Is Mihawk more powerful than Shanks?


  • Total voters
    423
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
So Mihawk is only>Shanks in skill, but will lose to Shanks in overall strength, despite Mihawk being the strongest swordsman. If that's the case, how did Zoro defeat his opponents? Only because of skill? Was Zoro still weaker than Kaku, Ryuma, King etc. overall? If not, how come it only applies to Mihawk-Shanks then?
Who is more skillful with a sword, Tashigi or Luffy?
 
It doesn't prove Mihawk was a high top tier, like mihawk wankers claimed.
Kaido, BM, and WB still have superior portrayal.
Kaido and WB, yes. Big Mom? Hell no lmao.

Kaido and WB have superior portrayal due to their titles. Whitebeard also has his status as Roger's equal. What the hell does Big Mom have over Mihawk?

Besides Roger, Whitebeard & Kaido...is there even anyone who has flat-out superior portrayal to Mihawk? Not similar portrayal, but superior.
 
So Mihawk is only>Shanks in skill, but will lose to Shanks in overall strength, despite Mihawk being the strongest swordsman. If that's the case, how did Zoro defeat his opponents? Only because of skill? Was Zoro still weaker than Kaku, Ryuma, King etc. overall? If not, how come it only applies to Mihawk-Shanks then?
Why underling the world "in skill" if Mihawk was stronger overall? Never happened when a character was told to be stronger than an other.
I guess why not just putting "superior to Red Hair" without adding in skill.
But of course you all can't think and guess why Oda choiced do add in skill in particular, right? Nothing is done at random, remember that, everything has a meaning , justlook through it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top