Isn't "Onigiri" a named attack from Zoro?
Why do I see people calling it a "basic attack"?
Dude used a named attack, with bandana on, and did close to nothing. A little bruise of a paper cut. Together with the attack of someone else.
Now this "its just a basic attack" thing? Lolwut? Where's the "ability to cut everything" people have been boasting that it was "ryou" already?
Literally couldnt do serious damage to Kaido. Literally have to steal other person's technique to cut fire.
Isnt "EVERYTHING" supposed to actually mean ">>>EVERY<<<thing"?
Or are you people gonna accept he never had ryou, and Oda just used a lot of retcon for CoA?
It's not like the character is less cooler. He IS on the roof, fighting yonkos. alone or not. That IS cool. But he is NOT the GODLIKE character some of you insist that he is. It's just that.
Kaido wounds are like Shank's. they might get hit a lot, but the only wounds that matter to Kaido, are the ones made by Oden, like the only wound that matters to shanks, its the one made by Blackbeard.
Kaido called Inu and Neko sulong forms strong as he did with Zoro and Killer.
Question, what happened to the first two again?
So you people need to chill and wait for the development of the fight until its conclusion. We have a few chapters to go, still. Maybe by the end of April we might have the answers we need. lol