I don't care for your dumb little hypotheticals about me having to save the world by killing a dude (which I would do, btw, one life gone for the lives of billions of others to stay is a small price to pay). They're not relevant to the topic at hand.
Thus proving that you would kill in another not necessarily ethical context.
People who beat their wife, or rape children, or mass murder people, or whatever else, they aren't humans. Maybe they are humans in a literal sense, but from a psychological/emotional standpoint, they aren't.
So you are still seeing yourself out of the scale then.
I'm very clearly talking from a moral standpoint anyway. I don't view them as "humans" from a morals standpoint.
And morality is not viable to understand the world.
Ethics are much better as they take contextual matter into account.
They don't have the same logical tendencies as normal human beings, their brains are warped beyond repair.
It's crazy the ignorance of liberals sometimes...
Listen, be dumb if you want, I do not consider it my place to make this place evolve anymore. It's gonna crumble anyway.
Also, you shouldn't say slurs against trans people like that. I'm not calling you transphobic or anything,
Yeah, I could say T-Word. But in a toxic place where trans people are already excluded and where the word is invibilized, the chances are, noone will understand what it means. So using it to denounce its usage is a necessity to make it visible then push people to prevent its usage. But this is mainly a different of culture.
The problem of words are the usage as dehumanization method. Not the denunciation of those dehumanizations. That would be the level 0 of activism.
But I agree that you should use the word that you want. I've never been against a black person using the n-word here.
