I
Thats bs. You are missing the word 'context' everytime and are babbling and editing what I have said to make it look like you know shit. You are so over yourself that you cannot come to a simple understanding and you say I am nuts? I have already given you examples on how the majority decides things is right but still you bring another fallacy and when I explain what I meant about the context of comparison, you can't understand it and bring the same fallacy again?
Don't think you are right at everything. Have the courtesy to understand what the other is trying to say and then discussion is going to be good or else its like a deluded man yapping.
Don't think you are right at everything. Have the courtesy to understand what the other is trying to say and then discussion is going to be good or else its like a deluded man yapping.
Majority decides if something is right or wrong right? you said so
in a popularity contest, you vote for the character you like most, if you like something more, you think it's better than something else right?
if Zoro and Nami are voted more in a worldwide contest, and the Majority chooses both of them above Sanji, doesn't that make Zoro and Nami better characters than Sanji?
by your own argument?
Post automatically merged:
Objectively yes. Most people decided that Zoro and Nami are more likeable than Sanji