General & Others Next Straw Hat Crew Members and the Grand Fleet
- Thread starter Uncle Van
- Start date
- Tags #c4ng2g carrot fans are still losers carrot haters are real losers seethe at the rabbit carrot is doing nothing because she doesn't matter carrot will never join the straw hats carrot's story never even began cry about carrot everyone else in the verse neg diffs the bunny imagine thinking stussy won't join its over furry bros keep the bunny on zou nobody else needs her let it go furry bros momo is breeding yamato no character is less relevant than carrot oden larper fans can't read stussy > carrot & yamato stussy supremacy who will be the next nakama of the week? yamato always had a better chance than carrot yamato story is over
Exactly, you can't. Because each one of my pillars are storytelling facts that anyone can see in the story. My reasonning stands on those pillar. Therefore, my reasonning is not wrong, only my conclusion was.
I think you skipped a sceptical class or two my boi. But at least you tried.
Because you see padawan.. If we were talking about Gods, Big Foot or nessy on which we have no actual proof here... it would be indeed impossible to disprove the theory because its indeed impossible to prove a negative or in other word something that can't be disproven.
But the thing is dear padawan.. we are not talking about things that can't be disproven here. I have given precise and refutable evidences here that you can check by yourself with your little keyboard and mouse on TCB or VIZ. Meaning that all that is in the prediction model proposed on my blog can be actually be proven wrong.
The next time you want to play with the sceptic rethoric, be sure not to have an actual one in front of you.
I think you skipped a sceptical class or two my boi. But at least you tried.
Because you see padawan.. If we were talking about Gods, Big Foot or nessy on which we have no actual proof here... it would be indeed impossible to disprove the theory because its indeed impossible to prove a negative or in other word something that can't be disproven.
But the thing is dear padawan.. we are not talking about things that can't be disproven here. I have given precise and refutable evidences here that you can check by yourself with your little keyboard and mouse on TCB or VIZ. Meaning that all that is in the prediction model proposed on my blog can be actually be proven wrong.
The next time you want to play with the sceptic rethoric, be sure not to have an actual one in front of you.
Even a reddit midwit understands what "proving a negative " means not you tho but ok bro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
oh boi..Let me rephrase. The burden of proof was mine at the beginning of this conversation, the very beginning, meaning page 1 of this thread. When my claims was this one:
"All the strawhats share a set of parameters that we can use to predict a future strawhat."
In the meantimes, I PROVED that claim. Here on my blog
Meaning that I don't have the burden of proof anymore. Basic logic.
After that you said "you are wrong". Which is, in regards to my proofs, a extraordinary claim. Which means that we are in the reversal of the burden of proof. its now YOU who need to prove your claim.
YOU need to prove that my proof are non conclusive. Its easy, I've listed each proof at every point of the reasonning and the pillar mainly with chapter or citations. So you only need to prove that one parameters is actually not shared by the strawhat in every pillar given the parameters that I describe and you will have proven my reasonning wrong.
Now, do the job or stop saying that I'm wrong.
"I proved i'm right, therefore it's your burden to prove i'm wrong"
Ok bro, lol, and you actually think saying your pillars are wrong is an "extraordinary claim" lmao,
Jesus christ
Ok bro, lol, and you actually think saying your pillars are wrong is an "extraordinary claim" lmao,
Jesus christ
Its therefore indeed YOUR job now - because you now have the burden of proof - to disqualify those arguments.
And yes, the proofs being presented to you, saying that they are not here is an extraordinary claim :)
Again, basic logic that you have hard time understanding.
Last edited:
Give me a statistic in which everyone, who calls themselves "sceptic" has voiced their opinion that "[...] playing with numbers to confirm a theory is close to a complotist based mindset."
Before you post the result of that study in here, you need to use "I think, [...]" at the beginning of that sentence. Otherwise it sounds like a fact that you cannot prove and we wouldn't have that, right? 😉
Why is it a problem that you are attributing less weight to the Gorowase than me? It is a matter of subjectivity and no problem.
Why is it a bad way? If I come to the right conclusion (figuring out, who the 11th SHP is), than the way of how I do it worked well. Telling me that is a bad way now - even before we do not even know that my conclusion is wrong and Oda has not reveled the 11th member, yet - is not advisable. Because you cannot prove me wrong. And, if you are telling me otherwise, the next question, I would ask you is: Can you prove it to be wrong?
I hope you will find your own way in storytelling and anaöysing, because if you always immitate other's thinking, than you will never be better than them. By going about it the way you like you are creating your own place as a writer and analyst - this leaves you more freedom to try out different things.
Can I actually pick up a little angry strain hinted in between those lines? Because, people start to insult others, when they feel angry and cannot hold back their feelings. Calling my analysis "BS" would indicate that. What are you angry about?
Why is my analysis wrong, if I fit numbers into my theory?
Wait, is it automatically right, if I don't do it? 
(Just a joke - I hope you pick up, what I want to imply here.). ;)
And because of the confirmation bias, my analysis is doomed to be wrong from the beginning? I do not think so. Confirmation bias happens, but it can have big or little influence on the outcome. It heavily depends on the person, who is doing the analysis. And since you cannot look into my head and do not know me, you cannot ascertain that. Hence, you do not know how much that bias applies to me and that analysis of mine.
Again, this is dependable on the person, who is doing the analysis. Also, a trap is a contraption, you can walk around, if you notice it. You do not have to walk into it. 😉
And behind that "IF" of yours is an "if not". Meaning therefore you are undecided: https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/for...embers-and-the-grand-fleet.31999/post-4856739
Good, than we fit perfectly together, because I love analysing. I analyse first and you can draw your theories from it. Would actually be fun.
Before you post the result of that study in here, you need to use "I think, [...]" at the beginning of that sentence. Otherwise it sounds like a fact that you cannot prove and we wouldn't have that, right? 😉
Why is it a problem that you are attributing less weight to the Gorowase than me? It is a matter of subjectivity and no problem.
Why is it a bad way? If I come to the right conclusion (figuring out, who the 11th SHP is), than the way of how I do it worked well. Telling me that is a bad way now - even before we do not even know that my conclusion is wrong and Oda has not reveled the 11th member, yet - is not advisable. Because you cannot prove me wrong. And, if you are telling me otherwise, the next question, I would ask you is: Can you prove it to be wrong?
I hope you will find your own way in storytelling and anaöysing, because if you always immitate other's thinking, than you will never be better than them. By going about it the way you like you are creating your own place as a writer and analyst - this leaves you more freedom to try out different things.
Can I actually pick up a little angry strain hinted in between those lines? Because, people start to insult others, when they feel angry and cannot hold back their feelings. Calling my analysis "BS" would indicate that. What are you angry about?
Why is my analysis wrong, if I fit numbers into my theory?
Wait, is it automatically right, if I don't do it? (Just a joke - I hope you pick up, what I want to imply here.). ;)And because of the confirmation bias, my analysis is doomed to be wrong from the beginning? I do not think so. Confirmation bias happens, but it can have big or little influence on the outcome. It heavily depends on the person, who is doing the analysis. And since you cannot look into my head and do not know me, you cannot ascertain that. Hence, you do not know how much that bias applies to me and that analysis of mine.
Again, this is dependable on the person, who is doing the analysis. Also, a trap is a contraption, you can walk around, if you notice it. You do not have to walk into it. 😉
And behind that "IF" of yours is an "if not". Meaning therefore you are undecided: https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/for...embers-and-the-grand-fleet.31999/post-4856739
Good, than we fit perfectly together, because I love analysing. I analyse first and you can draw your theories from it. Would actually be fun.
