- Status
😂 do not twist my words…
One person or multiple ones have to suggest it, yes. Peer pressure is a thing, which is why a closed “tribunal” of users is not a good idea.
If yall were fair enough to include other hosts in decision making and make it a public thing like right now, that would be a totally different dimension.
One person or multiple ones have to suggest it, yes. Peer pressure is a thing, which is why a closed “tribunal” of users is not a good idea.
If yall were fair enough to include other hosts in decision making and make it a public thing like right now, that would be a totally different dimension.
This is what I mean when I say hosts should have final say whether a player should be allowed to play or not. During my fma game on FV lurker completely broke the game by ratting out his team mates, I had mods ready to ban the dude from playing and yet I chose not to ban him from my games. Why? Because sometimes shit happens, sometimes people get emotional, they get angry, they lash out or say or do things in the heat of the moment. We need to be more compassionate, if Joygirl was having meltdowns every game then yeah I'll understand why the decision was made but from what I see she's only played like 2 games and neither really warranted how she was dealt with.
Joygirls punishment is the equivalent of sending her to jail for 2 weeks because she kept crossing the street when the lights had turned red. What Joygirl needed was someone to explain to her why her actions were uncalled for and disrespectful to the host. Give her a warning or two and if she keeps behaving that way then yeah that's where mods should step in.
Joygirls punishment is the equivalent of sending her to jail for 2 weeks because she kept crossing the street when the lights had turned red. What Joygirl needed was someone to explain to her why her actions were uncalled for and disrespectful to the host. Give her a warning or two and if she keeps behaving that way then yeah that's where mods should step in.
- Status