Versus Battle Omni man (invincible) vs S class heroes (OPM)
- Thread starter Bullet
- Start date
What kind of stupid logic is that?
One of Naruto's databooks described how Kurama's bijuu dama - not EOS Kurama btw - can destroy the planet although his strongest Bijuu Dama is Small Country Lv. at best.
So Kurama can blow up a planet with his Bijuu Dama too?
You see how flawed this logic is. Boros canonically can just destroy the surface of the planet with his ultimate finisher, deal with it.
No, nothing of that is true AND you know it.
Don't be disingenuous.
Based on what aside from NLF arguments?
Wrong.
If they can pressure and hurt Omniman, they are hardly fodders to some OPM characters.
Once again, your logic is flawed and thus it affects your powerscaling too.
That's a hyperbole.
Murata is not ONE.
Of course I can say that.
A character capable to dish out the force to wipe out entire planets can therefore wipe characters out too who cannot resist the force.
Put Luffy in front of Saiyan Saga Goku and the former gets vaporised too by the pure force of Goku's attacks. That's simple powerscaling.
BTW, NLF argument. We don't know Saitama's full power and thus, we compare him at his strongest shown stats with other characters. That's how it works.
One of Naruto's databooks described how Kurama's bijuu dama - not EOS Kurama btw - can destroy the planet although his strongest Bijuu Dama is Small Country Lv. at best.
So Kurama can blow up a planet with his Bijuu Dama too?
You see how flawed this logic is. Boros canonically can just destroy the surface of the planet with his ultimate finisher, deal with it.
No, nothing of that is true AND you know it.
Don't be disingenuous.
Based on what aside from NLF arguments?
Wrong.
If they can pressure and hurt Omniman, they are hardly fodders to some OPM characters.
Once again, your logic is flawed and thus it affects your powerscaling too.
That's a hyperbole.
Murata is not ONE.
Of course I can say that.
A character capable to dish out the force to wipe out entire planets can therefore wipe characters out too who cannot resist the force.
Put Luffy in front of Saiyan Saga Goku and the former gets vaporised too by the pure force of Goku's attacks. That's simple powerscaling.
BTW, NLF argument. We don't know Saitama's full power and thus, we compare him at his strongest shown stats with other characters. That's how it works.
I mean it's stated he conqueror planets and destroy them, so it isn't farfetched to say Boros was planet level or above that. They said his attack was Star Level destroying attack and the reason it didn't destory the earth was due to Saitama diverting it and it only harming the surface. If it hit into the ground, it would have destroy the Earth especially the core wouldn't take it. If he was Star Level and Saitama wasn't using full power and he wasn't an God Level threat, then it shows we haven't reach full power-scaling of where OPM can go to especially when God Level threats will come into the series or VERY strong Dragon Level one.
Pretty sure he is given wiki states his punches can be so powerful it can affect the planet and that still him holding him back. I wouldn't be surprise his full power is God Level or more. They won't say his true power of course, but we got idea of where it is heading given feats he has shown on his power while holding back.
Nah, not one we seen getting beaten by group of heroes who are at City Level at best or more than that, but none can destory a planet.
Post automatically merged:
Pretty sure he is given wiki states his punches can be so powerful it can affect the planet and that still him holding him back. I wouldn't be surprise his full power is God Level or more. They won't say his true power of course, but we got idea of where it is heading given feats he has shown on his power while holding back.
Post automatically merged:
Nah, not one we seen getting beaten by group of heroes who are at City Level at best or more than that, but none can destory a planet.
Why you comparing another series Databook to another one? They aren't made by same author. That's like me saying Deku could handle same stuff Naruto can given being inspired by series, but both are different works.
It is true. It is source within wikia on OPM. It states him on Star Level of power and haven't be changed on anything they stated about him.
What is NLF?
I mean they could beat some of characters, but S-Class and even A-Class depending or so could beat them as well Demon and Dragon threats too. Haven't shown anything they can withstand physical force that much especially some of them are more human's durability and abilities than more on powers.
And Saitama one-shot one that could destroy one of largest section of the it's area. They are supercontinent, but stated it could have wipe out a sector as big as a state too.
It is true. It is source within wikia on OPM. It states him on Star Level of power and haven't be changed on anything they stated about him.
What is NLF?
I mean they could beat some of characters, but S-Class and even A-Class depending or so could beat them as well Demon and Dragon threats too. Haven't shown anything they can withstand physical force that much especially some of them are more human's durability and abilities than more on powers.
Post automatically merged:
And Saitama one-shot one that could destroy one of largest section of the it's area. They are supercontinent, but stated it could have wipe out a sector as big as a state too.
Saitama using an unknown but very small amount of his true power clashes and overpowered an at least surface wiping (depending on version and translation) attack with his punch. Under ideal circumstances, Omni-man busted a planet with help of 2 others.
Considering even the weakest version of this feat left him without having used any meaningful exertion, Saitama is at minimum capable of destroying a planet. You can't really that say it's hyperbole when he is clearly capable of doing it and has just not shown it. It could only be hyperbole if there were any anti-feats for it which there aren't.
It's not an NLF argument when it can be reasonably deduced from evidence derived from shown feats and reliable statements. That's like saying that Benn Beckman is weaker than Chopper just because we haven't seen better feats from him.
Didn't he deflect it instead of destroying? I don't remember tbh.
Considering even the weakest version of this feat left him without having used any meaningful exertion, Saitama is at minimum capable of destroying a planet. You can't really that say it's hyperbole when he is clearly capable of doing it and has just not shown it. It could only be hyperbole if there were any anti-feats for it which there aren't.
It's not an NLF argument when it can be reasonably deduced from evidence derived from shown feats and reliable statements. That's like saying that Benn Beckman is weaker than Chopper just because we haven't seen better feats from him.
Didn't he deflect it instead of destroying? I don't remember tbh.
Last edited:
What proves he isn't when he didn't even face any meaningful exertion from stopping an attack that was at least multi-continental? lol. Boros said at the end that Saitama wasn't even serious during the fight. Saitama literally said himself that he has the ability to destroy Earth but no, 'That was just hyperbole because no way he's that strong'.
Good that most readers acknowledge his strength.
Good that most readers acknowledge his strength.
Nothing you said proves your point, conquering a planet does not make you a planet level. The Spaniards conquered Mexico and no one there was at the country level. Stop saying "They said star level", nobody said that.
Until he shows some planet level feat, obviously I can say that it is hyperbole
Post automatically merged:
Until he shows some planet level feat, obviously I can say that it is hyperbole