Which is a small price to pay for the freedom of black people.
Most people running their mouths about this topic claiming what he said isn't that bad haplen to be white right wingers just like Kirk who didn't really do research on how bad black people had it back then. If you had to go through what they went through you'd easily see why it's so important we have laws in place that help us avoid repeating things like slavery.
Your argument has now morphed into Kirk being racist for what he DIDN'T do

He DIDN'T do research on how bad blacks have it then and today
:rolaugh:

Actual racist or even right-winger you can just pull a clip of them saying DEI or CRT is anti-white, or that this country must remain majority white. Not any of this weak arguments shit

Kirk was a moderate on race, his complaint against DEI amounted to wanting a colorblind meritocracy, it had nothing to do with him seeing race or ethnicity as a central factor in how society should be organized. He dismissed such ideas and considered DEI a form of racism but for blacks
 

Jew D. Boy

I Can Go Lower
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1nofdhu
The Republicans are using Pokemon to kidnap children.

Can't even make this shit up, what evil losers.
My coworker just showed me this; these fucking nutjobs think they’re so clever, as though raiding tattoo parlors to the tune of an anime theme song is some grandiose display of superiority…I’m comforted by the thought of all these complicit cunts burning in Hell when they die :ihaha:
[automerge]1758638154[/automerge]
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/23/...ytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
Speaking of pedophiles…like father, like son!!
 
He is against DEI because it gives an unfair advantage to blacks which implies he doesn't feel they need it, AKA they are equally as capable as whites, something no Nazi would ever even consider.
:risitavirus:
There wouldn't need an advantage for black people if there wasn't already an unfair advantage for white people.

:goyea:


Sure let's ignore what the creators said and believe in what my communist journal says. Why bother having the direct source as a valid and credible one when you can have someone else delusional opinion instead?
I literally listenned to the video mate. He said a lot of biased and fallacious BS that have no basis in logic, rethoric or historical reality. This is a revionnist channel that focused on slop reactionnary videos. There is nothing worth keeping in his argumentary and you shouldn't take what he says as god's words.


Please don't. You are incapable of formulating a simple question. Stop pretending you are an intellectual. You are not. You just speak a bunch of nonsense.
My question is simple. Do not try to gaslight me you will just look ridiculous. ANswer it or ignore it but don't try to twirl your way out like that it's useless.

I gave you a clear answer and a clear question. If you are not ok with the content, do say so.

No he wasn't. He was against DEI believing it gave blacks an advantage which implies without it they would be equally capable as white something he has stated many times over the years.

He encouraged blacks, even LGBT+ blacks like Rob Smith, to join Republicans and publically defended them
You were never on the right if you think Charlie fucking Kirk was anything close to a Nazi or RW extremist. LOL
He was racist, that's a fact.

The fact of thinking that DEI gives an unfair advantage IS a racist stance as it denies systemic racism to begin with to attack black people in return. As for LGBTQI+ he was a bigot too explaining how the bible was sayin gay should be stoned to death.

DO not even start defending this fascist or we will have a problem. The guy was a white supremacist. Stop your propaganda right now.


He believed in meritocracy
Which is capitalist BS and a myth and in this case a tool for white supremacy.

No idgaf. You have no proof he is a racist and are clearly brainwashed
THe guy literally explained that situation of black people was better under segregation than it is right now, STOP defending this fucking NAZI FFS


Man it's crazy you could watch the clip over and over again to analyze it like that. Not an insult either, I'm just saying you must have seen some real fucked shit to be able to do that over and over like that without flinching.
The clip is a bit surprising the first time but it's not really that bad compared to what we can see at the moment in the world..
 
I literally listenned to the video mate. He said a lot of biased and fallacious BS that have no basis in logic, rethoric or historical reality. This is a revionnist channel that focused on slop reactionnary videos. There is nothing worth keeping in his argumentary and you shouldn't take what he says as god's words.
"Bla bla bla I refuse his arguments because I can't argue with logic"
My question is simple. Do not try to gaslight me you will just look ridiculous. ANswer it or ignore it but don't try to twirl your way out like that it's useless.

I gave you a clear answer and a clear question. If you are not ok with the content, do say so.
Dude I'm not gaslighting you and your question is not simple. You want my opinion if the article quoted right the theory or if the theory quoted is right?

You just have to say "Tell me if you believe the article quoted right the theory" or "Tell me if you believe the theory is right" is that simple. And yet I know you will not do that and will add a bunch of nothing just to sound intellectual and not be precipice about what you are asking
[automerge]1758645183[/automerge]
Now if only ICE was actually good at it's job. Even Obama had better deportation numbers!
Obama had the legal pass to deport illegals. Trump doesn't. That's why Obama is not racist.
 
There wouldn't need an advantage for black people if there wasn't already an unfair advantage for white people.

:goyea:


I literally listenned to the video mate. He said a lot of biased and fallacious BS that have no basis in logic, rethoric or historical reality. This is a revionnist channel that focused on slop reactionnary videos. There is nothing worth keeping in his argumentary and you shouldn't take what he says as god's words.


My question is simple. Do not try to gaslight me you will just look ridiculous. ANswer it or ignore it but don't try to twirl your way out like that it's useless.

I gave you a clear answer and a clear question. If you are not ok with the content, do say so.
I'm not really arguing for/against DEI here. The question is if Kirk is a racist because he is against DEI, I would argue no he isn't and the nature of his arguments comes from a position that every race is innately capable.

The fact of thinking that DEI gives an unfair advantage IS a racist stance as it denies systemic racism to begin with to attack black people in return. As for LGBTQI+ he was a bigot too explaining how the bible was sayin gay should be stoned to death.
Well we can define these things.

Seeing as you probably do not have a coherent definition for "racist", I will just define racism = someone who hates other races

No, denying that blacks are entitled to special selection in university for example, =/= hating black people. Lol

As for LGBTQI+ he was a bigot too explaining how the bible was sayin gay should be stoned to death.
He didn't say he thinks gays should be stoned to death. He welcomed gays, including gay black men, into TPUSA and publically allied with them.


The guy was a white supremacist. Stop your propaganda right now.
Trump is Darth Vader, Vance is Hitler, Kirk is Goebbels, and the ANTIFA is The Avengers
:milaugh::milaugh::milaugh:


Which is capitalist BS and a myth and in this case a tool for white supremacy.
Meritocracy is, by definition, race-blind

ns from Oxford Languages · Learn more

mer·i·toc·ra·cy
/ˌmerəˈtäkrəsē/
noun
  1. government or the holding of power by people selected on the basis of their ability.


 
And now, you think being against DEI means being a racist and that Kirk (who holds average conservative beliefs) is racist
:milaugh:
How dare you to claim treating everyone equally is not racist instead of treating the subraces (aka other ethnicities because human race is the only one we are talking about) as inferior and therefore they need special treatment?

😤
[automerge]1758645910[/automerge]
What made me go straight to far left was the argument that wage labour is exploitation, have you heard of it?
I have no idea what is that but I hope you know minimal wage is a racist law.
[automerge]1758646013[/automerge]
I think he's racist because of what he said about black women and the civil rights act, meritocracy is not capitalism, even if you think meritocracy can exist, because capitalism gives takes away from workers the value that they produce, and accumulates it into the wealth of the owners of capital
Workers are not giving away from what they produce. Owners of capital you mean what?
[automerge]1758646145[/automerge]
In capitalism those who do no work have almost all of the wealth, their wealth coming from the production done by the workers they employ, and those who do all of the work have almost none of the wealth they produce

It is a capital-oriented mode of production, whoever has the most capital gets the most wealth
Explain to me why people are working for someone who doesn't work instead of working for themselves and therefore becoming rich?

Do you guys even work? Dude I work in a small company and I guarantee you my boss is the hardest worker of it. He works every fucking day at least 12 hours a day on week days.
[automerge]1758646237[/automerge]
No idgaf. You have no proof he is a racist and are clearly brainwashed

America does not have a mainstream "right wing" at all. Sorry, being against basic things like feminism or DEI barely cut it. From the actual right wing's perspective in America which is dissident, not mainstream like TPUSA and PragerU, Kirk was too race-blind especially when he was pro-legal migration from countries like third world non-white countries if it benefitted the economy
By the way Trump, Elon and that murdered president son (forgot his name) were all Democrats not long ago. Specially the latter.
[automerge]1758646462[/automerge]
I used to think you were some old guy like Toby in your 30s-40s, now I know after reading this you're actually more like 12 or 13
30s is not old.

😡
 
Last edited:
Which is a small price to pay for the freedom of black people.
Most people running their mouths about this topic claiming what he said isn't that bad haplen to be white right wingers just like Kirk who didn't really do research on how bad black people had it back then. If you had to go through what they went through you'd easily see why it's so important we have laws in place that help us avoid repeating things like slavery.
Laws is exactly what made slavery possible though. Governament as a whole.
[automerge]1758646743[/automerge]
pseudoscientific as racism
Bruh
 
Meritocracy is as much pseudoscientific as racism and this has always been the case. It was more niche to think so thousands of years ago but there has always been people who knew that.
Yeah but it's not racism.

Unless putting two races on the same playing field with the same opportunities is "racist". I would think any actual racist or race-realist would prefer the perceived enemy/inferior race as oppressed or excluded entirely
 
Your argument has now morphed into Kirk being racist for what he DIDN'T do

He DIDN'T do research on how bad blacks have it then and today
:rolaugh:

Actual racist or even right-winger you can just pull a clip of them saying DEI or CRT is anti-white, or that this country must remain majority white. Not any of this weak arguments shit

Kirk was a moderate on race, his complaint against DEI amounted to wanting a colorblind meritocracy, it had nothing to do with him seeing race or ethnicity as a central factor in how society should be organized. He dismissed such ideas and considered DEI a form of racism but for blacks
look up the great replacement theory lol
this is a running theme with kirk
[automerge]1758646820[/automerge]
Laws is exactly what made slavery possible though. Governament as a whole.
[automerge]1758646743[/automerge]

Bruh
So?
 
https://x.com/GlobeEyeNews/status/1970174928201949362


This is down right INSANE

how the hell can you even sanction the world's criminal court for doing what it should be doing.

How do you even end up electing such morons in the first place.. Its 2 genocidal pedos in a row now.
Deserved. And so as UN. They do nothing they are supposed to yet help criminals to get away with their crimes.
[automerge]1758647517[/automerge]
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1nofdhu
The Republicans are using Pokemon to kidnap children.

Can't even make this shit up, what evil losers.
Any reason you don't give us the source link but reddit one?
[automerge]1758647592[/automerge]
Speaking of pedophiles…like father, like son!!
Anyone can accusr anyone. This just proves you live in a free country
 
Charlie Kirk promoted legal migration into America from the third world in large numbers (as long as it's economic), and promoting that the Conservative Movement should embrace gays.

Charlie Kirk promoted third-world migration
He did not believe in limiting visas for the skilled/educated and that people from India, China, etc. should be eligible for green-cards in America if they acquire a 2-year degree
10:09

Charlie Kirk was so homophobic, he promoted gays in Conservatism
Quite contrary to wanting them stoned, Charlie Kirk says some of his "closest friends" were gay and that the conservative movement should embrace "talented people that also happen to be gay"
13:18


He lived and died towing the line, never going beyond culture war discussion, his organization was a dam preventing common-sense, conservative youth in America from becoming truly right-wing.
 
Charlie Kirk promoted legal migration into America from the third world in large numbers (as long as it's economic), and promoting that the Conservative Movement should embrace gays.

Charlie Kirk promoted third-world migration
He did not believe in limiting visas for the skilled/educated and that people from India, China, etc. should be eligible for green-cards in America if they acquire a 2-year degree
10:09

Charlie Kirk was so homophobic, he promoted gays in Conservatism
Quite contrary to wanting them stoned, Charlie Kirk says some of his "closest friends" were gay and that the conservative movement should embrace "talented people that also happen to be gay"
13:18


He lived and died towing the line, never going beyond culture war discussion, his organization was a dam preventing common-sense, conservative youth in America from becoming truly right-wing.
"I'm not racist, I have black friends!"
Infallible argument :risicheck::risisweat:
 
Top