- Status
This is great. Let's Lynch TAC and see who among @Natalija and Flower is Scum. 
Both of them could be Scum, but it would be an extremely big brained move. At any rate, unless there's a role that can frame roles or there's a role that can redirect (without informing the redirected player that they were redirected) it is very unlikely that this is Town vs Town.
I would recommend Lynching TAC instead:
Whereas if we Lynch Flower:
Looking at the above:
Suspicions aside, I think a TAC Lynch is strictly better. However, looking at the earlier posts, I'm going to catch up to Day 1 and reevaluate.
Both of them could be Scum, but it would be an extremely big brained move. At any rate, unless there's a role that can frame roles or there's a role that can redirect (without informing the redirected player that they were redirected) it is very unlikely that this is Town vs Town.
I would recommend Lynching TAC instead:
- If TAC is Scum it strongly suggests Flower is Town and Natalija is Scum.
- If TAC is Town, it strongly suggests Flower is Scum and Natalija is Town.
Whereas if we Lynch Flower:
- If she's Town, it strongly suggests both TAC and Natalija are Scum.
- It gives the two Scum and extra night to act.
- If she's Scum, it strongly suggests Natalija is Town, but doesn't say much about TAC.
Looking at the above:
- A TAC Lynch would give us more information on two players.
- It prevents the scenario where we leave Two Scum free to act at Night.
- I prefer prioritising initial claims.
Suspicions aside, I think a TAC Lynch is strictly better. However, looking at the earlier posts, I'm going to catch up to Day 1 and reevaluate.
TAC flipping scum won’t prove to me that Flower is town in this situation. I know how stupid this sounds but if she were scum, what does she gain by accusing a townie?
So I think it could be bussing, like accusing scum teammate to clear one of them. This is similar to what she did in TOS where she claimed psychic early on but she didn’t go as far as busing her teammate.
Plus, Natalija is a newer player, I don’t see the benefit of her contesting Flower right now unless if she really does have info. But I do agree, this is very clearly a town vs scum
Vote Lynch Flower
Another lie. I know there is Unseen. NW could only be Paladin if that was a Cult Game, but then he would have clarified that DA couldn't have made a TMI slip last DP because due to no Unseen in the game DA couldn't have had too much information in the first place. But NW didn't do that and due to my role existing he is definitely lying. So there is that.
N
Why should I reveal my role early in the game? Claiming early has potential to be converted early in the game.
Dark made a slip that when Natalija asked how many kills, DA replied with just like in Unseen. I thought with lynching him and he was proved to be scum, we can know his role but he was knight instead.
Dark made a slip that when Natalija asked how many kills, DA replied with just like in Unseen. I thought with lynching him and he was proved to be scum, we can know his role but he was knight instead.
From previous games meta I recall Flower used a similar strategy when we played the ToS game.
She faked invest and had me lynched, so she is known for pulling off risky manouvers early game.
On the other hand I doubt a very inexperienced player like @Natalija would come out with this kind of fling honestly.
On top of it @NeutralWatcher is confirming that Flower is lying.
Now I really don't feel like not just Natalija, but even Neutral, would both lie.
Conclusively I think voting Flower holds the most sense here:
Vote Lynch Flower
She faked invest and had me lynched, so she is known for pulling off risky manouvers early game.
On the other hand I doubt a very inexperienced player like @Natalija would come out with this kind of fling honestly.
On top of it @NeutralWatcher is confirming that Flower is lying.
Now I really don't feel like not just Natalija, but even Neutral, would both lie.
Conclusively I think voting Flower holds the most sense here:
Vote Lynch Flower
On another note, @Natalija how do you know we have Cult in this game? 
Given that two players are staking claims that directly challenge her narrative, I find her more suspicious than TAC. I was willing to Lynch TAC when neither appeared particularly more suspicious but his Lynch appeared informative, but that isn't the case anymore.
Given that two players are staking claims that directly challenge her narrative, I find her more suspicious than TAC. I was willing to Lynch TAC when neither appeared particularly more suspicious but his Lynch appeared informative, but that isn't the case anymore.
"The Cult leader can use Eradicate at night to kill off players, but it is common practice in the first nights to try to convert Blue Dragon classes first instead of killing them. This is due to several reasons:
- The Cult can have up to four members and it quite needs those numbers.
- The Cult Leader does not have night or occupy immunity, and can be immediately detected by investigative classes (unlike the Unseen Mastermind). This means he is at much greater risk of dying.
- The Cult Leader's Eradicate ability only has three uses, and is only rechargeable by sacrificing a fellow Cult member. This means that you should choose your targets carefully.
But I am almost sure because she lied she investigated @TheAncientCenturion and branded him as Unseen.
I know she can't investigate -> her Unseen claim is to throw us off track. It is Cult.
- Status