Versus Battle Kaido runs a One Punch Man gauntlet

Well if your argument is that affecting the surface of a planet is a planetary level feat then
Strawman, I never claimed any such thing.
Krakatoa causing a global volcanic winter
Huge exaggeration, it caused an insignificant short lived global cooling, not a volcanic winter lmfao.
temporarily fucking up the night sky globally
By launching a bunch of ash and shit into the sky, how would you like to compare that to a feat that isn't a volcanic eruption...?
it allegedly causing unusual waves in South Africa and the English Channel
Extremely minor disturbances like a boat being rocked slightly, not planetary fucking tsunamis, yet another false equivalence.
it causing a pressure wave circling the globe three and a half times;
An extremely minor pressure wave, the kind picked up by very precise instruments, not felt by people on the other side of the planet or the kind that causes global tremors and globally shakes buildings as the Mother Flame did.
all this should apparently put it at the lower end of a planetary level feat using the logic of "it affected the surface of the planet!"
No it doesn't, your post is nothing but a bunch of strawman arguments and false equivalences, you're arguing in complete bad faith and you know it.
As far as I'm concerned, simultaneously affecting the entire surface of a planet, a tiny fraction of a planet's actual mass, is not a planetary level feat. It's a multi continental level feat. Planetary level should either partially or entirely destroy the actual mass of a planet.
Creating tsunamis across the entire planet, earthquakes greater than any previously recorded across the entire planet and raising the entire planet's sea level is absolutely in the planetary range.
You want something that fucked up the surface of planet big time? Okay, K-Pg extinction event, the asteroid that killed the non-avian dinosaurs along with an estimated 75% of life. That is far more devastating than Mother Flame.

It left behind a crater 200 kilometers (120 miles) in diameter and 30 kilometers (19 miles) in depth.
This is interesting and all but a meteor impact is entirely different to what is being discussed here, there is no comparison to be made between them.
If a Dragon Ball character left a crater that big, would we call that sassenach planetary level?
Add this to the endless list of false equivalences and strawman arguments.
No, we feckin wouldn't because that is not what people are talking about when they talk about planetary level characters. They are talking about blokes destroying planets, not leaving big craters and affecting the weather.
That might be what you and the casuals are talking about, but it certainly isn't what I nor anyone with even a modicum of powerscaling knowledge are talking about.
Mother Frame left a small island sized crater and did some global earthquakes. That's not planetary.
Mother Flame increased the global sea level, caused high magnitude earthquakes around the planet along with tsunamis, that is absolutely planetary and high into it too.
 
I’m seeing posts saying “Kizaru is the fastest in the verse.” WHERE WAS THAT EVER STATED?

Kizaru was stopped by Shanks, anyone on a higher level can keep up with him.

Saying Kizaru is the fastest in the verse just because of the Pika Pika no Mi is the same as saying Burgess is the strongest in the verse lol, it even sounds a bit ridiculous.

Stop it, Orochi!
Post automatically merged:

Bro, the citizens of Wano didn’t even feel the shockwave, and Kaido was defeated right next to them lmfao

Os fãs do OP são realmente irremediavelmente burros, cara kkkkk
The King Kong Gun that hit Doffy in Dressrosa didn’t even touch the ground and still destroyed part of Dressrosa’s city…

Imagine thinking Bajrang Gun is only island-level lol.

We have to take into account the weight, the speed, and that it’s AdCoC—this thing would easily devastate a continent.
 
Last edited:
Strawman, I never claimed any such thing.

Huge exaggeration, it caused an insignificant short lived global cooling, not a volcanic winter lmfao.

By launching a bunch of ash and shit into the sky, how would you like to compare that to a feat that isn't a volcanic eruption...?

Extremely minor disturbances like a boat being rocked slightly, not planetary fucking tsunamis, yet another false equivalence.

An extremely minor pressure wave, the kind picked up by very precise instruments, not felt by people on the other side of the planet or the kind that causes global tremors and globally shakes buildings as the Mother Flame did.

No it doesn't, your post is nothing but a bunch of strawman arguments and false equivalences, you're arguing in complete bad faith and you know it.

Creating tsunamis across the entire planet, earthquakes greater than any previously recorded across the entire planet and raising the entire planet's sea level is absolutely in the planetary range.

This is interesting and all but a meteor impact is entirely different to what is being discussed here, there is no comparison to be made between them.

Add this to the endless list of false equivalences and strawman arguments.

That might be what you and the casuals are talking about, but it certainly isn't what I nor anyone with even a modicum of powerscaling knowledge are talking about.

Mother Flame increased the global sea level, caused high magnitude earthquakes around the planet along with tsunamis, that is absolutely planetary and high into it too.
"False equivalency! False Equivalency! FaLsE eQuIvAleNcy!!!"

I dunno mate. As far as I can see, I'm comparing three big arse explosions that all affected just the crust of a planet to varying degrees but hey, maybe what I ought to do is make a far simpler analogy for you to potentially comprehend.

Do you know what percentage of the Earth the crust consists of?

It comprises less than 1% of the planet's radius and volume.

Less than 1%....

If I take a sledgehammer to a building and knock out a few bricks, less than 1% of the building, does that make me building level?

If your answer is no then you should be able to comprehend why I think affecting (not even destroying, merely affecting) less than 1% of a planet isn't a feckin planetary level feat.
 
"False equivalency! False Equivalency! FaLsE eQuIvAleNcy!!!"
If you didn't keep making them then I wouldn't keep mentioning it:kayneshrug:
I dunno mate. As far as I can see, I'm comparing three big arse explosions that all affected just the crust of a planet to varying degrees but hey, maybe what I ought to do is make a far simpler analogy for you to potentially comprehend.
Key point being the greatly understated "varying degrees". To create an analogy, you're essentially trying to equate the explosion caused by a stick of dynamite to the explosion caused by a nuclear bomb simply because they're both explosions, completely ignoring the sheer scale difference in the effects produced by them.

The effects created by the Mother Flame are orders of magnitude above anything you have presented, but you seem to think that the Krakatoa eruption producing tiny waves is equivalent to creating tsunamis across the entire planet, or that the slight seismic disturbances detected by equipment are comparable to powerful earthquakes occurring worldwide and causing vast destruction, see the issue yet?
Do you know what percentage of the Earth the crust consists of?

It comprises less than 1% of the planet's radius and volume.

Less than 1%....

If I take a sledgehammer to a building and knock out a few bricks, less than 1% of the building, does that make me building level?

If your answer is no then you should be able to comprehend why I think affecting (not even destroying, merely affecting) less than 1% of a planet isn't a feckin planetary level feat.
The problem here is that you seem to have this bizarre preconception that for a character to be planetary, they must destroy a planet in a big explosion or something. This couldn't be further from the truth, energy can be released in vastly different ways with vastly different results. For example, if a character were to move the Moon at 80km/s, that would require energy comparable to destroying a planet, even though the Moon has 80x less mass than Earth and the feat is nothing like destroying a planet, the same principle applies to the Mother Flame.
 
If you didn't keep making them then I wouldn't keep mentioning it:kayneshrug:

Key point being the greatly understated "varying degrees". To create an analogy, you're essentially trying to equate the explosion caused by a stick of dynamite to the explosion caused by a nuclear bomb simply because they're both explosions, completely ignoring the sheer scale difference in the effects produced by them.

The effects created by the Mother Flame are orders of magnitude above anything you have presented, but you seem to think that the Krakatoa eruption producing tiny waves is equivalent to creating tsunamis across the entire planet, or that the slight seismic disturbances detected by equipment are comparable to powerful earthquakes occurring worldwide and causing vast destruction, see the issue yet?

The problem here is that you seem to have this bizarre preconception that for a character to be planetary, they must destroy a planet in a big explosion or something. This couldn't be further from the truth, energy can be released in vastly different ways with vastly different results. For example, if a character were to move the Moon at 80km/s, that would require energy comparable to destroying a planet, even though the Moon has 80x less mass than Earth and the feat is nothing like destroying a planet, the same principle applies to the Mother Flame.
Ok so how is what Uranus did anywhere comparable to blowing up a planet in energy output?
 
Top