Yes, but who is relying on stats?
That Shou Mou's strength "knows no limits"?
Unequivocally, yes.
Unequivocally, yes.
This was the quote that was being discussed.
I am retreading Bayou, and apparently Shoumou was considered the strongest offensive power in all of Zhao-
Hara's use of hyperbole is staple of his writing and it can get silly. You should pretty much ignore the grandiose statements and flowery language for the most part because it rarely - if it ever has - aligns with what Hara shows us.
Debating whether Shou Mou was the strongest general Zhao could field at the time is missing the point. If you'll read again, I didn't contest claim.
Hara's use of hyperbole is staple of his writing and it can get silly. You should pretty much ignore the grandiose statements and flowery language for the most part because it rarely - if it ever has - aligns with what Hara shows us.
Shou Mou was strong, his strength just didn't live up to the hyperbole used to describe it. That goes for just about everyone in Kingdom. That's the point.
Again, not the point I was making.
I'm not speaking to Shou Mou's strength relative to Ou Ki or anyone else, or where he ranked among active Zhao generals at the time.
I'm only speaking to Hara's use of hyperbole. It's staple of his writing and because of that we should take every statement made, view given and opinion expressed with a generous pinch of salt.
Hara's use of hyperbole is staple of his writing and it can get silly. You should pretty much ignore the grandiose statements and flowery language for the most part because it rarely - if it ever has - aligns with what Hara shows us.
Shou Mou was strong, his strength just didn't live up to the hyperbole used to describe it. That goes for just about everyone in Kingdom. That's the point.
Again, not the point I was making.
I'm not speaking to Shou Mou's strength relative to Ou Ki or anyone else, or where he ranked among active Zhao generals at the time.
I'm only speaking to Hara's use of hyperbole. It's staple of his writing and because of that we should take every statement made, view given and opinion expressed with a generous pinch of salt.
You make a a general post that doesn't quote anyone but is made during a discussion that is happening, to go on about Hara's supposed inconsistent use of hyperbole (without initially providing any examples) and then when quoted by users who think you are talking about the statement that was being discussed, you say you actually meant a completely different statement to what everyone else was talking about to begin with?....
Is it any wonder folk are getting confused. Lol.