The stakes are literally the same for every Alliance member.
I just explained the stakes between like Nami and Ulti are different
these two now have an ideological conflict now. Regarding ulti taking Nami refusing to denounce Luffy very personally
You are right that the general stakes are the same, but general stakes dont make fights. Why are Luffy and Zoro not fighting commanders? Because they were the focuses of dozens of chapters meant to build a personal beef againt Kaido himself.
What exists between Marco and King? Have they even said one word to each other? Like we dont even know if they hate each other. Hahaha... Like literally nothing
Its easy. Oda just has to give us ONE dialogue exchange that establishes any personal stake between them and we are done. It can even be dumb like
Marco: “Phoenix fire rules”
King: “I will show you why they call me WILDFIRE”
Done. Its dumb but it works. Marco is over confident about his fire abilities and king is jealous and wants to prove his wierd fire is better. Agaim, its dumb, BUT ITS SOMETHING
Im telling you, as of now, this is simply a stalling tactic. Hell, we’ve even seen stalling tactics that have better stakes than this. Remember Drake Zoro vs Apoo.
Apoo- Wants to live so he cant lose the antidote
Zoro- Wants the antidote so that he can help cure everyone and go to the roof
Drake- JUST HATES APOO
HAHAHAHA.... Do you see that last part? Its fuckin dumb. Drake just hates apoo. Oda didnt have to tell us this but he did. Because why not have actual stakes. Drake just hates apoo. Thats a direct personal stake Drake has in the fight. And with that dumb stake, Zoro Drake vs Apoo has way more stakes than King vs Marco, YET THAT ZORO FIGHT WAS STILL JUST STALLING