that TRIES to be ethical that try to prevent the other side from doing harm, when though violence if needed.

While there are indeed problems in the mode of action of the left, the problem relies in the danger of authoritarism first. But on the right, it's a completely different matter, the problem relies in the DIRECT VALUE SYSTEM. A value system that directly hurts people. A value system that is not shared only by the extremist of the right, but by the entire rightist spectrum to different degrees of power.

The literal opposite happened. He got a front page everywhere. His candidacy was accepted BECAUSE it was seen and portrayed as joke.



Let's stop looking at democrats and republican as "the two side". They are both on the conservative side.



It will never be possible. It took me multiple YEARS to go from his point to where I'm at politically. And it was while completely being aware that I needed to change.

At best I think it's something possible in a few month IF (and only IF) he is REALLY willing to listen to me, which he is not. The more that I can do in 10 day is try to make him doubtfull of his own biases and belief. But again, it would require him to be open minded and not completely reject what I have to say like before.

But you know.. he is not really far from being a leftist, just like Van (but for different reasons). I guess you could even say that the only thing missing for Monster is the self-questionning. The acceptance of the fact that he has biases created by his material condition of existence.

Things like denying the reality of racism while being racialized himself is kind of a big denial in my opinion.

>>>>

Here for exemple, he a case of denial of reality. A documented reality that is labelled as "more complicated than they need to be".
It would be like me having that kind of discussion:

Me : "Oh! I get it, so gravity is attracting the object together"
A scientist : "It's actually a bit more complex than that, gravity distords spacetime which make object "fall"
Me: "you are making thing more complicated than they need to be"
In this case I'm the scientist
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
Yeah, but BEFORE you trust a sources, how do you make sure you can trust them?

Let's say I gave you a scientific paper. What will make you trust it or not?



Cancel culture was NEVER really a thing against the right wing. It's a moral panic because you guy can't stand taking responsibility for hurting people.

On the other hand, there is only state censorship here. Seems like you are okay with that.







"Both side has done evil" completely denies the material reality of the world. Reality is more complex.

Let me politically translate what you just said:

"Instead of blaming the side that is perpetuating the violence, let's fight against a simplistic concept made for kids to understand that we shouldn't perpetuate violence"

It's not a both side scenario. There is one NON ethical side that lie, harm, hurt, willingly and another that TRIES to be ethical that try to prevent the other side from doing harm, when though violence if needed.

While there are indeed problems in the mode of action of the left, the problem relies in the danger of authoritarism first. But on the right, it's a completely different matter, the problem relies in the DIRECT VALUE SYSTEM. A value system that directly hurts people. A value system that is not shared only by the extremist of the right, but by the entire rightist spectrum to different degrees of power.

The literal opposite happened. He got a front page everywhere. His candidacy was accepted BECAUSE it was seen and portrayed as joke.



Let's stop looking at democrats and republican as "the two side". They are both on the conservative side.



It will never be possible. It took me multiple YEARS to go from his point to where I'm at politically. And it was while completely being aware that I needed to change.

At best I think it's something possible in a few month IF (and only IF) he is REALLY willing to listen to me, which he is not. The more that I can do in 10 day is try to make him doubtfull of his own biases and belief. But again, it would require him to be open minded and not completely reject what I have to say like before.

But you know.. he is not really far from being a leftist, just like Van (but for different reasons). I guess you could even say that the only thing missing for Monster is the self-questionning. The acceptance of the fact that he has biases created by his material condition of existence.

Things like denying the reality of racism while being racialized himself is kind of a big denial in my opinion.

>>>>

Here for exemple, he a case of denial of reality. A documented reality that is labelled as "more complicated than they need to be".
It would be like me having that kind of discussion:

Me : "Oh! I get it, so gravity is attracting the object together"
A scientist : "It's actually a bit more complex than that, gravity distords spacetime which make object "fall"
Me: "you are making thing more complicated than they need to be"
Well let me phrase it differently.

He's a bad, spoiled student. But a good teacher is one who can find ways to make even bad apples listen, learn and transform them.

And, don't you want another Leftist ally? He would come handy.
 


"KANAKY (a french colony) - Policemen in a civilian car shot down a Kanak - 7 dead since the beginning of the revolt"


Well let me phrase it differently.

He's a bad, spoiled student. But a good teacher is one who can find ways to make even bad apples listen, learn and transform them.

And, don't you want another Leftist ally? He would come handy.
A teacher is someone that talks to a room that listens and is not closed minded. That is not who I am here lol.

I would love for him to start become more left, just like I would love for you to do it too, but sadly, if you don't want to change or listen, I don't know how to change that.
 
Last edited:
Top