And I said it's not a big deal. Nearly all top tiers has ridiculous Childhood.
Look at Bigmom , Oden. Both were considered physical monsters.
Imo BB and Shanks type don't exist on the same scale as Kaidou , Bigmom and Oden.
It's the same source. If you knew the sources you were using to claim " 15 yo shanks "

Atleast knows your sources. Nowhere it says 15 yo.
Look at Bigmom , Oden. Both were considered physical monsters.
Imo BB and Shanks type don't exist on the same scale as Kaidou , Bigmom and Oden.
It's the same source. If you knew the sources you were using to claim " 15 yo shanks "

Atleast knows your sources. Nowhere it says 15 yo.
15 year old Shanks is based on assumption that Roger Pirates disbanded around that time and hence Shanks being able to show his talent would not be possible, it might even be earlier. Again the point is you dont mention something like that if it is not impressive. Its somewhat similar to Ray being included in the CoC blast at FMI comparison or Kaido being included in answer about strength or Akainu being mentioned as finishing OP in one year. Those are legit hype statements from the author.
Why should I discredit SBS as a source when Zoros family tree is revealed in it. Or how GB and Fuji backstories or Fuji having a SG sword are mentioned there too?