Do you feel that I am ? I'm simply posting random post to have fun lol. I don't care what you guyz are saying, I've seen that stuff hundreds times already, it's not new.
I'm simply throwing a stone in the pond.
That's because you confuse theorizing with analyzing. A theorizer is not an analyst.
I'm Both.
So while I might be wrong when I theorize, I'm not when I analyze, or very rarely and never here.
You would be surprised.
This shows that you don't understand what I'm talking about.
If you are able to understand a story, is because an author is creating their story under ceratin rules.
Those rules are objectives and can be analyzed objectively.
What I'm saying is that Oda is using a set of rule that you guyz do not seem to have the tool to understand plainly. This creates a situation where most people here, when I analyse those rules and narrations, are sayin to me "it's not that deep bro".
THis is what a lack of media literacy is. A lack of tools to really understand deeply a story.
Gladly, it's not incurable. You can learn to get those tools.