Is Mihawk more powerful than Shanks?


  • Total voters
    423
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
you're insinuating that they used Observation haki to gauge Shanks and Mihawk and deduced that Mihawk is more superior in swordsmanship?
:kaidowhat:
this whole statement is completely and utterly vague... why aren power levels a thing if thats how its supposed to be
there has never been a case where this CoO is used practically in a 1v1 fight to measure skill +strength on top of that

thats absolutely baseless.. and even in Rayleigh's case he was alluding to the haki of other monsters on the island and compared luffy's flagrant inferiority of it to them...

its an assumption that cannot be substantiated to increase its likelihood coz never in OnePiece has CoO been used to determine superiority in skill and physical strength in a specific art style


- its based on the assumption that marines know everything even skills and outcomes of matches based off of CoO which is a rough estimate and vague (when its mostly used to just indicate if opponents are strong or not) when the logical assumption would be Mihawk's and the sihchibukai's notoriety in general before them joining hand with Marines..especially when notoriety is why most Shichibukai were even offered the title to begin with

- you don't seem to question the material Marines have or are just blindly following statements that have no solid premise to substantiate them, and given that the story never indicates that Shanks lost duels against Mihawk yet somehow Shanks is supoosed to be blatantly inferior by just a flipin CoO.. wtf is this dood



thats yor interpretation... i don't take what marines say seriously especially when there are outdated basis and assumptions involved in it..

you switch from marines knowing who Mihawk fought in the decade to them sensing ones ability and skill against another top tier with CoO magically.. which is unprecedented and never was used to determine an outcome if a fight


ig get agendas but not disingenuousness


its flagrant how desperate yall are ofc thats your prerogative to bet on unlikely scenarios to suit agendas..
He's insinuating that Oda talks through these characters when it comes to such info dumps....hence they are factual. It is irrelevant how you think they got the information.

Where were you when similar information was displayed during the bounties of WB, Roger, Kaido and Big Mom? You think those are false too?
 
It applies to everyone called SWORDSMAN. There is literally no other definition than the real world one. Don't act like One Piece laid out a special new definition.
if you apply the real world definition THEN GUESS WHAT? NOBODY IS A SWORDSMAN
Haki : "the ability to cut what you want to cut and to not cut what you don't want to cut"
is this REAL Kendo? NO , if you slash something you cut it period
Growing 3 heads with Ashura is Kendo? NO
Using FLYING SLASHES is Kendo? NO
are you brain dead?
 
you're insinuating that they used Observation haki to gauge Shanks and Mihawk and deduced that Mihawk is more superior in swordsmanship?
:kaidowhat:
this whole statement is completely and utterly vague... why aren power levels a thing if thats how its supposed to be
there has never been a case where this CoO is used practically in a 1v1 fight to measure skill +strength on top of that

thats absolutely baseless.. and even in Rayleigh's case he was alluding to the haki of other monsters on the island and compared luffy's flagrant inferiority of it to them...

its an assumption that cannot be substantiated to increase its likelihood coz never in OnePiece has CoO been used to determine superiority in skill and physical strength in a specific art style


- its based on the assumption that marines know everything even skills and outcomes of matches based off of CoO which is a rough estimate and vague (when its mostly used to just indicate if opponents are strong or not) when the logical assumption would be Mihawk's and the sihchibukai's notoriety in general before them joining hand with Marines..especially when notoriety is why most Shichibukai were even offered the title to begin with

- you don't seem to question the material Marines have or are just blindly following statements that have no solid premise to substantiate them, and given that the story never indicates that Shanks lost duels against Mihawk yet somehow Shanks is supoosed to be blatantly inferior by just a flipin CoO.. wtf is this dood



thats yor interpretation... i don't take what marines say seriously especially when there are outdated basis and assumptions involved in it..

you switch from marines knowing who Mihawk fought in the decade to them sensing ones ability and skill against another top tier with CoO magically.. which is unprecedented and never was used to determine an outcome if a fight


ig get agendas but not disingenuousness


its flagrant how desperate yall are ofc thats your prerogative to bet on unlikely scenarios to suit agendas..
If you don't take Marines seriously what are you even doing here in this chapter?
All OP story had Marines dictating bounties and status of pirates and such will not change.
Accepting some but getting frisky about other just shows agenda tbh.


Revealing you are kinda of a masochist or something?
 
if you apply the real world definition THEN GUESS WHAT? NOBODY IS A SWORDSMAN
Haki : "the ability to cut what you want to cut and to not cut what you don't want to cut"
is this REAL Kendo? NO , if you slash something you cut it period
Growing 3 heads with Ashura is Kendo? NO
Using FLYING SLASHES is Kendo? NO
are you brain dead?
Who said any of that? The braindead one is clearly you. You deny official sources for fiction and constantly twist what I said by putting words in my mouth just to elevate a cartoon character in your rankings. It can't get any more braindead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top