[FNZ] Role Madness Jujutsu Kaisen Mafia - Shibuya Incident [Game Ended = Mafia + Traitor + Neutral Indie Won!]

[Flower]

Me this game:

 

[Naomi]

Me this game:

unfortunately looks like the mysteries susu wants to remain evil atm.

 

[Flower]

Lol maybe he needs to turn me evil while I need to turn him good xD.

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Lol maybe he needs to turn me evil while I need to turn him good xD.

Well, you’ll doomed lol.

 

[Flower]

Well, you’ll doomed lol.

Would be hilarious kek.

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Would be hilarious kek.

You’ve played yourself

 

[Flower]

You’ve played yourself

Have mercy, Sukuna.

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Have mercy, Sukuna.

No​

 

[Dr_Professor83]

You will betray town and you will like it

 

[Flower]

You will betray town and you will like it

Jokes on you I actually would!

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Jokes on you I actually would!

Counting on it!

 

[Flower]

@Grammaton are you here? Do you have any thoughts?

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

You will betray town and you will like it

Jokes on you I actually would!

Counting on it!

 

[Dr_Professor83]

Fear not Reloaded. If there is one thing you can trust in this game of lies we call mafia, there is one thing I can promise you.

Flower nor I would ever betray Town

 

[Flower]

Dw It’s just shitposting.

Probably.

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

Fear not Reloaded. If there is one thing you can trust in this game of lies we call mafia, there is one thing I can promise you.

Flower nor I would ever betray Town

Dw It’s just shitposting.

Probably.

 

[Flower]

In all honesty, scum would be inting if they converted me. So I‘ll be fine .

 

[Flower]

Anyway, I‘m bored. Nobody‘s really here, so I‘m going to watch some Anime.

@Psylocke can you also give your thoughts please?

@Dr. Watson are you here?

See you later.

 

[MonochromeYoru]

I think Mitch claiming no binding vow is too risky for scum. It's implied that almost every role has it. Or at the very least, nothing about binding vows not being a universal mechanics. So claiming they don't have it is drawing unnecessary attention to themselves.

I don't think any scum would alter the fake claims provided to them. So, if it is a fake claim, it would have to be made by Ekko himself. Would he give a painted target as a fake role to someone?

 

[Dr_Professor83]

I think Mitch claiming no binding vow is too risky for scum. It's implied that almost every role has it. Or at the very least, nothing about binding vows not being a universal mechanics. So claiming they don't have it is drawing unnecessary attention to themselves.

I don't think any scum would alter the fake claims provided to them. So, if it is a fake claim, it would have to be made by Ekko himself. Would he give a painted target as a fake role to someone?

I’ve considered this. And I agree that it’s a valid point.

Where elsewhere do you think we should go?