No, pretty straightforward statements.
Cool.
Yep, it´s not telling us, sure, you are pretending it does tell us though.
I am saying
1) Marco´s stamina loss can´t be solely attributed to King (which, if you are honest, you basically did, at least the statement "King clapped Marco, he is superior" literally implies that. )
2) Lack of significant injury on King can´t be used to diss Marco since that was never Marco´s aim. He counterattacked once after getting attacked by both of them since in that instance it was the logical thing to do to keep them busy. He never tried to make it a 1vs1.
King having more AP than Marco is apparent (the wing cut for example). But we have no idea how Marco´s regen + AP vs King´s AP and his durability would result in a straight fight, since it never happened.