Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
The big bang being an explosion is literally how we teach kid about the phenomena or how dictionnaries explain it:
The point is to make you understand that basic definitions that you find in your earlier year of studies or basic dictionnary definition are not necessarily correct with what the reality is. As in this case, the Big Bang being an explosion is not "valid", it's a missconception of the reality of the event which was an expansion of spacetime and the entire universe, like a balloon, suddenly big full of air.
The comparison here should have made you understand that your knowledge of gender should be refering to the reality of gender and not a random definition you found on the internet explaining you that there were only two genders.
If you close up reality to dictionnaries (which are not made to give you knowledge but to give you basic contextual information about a word) you will end up completely missing the material reality of existence.
Giving a definition to someone instead of an argumentation, is a proof that we don't understand the essence of the concept and need to rely on a basic, restraining one sentence contextual definition to counter it. And it's often a bad definition.
As for the universe, there is no problem, you not understanding that knowledge does not have an impact on the word, but you refusing to question a basic definition you learned when you were a kid can have massive consequences for trans people if you hurt them.
The point is to make you understand how fascism rises, this is but one out of the thousands of news that I will now share.
Ini this case, it's not patriotism, it's subjegation and the beginning of authoritarism.
Only a one state solution can work. Partition are not a good idea and this will not change anything about the state of colonization or the appartheid currently taking place
The point is to make you understand that basic definitions that you find in your earlier year of studies or basic dictionnary definition are not necessarily correct with what the reality is. As in this case, the Big Bang being an explosion is not "valid", it's a missconception of the reality of the event which was an expansion of spacetime and the entire universe, like a balloon, suddenly big full of air.
The comparison here should have made you understand that your knowledge of gender should be refering to the reality of gender and not a random definition you found on the internet explaining you that there were only two genders.
If you close up reality to dictionnaries (which are not made to give you knowledge but to give you basic contextual information about a word) you will end up completely missing the material reality of existence.
Giving a definition to someone instead of an argumentation, is a proof that we don't understand the essence of the concept and need to rely on a basic, restraining one sentence contextual definition to counter it. And it's often a bad definition.
As for the universe, there is no problem, you not understanding that knowledge does not have an impact on the word, but you refusing to question a basic definition you learned when you were a kid can have massive consequences for trans people if you hurt them.
The point is to make you understand how fascism rises, this is but one out of the thousands of news that I will now share.
Ini this case, it's not patriotism, it's subjegation and the beginning of authoritarism.
Only a one state solution can work. Partition are not a good idea and this will not change anything about the state of colonization or the appartheid currently taking place
Last edited:
You didn't provide any arguments Monster. Now when he is not here (I am assuming kurwa is banned from this thread) you take a moral high ground and act above arguing with a "user like him" (a troll, even though everyone here trolls everyone).
[automerge]1758472251[/automerge]
Pretty obvious left/right are not principally against cancel culture and censorship, as either side will censor each other as soon as they acquire media power. No "righty" or leftist actually values free speech or a free marketplace of ideas in principal.
[automerge]1758472301[/automerge]
Schizophrenia
[automerge]1758472251[/automerge]
Pretty obvious left/right are not principally against cancel culture and censorship, as either side will censor each other as soon as they acquire media power. No "righty" or leftist actually values free speech or a free marketplace of ideas in principal.
[automerge]1758472301[/automerge]
I love how people think here that I'm rigidly stuck in a belief simply because I do not want to stop questionning their rethoric.. It's very interesting socially speaking. But being open to change does not necessarily mean starting to agree with everyone or even aknowledging the legitimacy of their words.
My conviction is just an illusion that makes you think that I'm a rock in my belief system, when in reality, I've changed my vision and values a LOT since I came here.
Yup, it's not about winning, it't about politicizing. Something that is not a competition, but a necessity under the rise of fascism.
I do let people shape my beliefs.
ALL THE FUCKING TIME.
> In fact, no late that yersterday, I listened to a 16yo activist. This allowed me to understand and prevent myself from developing a major bias toward the fights of younger politicized people.
> Just a mear week ago - as I explained earlier - I listened to an activist explaining how anti-asian racism and specifically the cases of North Korea and China were overused under the colonial ombrellas of antifascism for no reasonnable reasons other than making shamefull comparison to "shamefull" countries when they are really not worse that what is happening at the moment in the western world.
> A few week before that, I learned about the horrors of racism linked with gentrification and completely changed my vision of the way I apprehend noise in the public space.
I have hundreds of exemple like that in this year alone. Btw... did you noticed that I'm using swear words now ? I did that after multiple people convinced me of the futility of keeping my vocabulary safe in front of people who want me dead. If I said "I will never let anyone mold my thought and beliefs" when I was a conspiracy theorist and borderline reactionnary.. I would have NEVER become a leftist.
My reactance in front of your guyz's rethorics and the biases that you guys have created in response are completely preventing you from looking at the actual nature of the person that is talking to you right now. A person that is literally defined by change and the idea that listening to people and allowing them to change who you are is one of the best quality one can have.
And if you don't understand what I'm saying here. I suggest you look at my messages that were adressed to this thread before and after Blax entered the discussion.
"Think beyond" does not only means thinks "something else" or think beyond "what you believe about the world while being careful of your biases".
It literally means.. "think beyond" the image that I project.
My biggest rightist belief is this:
I can abandon the idea that we must keep talking to rightist and reactionnaries to convince them in - and only in - closed spaces like this one or in a family gatherin for ex.
Many radical leftists would laugh or ridiculize me for doing what I'm doing here. But I just can't give up on this idea. I was like them, so if I changed, this means that everyone has that same potential.
My conviction is just an illusion that makes you think that I'm a rock in my belief system, when in reality, I've changed my vision and values a LOT since I came here.
Yup, it's not about winning, it't about politicizing. Something that is not a competition, but a necessity under the rise of fascism.
I do let people shape my beliefs.
ALL THE FUCKING TIME.
> In fact, no late that yersterday, I listened to a 16yo activist. This allowed me to understand and prevent myself from developing a major bias toward the fights of younger politicized people.
> Just a mear week ago - as I explained earlier - I listened to an activist explaining how anti-asian racism and specifically the cases of North Korea and China were overused under the colonial ombrellas of antifascism for no reasonnable reasons other than making shamefull comparison to "shamefull" countries when they are really not worse that what is happening at the moment in the western world.
> A few week before that, I learned about the horrors of racism linked with gentrification and completely changed my vision of the way I apprehend noise in the public space.
I have hundreds of exemple like that in this year alone. Btw... did you noticed that I'm using swear words now ? I did that after multiple people convinced me of the futility of keeping my vocabulary safe in front of people who want me dead. If I said "I will never let anyone mold my thought and beliefs" when I was a conspiracy theorist and borderline reactionnary.. I would have NEVER become a leftist.
My reactance in front of your guyz's rethorics and the biases that you guys have created in response are completely preventing you from looking at the actual nature of the person that is talking to you right now. A person that is literally defined by change and the idea that listening to people and allowing them to change who you are is one of the best quality one can have.
And if you don't understand what I'm saying here. I suggest you look at my messages that were adressed to this thread before and after Blax entered the discussion.
"Think beyond" does not only means thinks "something else" or think beyond "what you believe about the world while being careful of your biases".
It literally means.. "think beyond" the image that I project.
My biggest rightist belief is this:
I can abandon the idea that we must keep talking to rightist and reactionnaries to convince them in - and only in - closed spaces like this one or in a family gatherin for ex.
Many radical leftists would laugh or ridiculize me for doing what I'm doing here. But I just can't give up on this idea. I was like them, so if I changed, this means that everyone has that same potential.
Last edited:
Baldy dysmorphia is a serious subject but no one ever mentions it. Let’s agree to fund research with public money and give a ticket to Turkey to every baldies in the meantime 
Bald-phobia ENDS NOW !
Bald-phobia ENDS NOW !
Someone I know felt insecure about a bald spot they have, and I asked them if they knew whether another person, who they have known for decades, has a bald spot or not, and they said they didn't know, so they didn't even care to notice that over decades in someone else close to them but they were insecure about it in their case
Being bald doesn't matter
[automerge]1758483353[/automerge]
Nah, I'll pass. But good luck with that!
Like I told you a few month back, I don't wanna do anything here more than I'm already doing. Unless I have a spark of stupidity that makes me do dumb shit like the video I did. But that's only exceptionnal and personnal.
I don't want to involve myself out of what I'm capable of. And I'm not capable of much at the moment.
Like I told you a few month back, I don't wanna do anything here more than I'm already doing. Unless I have a spark of stupidity that makes me do dumb shit like the video I did. But that's only exceptionnal and personnal.
I don't want to involve myself out of what I'm capable of. And I'm not capable of much at the moment.
It's alrighty, but would you be interested in seeing how they turn out?
The big bang being an explosion is literally how we teach kid about the phenomena or how dictionnaries explain it:
The point is to make you understand that basic definitions that you find in your earlier year of studies or basic dictionnary definition are not necessarily correct with what the reality is. As in this case, the Big Bang being an explosion is not "valid", it's a missconception of the reality of the event which was an expansion of spacetime and the entire universe, like a balloon, suddenly big full of air.
The comparison here should have made you understand that your knowledge of gender should be refering to the reality of gender and not a random definition you found on the internet explaining you that there were only two genders.
If you close up reality to dictionnaries (which are not made to give you knowledge but to give you basic contextual information about a word) you will end up completely missing the material reality of existence.
Giving a definition to someone instead of an argumentation, is a proof that we don't understand the essence of the concept and need to rely on a basic, restraining one sentence contextual definition to counter it. And it's often a bad definition.
As for the universe, there is no problem, you not understanding that knowledge does not have an impact on the word, but you refusing to question a basic definition you learned when you were a kid can have massive consequences for trans people if you hurt them.
The point is to make you understand that basic definitions that you find in your earlier year of studies or basic dictionnary definition are not necessarily correct with what the reality is. As in this case, the Big Bang being an explosion is not "valid", it's a missconception of the reality of the event which was an expansion of spacetime and the entire universe, like a balloon, suddenly big full of air.
The comparison here should have made you understand that your knowledge of gender should be refering to the reality of gender and not a random definition you found on the internet explaining you that there were only two genders.
If you close up reality to dictionnaries (which are not made to give you knowledge but to give you basic contextual information about a word) you will end up completely missing the material reality of existence.
Giving a definition to someone instead of an argumentation, is a proof that we don't understand the essence of the concept and need to rely on a basic, restraining one sentence contextual definition to counter it. And it's often a bad definition.
As for the universe, there is no problem, you not understanding that knowledge does not have an impact on the word, but you refusing to question a basic definition you learned when you were a kid can have massive consequences for trans people if you hurt them.
i disagree with the bolded part. if it does hurt them, thats too bad, but its asinine to police basic speech to cater to the feelings of a minority within a minority.
and i already told you the easy solution for people who dont want to adapt to gender based definitions already as well, just use "male" and "female" and stop using "man" and "woman" if ideologues like you make using them in the intended way hate speech.
[automerge]1758483991[/automerge]
maybe they need a british mandate again
TW : Horrific scene.
Here is a twitter research sentence for you to look at what Israel just did to a family in Lebanon
I'm definitely not against that
Sure, post them here if you want :)
Don't talk about science or rationnality then. You are using basic fucking terms to describe expansive scientific observations. (yes, gender studies are a discipline of social sciences, sorry if you don't like that)
If you are ok being a dick and not caring when people are hurt, go for it. But don't be mad when I remind you of your rethoric. You can't have it both ways.
Learn about transidentity, learn about heteronormativity, learn about gender, because right now, I fell like I'm talking to a young person that think they know everything about a subject, when they are not even understanding the basics.
Here is a twitter research sentence for you to look at what Israel just did to a family in Lebanon
Type exactly: "This is what the filthy Zionists did to the children."
I'm definitely not against that
Sure, post them here if you want :)
Don't talk about science or rationnality then. You are using basic fucking terms to describe expansive scientific observations. (yes, gender studies are a discipline of social sciences, sorry if you don't like that)
If you are ok being a dick and not caring when people are hurt, go for it. But don't be mad when I remind you of your rethoric. You can't have it both ways.
Learn about transidentity, learn about heteronormativity, learn about gender, because right now, I fell like I'm talking to a young person that think they know everything about a subject, when they are not even understanding the basics.
Last edited:
And its not mandatory to use these basic fucking terms the exact way you want them to be used. fuck off, your bracket is irrelevant and i think you are mistaking me for someone who is against social sciences, cause im not.
well yeah i dont shape my speech in accordance with the feelings of every random person around. that doesnt mean i dont care if they are hurt or that im not willing to engage in conversation about it. and i had great conversations about this topic with lesbian and pansexual friends of mine. :shrug:
been there, done that. thats a significant part of educational sciences in germany since around 2014.
well yeah i dont shape my speech in accordance with the feelings of every random person around. that doesnt mean i dont care if they are hurt or that im not willing to engage in conversation about it. and i had great conversations about this topic with lesbian and pansexual friends of mine. :shrug:
been there, done that. thats a significant part of educational sciences in germany since around 2014.
THere is not only thing to do to stop divisions in society. Taking out nations would just be a big one of them.
It's mendatory because they are here to prevent oppressions to spread too fast Einstein and hurting people. If you can't understand that there is no discussion possible with you.
You have absolutely no rationnal reason to keep using those words unless you have a reactionnary agenda.
We are talking about trans people and gender identity here, not lesbians or pansexuals.
If you care about not hurting people, then try not to hurt people by aknowledging the fact that they are hurt when you deny their legitimacy.
It doesn't show
It's mendatory because they are here to prevent oppressions to spread too fast Einstein and hurting people. If you can't understand that there is no discussion possible with you.
You have absolutely no rationnal reason to keep using those words unless you have a reactionnary agenda.
We are talking about trans people and gender identity here, not lesbians or pansexuals.
If you care about not hurting people, then try not to hurt people by aknowledging the fact that they are hurt when you deny their legitimacy.
It doesn't show
According to what I read, it's not vaccines. They'll announce they found a connection between autism and prenatal tylenol. So pregnant women (or pregnant birthing people so Logiko doesn't get mad at me), will be advised not to take tylenol unless it's a really extreme fever.
So basically the President of the United States is going to tell us Tylenol causes Autism, will be interesting to see the memes after work later lol
So basically the President of the United States is going to tell us Tylenol causes Autism, will be interesting to see the memes after work later lol