Well, it's been more quiet now. Like I said, I will look through Cinera's posts as @Rej
asked. I don't find him to be suspicious since his logic has been consistent the entire game. Very consistent.
Lynching for information, like here:
Then he made an analysis of it afterwards, and said that he regrets lynching Celestia over Don.
sifting through his posts, I don't see any inconsistence in his logic. Maybe my only criticism is he seems to go a bit too much with the flow. Like he said earlier he believes it's better to lynch Don but doesn't push for it. But it fits with his voting for information attitude.
Moving on, I also said last phase I want to look over Seraphoenix again.
Seraphoenix looks suspicious to me, first, using a one game meta to target NW, a novice player with something that seems nitpicky.
NW's response was quite defensive, but I think it's not abnormal for newer players to get defensive early on, like Jew D. Boy earlier today. It depends on the type of response, to me, Neutralwatcher's response seems genuine. He understood Seraphoenix's question as if Seraphoenix is implying that he suspected Bogard.
But following Seraphoenix's posts, I think he started nitpicking NW's responses and starting a "NW is a liar" type of push
And not recognizing that the question could be interpreted differently:
Well, with Reborn taking a backseat this phase, there isn't much driving the town forward. @Seraphoenix
you said that you were going to give your reads, lemme hear them.
For now, I'm placing the vote in since I might go to sleep soon.
Vote Lynch Seraphoenix