you're insinuating that they used Observation haki to gauge Shanks and Mihawk and deduced that Mihawk is more superior in swordsmanship?
this whole statement is completely and utterly vague... why aren power levels a thing if thats how its supposed to be
there has never been a case where this CoO is used practically in a 1v1 fight to measure skill +strength on top of that
thats absolutely baseless.. and even in Rayleigh's case he was alluding to the haki of other monsters on the island and compared luffy's flagrant inferiority of it to them...
its an assumption that cannot be substantiated to increase its likelihood coz never in OnePiece has CoO been used to determine superiority in skill and physical strength in a specific art style
- its based on the assumption that marines know everything even skills and outcomes of matches based off of CoO which is a rough estimate and vague (when its mostly used to just indicate if opponents are strong or not) when the logical assumption would be Mihawk's and the sihchibukai's notoriety in general before them joining hand with Marines..especially when notoriety is why most Shichibukai were even offered the title to begin with
- you don't seem to question the material Marines have or are just blindly following statements that have no solid premise to substantiate them, and given that the story never indicates that Shanks lost duels against Mihawk yet somehow Shanks is supoosed to be blatantly inferior by just a flipin CoO.. wtf is this dood
thats yor interpretation... i don't take what marines say seriously especially when there are outdated basis and assumptions involved in it..
you switch from marines knowing who Mihawk fought in the decade to them sensing ones ability and skill against another top tier with CoO magically.. which is unprecedented and never was used to determine an outcome if a fight
ig get agendas but not disingenuousness
its flagrant how desperate yall are ofc thats your prerogative to bet on unlikely scenarios to suit agendas..
this whole statement is completely and utterly vague... why aren power levels a thing if thats how its supposed to be
there has never been a case where this CoO is used practically in a 1v1 fight to measure skill +strength on top of that
thats absolutely baseless.. and even in Rayleigh's case he was alluding to the haki of other monsters on the island and compared luffy's flagrant inferiority of it to them...
its an assumption that cannot be substantiated to increase its likelihood coz never in OnePiece has CoO been used to determine superiority in skill and physical strength in a specific art style
- its based on the assumption that marines know everything even skills and outcomes of matches based off of CoO which is a rough estimate and vague (when its mostly used to just indicate if opponents are strong or not) when the logical assumption would be Mihawk's and the sihchibukai's notoriety in general before them joining hand with Marines..especially when notoriety is why most Shichibukai were even offered the title to begin with
- you don't seem to question the material Marines have or are just blindly following statements that have no solid premise to substantiate them, and given that the story never indicates that Shanks lost duels against Mihawk yet somehow Shanks is supoosed to be blatantly inferior by just a flipin CoO.. wtf is this dood
thats yor interpretation... i don't take what marines say seriously especially when there are outdated basis and assumptions involved in it..
you switch from marines knowing who Mihawk fought in the decade to them sensing ones ability and skill against another top tier with CoO magically.. which is unprecedented and never was used to determine an outcome if a fight
ig get agendas but not disingenuousness
its flagrant how desperate yall are ofc thats your prerogative to bet on unlikely scenarios to suit agendas..
Where were you when similar information was displayed during the bounties of WB, Roger, Kaido and Big Mom? You think those are false too?