Questions & Mysteries If anybody can confirm these are real or not, we still dont know how Shanks fights
- Thread starter soheilhazrat
- Start date
- Tags mihawk>shanks
Just stop ... the number of head cannons and disingenuous statements are through the roof Shanks is swordsman through and through.
No fan fiction is going to change that.
His Captain was a swordsman who fought with a cutlass.
Rayleigh was a swordsman who fought with a Straight sword.
Oden fought with 2 Katanas.
Shanks fights with a Rapier since he's been a child unless you can provide the evidence we need to go with what's been shown.
No fan fiction is going to change that.
His Captain was a swordsman who fought with a cutlass.
Rayleigh was a swordsman who fought with a Straight sword.
Oden fought with 2 Katanas.
Shanks fights with a Rapier since he's been a child unless you can provide the evidence we need to go with what's been shown.
No, pretending Mihawk has better Haki than Shanks is copium.
If you're constantly even with the Strongest Man in the world and you also brought the world to its knees with just haki, what does that make you?
Or you know he was just always called Gol D Roger. The government tried to hide his D initial.
Pointless to generate headcannon that he had some mysterious title in the past. Speak of cannon material, not headcannon.
If you're constantly even with the Strongest Man in the world and you also brought the world to its knees with just haki, what does that make you?
Or you know he was just always called Gol D Roger. The government tried to hide his D initial.
Pointless to generate headcannon that he had some mysterious title in the past. Speak of cannon material, not headcannon.
That comparison makes a lot of sense when you realize a lot of strong people don't stick to particular style of combat and shanks is a very noteworthy person who uses a sword.
I would not reduce big mom to a swordsman just cause she carries a sword, clearly more versatile.
I would not reduce Kizaru to one cause he has a light sword.
king the wildfire certainly didn't want to be reduced to one either.
ask yourself why strength wasn't used there which would have put this argument to bed but some vague term called sword skills was used instead. ask yourself why the author would say we know he uses a sword but how exactly does he fight?
what would be his point in insinuating that, should be obvious no ?how he fights with a sword?
so until he has, it will be argued because shanks simply is the better portrayed character of the two.
I would not reduce big mom to a swordsman just cause she carries a sword, clearly more versatile.
I would not reduce Kizaru to one cause he has a light sword.
king the wildfire certainly didn't want to be reduced to one either.
ask yourself why strength wasn't used there which would have put this argument to bed but some vague term called sword skills was used instead. ask yourself why the author would say we know he uses a sword but how exactly does he fight?
what would be his point in insinuating that, should be obvious no ?how he fights with a sword?
so until he has, it will be argued because shanks simply is the better portrayed character of the two.
