Questions & Mysteries How did Mihawk make a black blade and Roger couldn't??
- Thread starter Karis koro
- Start date
F
Shusui - Made his attack stronger without trying to kill Zoro
Enma - made his attack stronger by bearly killing him.
I'll leave you as the judge of it , One is unbendable ,strongest Sword , other is Swords which kills you.
Though Enma has higher potential as Shusui curently is counted under 21 great swords and no room for improvement where as Enma can switch to 12 supreme grade swords after turning black.
Enma - made his attack stronger by bearly killing him.
I'll leave you as the judge of it , One is unbendable ,strongest Sword , other is Swords which kills you.
Though Enma has higher potential as Shusui curently is counted under 21 great swords and no room for improvement where as Enma can switch to 12 supreme grade swords after turning black.
It says "swordsman's skill" there.
Which has always been the case. Roger just isn't a graceful/skillful swordsman. He's a brute force type of swordsman. Same as current shanks
Which has always been the case. Roger just isn't a graceful/skillful swordsman. He's a brute force type of swordsman. Same as current shanks
It says "swordsman's skill" there.
Which has always been the case. Roger just isn't a graceful/skillful swordsman. He's a brute force type of swordsman. Same as current shanks
Which has always been the case. Roger just isn't a graceful/skillful swordsman. He's a brute force type of swordsman. Same as current shanks
Sword Skills + Haki (Mihawk)
Sword Skills + Haki (Rayleigh)
Sword Skills + Haki (Shanks)
Sword Skills + Haki (Roger)
Sword Skills + Haki (Oden)
0 difference in how they all fight, other than the style of swordplay. Only 1 of those forged a Black Blade, with the strongest sword to-date. Hint it wasn't Roger
Sword Skills + Haki (Zoro)
Sword Skills + Haki (Mihawk)
Sword Skills + Haki (Rayleigh)
Sword Skills + Haki (Shanks)
Sword Skills + Haki (Roger)
Sword Skills + Haki (Oden)
0 difference in how they all fight, other than the style of swordplay. Only 1 of those forged a Black Blade, with the strongest sword to-date. Hint it wasn't Roger
Sword Skills + Haki (Mihawk)
Sword Skills + Haki (Rayleigh)
Sword Skills + Haki (Shanks)
Sword Skills + Haki (Roger)
Sword Skills + Haki (Oden)
0 difference in how they all fight, other than the style of swordplay. Only 1 of those forged a Black Blade, with the strongest sword to-date. Hint it wasn't Roger
guess it’s not Mihawk
Wb (not the mf version) was canonically stronger than mihawk, kaido, shanks ecc even in his old days
Roger was as strong as wb in his prime, or, at worst, wb was a little stronger than roger, if we consider that he was called "the strongest" since the old era
Can u explain how roger could be weaker than them if he was basically as strong as prime wb?
Wb >= Roger > old wb>= top tiers is basically canon
Roger was as strong as wb in his prime, or, at worst, wb was a little stronger than roger, if we consider that he was called "the strongest" since the old era
Can u explain how roger could be weaker than them if he was basically as strong as prime wb?
Wb >= Roger > old wb>= top tiers is basically canon
Canonically? Did current Mihawk, Kaido or Shanks travel through time, fought and beat prime WB? None of the Shichibukai gave an actual shit during MF too. Not to forget Mihawk and WB never had an on-screen serious clash whatsoever.
The only thing that canonically ties Roger, Mihawk, Shanks and Prime WB together strength wise is that they all are top tier and Roger-WB was a close match.
Anything else, especially current vs past comparison is (currently) nothing but head canon.
The only thing that canonically ties Roger, Mihawk, Shanks and Prime WB together strength wise is that they all are top tier and Roger-WB was a close match.
Anything else, especially current vs past comparison is (currently) nothing but head canon.
There are only two facts, no head canon here
First
Wb was word strongest man even when he was old
He, very likely, was weaker than others top tiers only when he started to be sick
This means only one thing: no sick old wb (the strongest man) > prime mihawk, shanks, kaido ecc
Second
Roger was as strong as prime wb
Prime wb > old wb is only common sense
So roger was even stronger than the old version of wb who was stronger than all of them
But novels said that wb was called the strongest even in that era, so he was very likely stronger than roger by a little margin
This mean only one thing: prime wb >= prime roger > old wb >= mihawk, kaido, shanks ecc or old wb > mihawk, kaido, shanks ecc
In u can use even a little of logic, this is the only canonically outcome
The only headcanon here is how much wb and roger were stronger than them: extreme diff? high diff? mid diff? This isn't sure
U can call it headcanon
But the fact that they were stronger than them is canonically true
There is no problem with Mihawk being a bit stronger than Roger, by whatever margin of difference a black blade makes. Roger didn’t conquer the seas because he was the strongest in the first place, we are told WB was WSM not Roger. Roger conquered the seas because he was strong enough to compete with any top tier and charismatic enough to get other extremely powerful pirates to follow him.
Roger’s crew by the time he becomes PK had at least 4 Top Tiers: Roger, Rayleigh, Gabban, and Oden. Characters like WB or Mihawk being able to extreme diff Roger doesn’t matter when Roger’s crew would decimate theirs, or their lack their of in Mihawk’s case.
Roger’s crew by the time he becomes PK had at least 4 Top Tiers: Roger, Rayleigh, Gabban, and Oden. Characters like WB or Mihawk being able to extreme diff Roger doesn’t matter when Roger’s crew would decimate theirs, or their lack their of in Mihawk’s case.
