Look, the thing is don't you guys see that Bogard is not trying to defend himself. He is just trolling:
And he also voted for TAC out of nowhere like if he is trying to provoke TAC:
And this is his explanation for the night kill:
Who else slept with Peter? A certain hoe named Sydney. And who was Sydney? A jester.
What I'm saying is these "attempts" of defending himself is weak and obviously a trap.
Think about Bogard's posting style in other games if we are going to use meta. He. Doesn't. Play. Like. This.
Where are the essays defending himself or pushing for someone else's lynch? He is clearly happy with the current situation but putting on a bad attempt to defend himself.
You guys, Bogard is a jester. I'm calling it.
Obligatory saltiness; Sydney better fucking hope I never run into her at the mall, or I'm gonna totally slam a piece of cinnamon bun into her big lying face for what she did to me and Peter's relationship.
Yeah. Bogard isn't acting himself. He's distanced from the game. But this mostly happened around when Beta first started putting blame on him, and intensified once I started to accuse him. It's suspicious and jester-y....
....And that's Bogard's strategy here Kiwi. The fact remains, a Night Kill failed on Bogard. The only people who have that type of protection are Godfather esque roles to my understanding, and maybe Independent Killers. We have no proof of independent killers, likely the Jester(s) took their spot. The fact Bogard can not be killed at night gives us one method of removal for him. Lynching. That automatically rules out the idea he is Jester. Jesters win by being lynched, this would effectively screw us over and leave us with a hostile player who we couldn't get rid of. I don't see that in the game design or balanced.
I think Bogard's trying to distance himself and is purposefully trying to leave his actions up to interpretation because he can't explain away why he wasn't killed, not without revealing his real role.