rej was obscuring reads but he also drew so much attention to himself
it didnt look scummy at all. it generated a lot of the activity day one
a lot of votes towards the end cause a number of people would rather not have to deal with not knowing what the fuck rej was saying . rej gameplay was just not how experienced scums play period from my limited knowledge in the game.
Rej's gameplay was not how a townie should be playing either. You keep saying he generated activity but that's not a point in his favor. Scum generate activity. That shit ain't AI.
It is kinda scary how much votes Rej had on him, of course it was needed still kinda suspect that many user vote against him without thinking twice, I would assume that at least one mafia beeing one who vote against Rej. In that case we should see the first votes against him, who start it and which one go with him? I think in that case we could get answers.
Rej's gameplay was not how a townie should be playing either. You keep saying he generated activity but that's not a point in his favor. Scum generate activity. That shit ain't AI.
generating activity is how we develop reads drago
and each argument we had
is how we came across other suspects
that was the basis of your finalbeta, kiwi, tac read early on.
Really? That's why 10 ppl voted for him then right? I've never seen an obvious townie ever have such a large wagon on his ass and get lynched D1 before...sounds like the complete opposite of an obvious townie.
generating activity is how we develop reads drago
and each argument we had
is how we came across other suspects
that was the basis of your finalbeta, kiwi, tac read early on.
Post automatically merged:
defending how ?
defend someone who's gone
or saying his gameplay isnt how scum play
quote where I defend him.
Generating activity is not alignment indicative. Why are you not town reading Noctis and I? We generated activity did we not?
Generating activity is the weakest reason you can ever give for town reading someone and its not Rej was intentionally doing that. A player can generate activity, passively or actively and be scum. It by no means makes them town.
Also no, my reads on Kiwi, TAC, and Beta were not based on activity. It was based on game solving. Kiwi's particularly being based on an inconsistency within her reads.
Really? That's why 10 ppl voted for him then right? I've never seen an obvious townie ever have such a large wagon on his ass and get lynched D1 before...sounds like the complete opposite of an obvious townie.
Yes, really. Have you ever seen mafia scum, and an experienced one play like that D1? You probably didn’t. That’s the right read. He only puzzled town, so he was lynched.
But we digress. What do you think of this no kill situation?
Generating activity is not alignment indicative. Why are you not town reading Noctis and I? We generated activity did we not?
Generating activity is the weakest reason you can ever give for town reading someone and its not Rej was intentionally doing that. A player can generate activity, passively or actively and be scum. It by no means makes them town.
Also no, my reads on Kiwi, TAC, and Beta were not based on activity. It was based on game solving. Kiwi's particularly being based on an inconsistency within her reads.
perhaps I did
till you were willing to back out of your strongest scum read because. we werent town reading you
then turned around to say it was for fun.
noctis I have cited his inconsistency
i can go through the screenshots again
if you want.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.