[FNZ] Role Madness Jujutsu Kaisen Mafia - Shibuya Incident [Game Ended = Mafia + Traitor + Neutral Indie Won!]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because if I have a given fake claim, and then my role demonstrably doesn't work like my fake claim says it does, I'm pretty fucked aren't I?
Only if you got caught visiting me or someone else.

Broki’s fake wasn’t full proof either if you remember (it caught by night actions). It’s why she got caught
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
Only if you got caught visiting me or someone else.

Broki’s fake wasn’t full proof either if you remember (it caught by night actions). It’s why she got caught
Yes but look at the binding vow.
(Binding Vow Buff) Revealing One's Hand - If you truthfully reveal your fake claim's flavor + any part of its role in the Game Thread, even if vaguely or misleadingly, your Fully Grown form will be strengthened to now grant you a voting power of 2 and make you count as 2 players for parity purposes instead. Additionally, your next Factional Kill will be guaranteed to land on the target, bypassing any redirections, deflections, and/or bus drives.
Real^
(Binding Vow Buff) Revealing One's Hand - If you truthfully reveal your flavor + any part of your role in the Game Thread, even if vaguely or misleadingly, your Full Permission development will be strengthened to now grant you a voting power of 2.
^Fake

It's designed to be claimed in a way that can't be caught outright.
 
You're arguing both sides here - if you've been identified N1, why are you here Day 4? You have no reason to assume it was anything strategic at all actually, not sure why that's your first thought given everything else.
I was also protected that night (via town leader) so probably couldn’t kill me (which begs the question why target me at all, believe me I’ve asked myself)

Part of me wonders if they wanted to get a claim to confirm I have a passive to be disabled for role fishing.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
I was also protected that night (via town leader) so probably couldn’t kill me (which begs the question why target me at all, believe me I’ve asked myself)

Part of me wonders if they wanted to get a claim to confirm I have a passive to be disabled for role fishing.
So this comes back to yet again assuming incompetence.
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
Then how did Conq catch her lol? (I barely skimmed her role lol)
I just assumed she made the kill.

In any case, my point is the role works roughly the same way. So if my ability is locked behind a binding vow, it'll still be locked, that way it can be faked. You're free to ISO my posts, you'll see no claim anywhere until Day 2 at the earliest, which Ekko told me didn't count. QED, the passive disabling can't be mine

So then the question becomes, do you think scum have two, or, which is the case, an I the town version
 
I just assumed she made the kill.

In any case, my point is the role works roughly the same way. So if my ability is locked behind a binding vow, it'll still be locked, that way it can be faked. You're free to ISO my posts, you'll see no claim anywhere until Day 2 at the earliest, which Ekko told me didn't count. QED, the passive disabling can't be mine

So then the question becomes, do you think scum have two, or, which is the case, an I the town version
Time to ISO anything that could even remotely be a hint lol.

If you didn’t do it then I think you’d be Town of course lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top